• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Rocker arm Question

  • Thread starter Thread starter cheese_05_70
  • Start date Start date Apr 8, 2009
C

cheese_05_70

New Member
Aug 29, 2005
58
0
0
IL
Apr 8, 2009
#1
  • Apr 8, 2009
  • #1
I was brain storming and I thought about how most cams have a split intake and exhaust lift value.

So is it ok to put 1.6 rockers on the inake and 1.7 on the exhaust?

If this is a stupid idea please let me know.

I have a:
306 motor
vic sr. heads 2.02/1.60
1.6 rockers
E-303 cam
Typhoon intake
 
C

cheese_05_70

New Member
Aug 29, 2005
58
0
0
IL
Apr 8, 2009
#2
  • Apr 8, 2009
  • #2
Anybody?

or would it just be better to use all 1.7 or 1.6 rockers?
 
C

cheese_05_70

New Member
Aug 29, 2005
58
0
0
IL
Apr 9, 2009
#3
  • Apr 9, 2009
  • #3
bump
 

joel5.0

Member
Jun 15, 2004
429
2
18
Puerto Rico
Apr 9, 2009
#4
  • Apr 9, 2009
  • #4
That's an old school tinkering practice to increase the performance in a setup where a single pattern cam is used. In terms of what would be better for your setup, only testing will provide you with the data... some work better with 1.6/1.7 others with a 1.7/1.6 split setup. Is it better and more cost effective to go with the correct camshaft events nowadays?.... obviously.
 
C

cheese_05_70

New Member
Aug 29, 2005
58
0
0
IL
Apr 9, 2009
#5
  • Apr 9, 2009
  • #5
Thanks for the reply.

Well I have seen flow numbers on heads similar and it seems like they are weak on the exhaust side. They are already port and polished and I got it tuned and my numbers were low I thought. 256hp and 285tq but I also need a catback exhaust.
 
C

cheese_05_70

New Member
Aug 29, 2005
58
0
0
IL
Apr 10, 2009
#6
  • Apr 10, 2009
  • #6
Anybody have any other thoughts on this?
 
C

cheese_05_70

New Member
Aug 29, 2005
58
0
0
IL
Apr 11, 2009
#7
  • Apr 11, 2009
  • #7
bump
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
668
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 28, 2026
Noobz347
A
Discussion on mild budget build/ top end
  • Acesario
  • Feb 21, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
644
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 23, 2026
General karthief
SBF Head Flow Table - Work in Progress
  • Noobz347
  • Sep 29, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
17
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 30, 2025
Noobz347
Engine Valve and or rocker noise .....new to this but dont mind getting my hands dirty.
  • mustang matt 1993
  • Jun 29, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
16
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 1, 2024
rednotch
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?