• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Rocker arm slipped off, GT40 heads

  • Thread starter Thread starter DJCarbine
  • Start date Start date Sep 12, 2009
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

cobra1540

New Member
Sep 9, 2009
37
0
0
Sep 13, 2009
#21
  • Sep 13, 2009
  • #21
I have to go, I'll check back later.
 
2

2+2GT

10 Year Member
Apr 25, 2009
3,333
10
79
Southeastern Pennsylvania
Sep 13, 2009
#22
  • Sep 13, 2009
  • #22
The channel kit would be perfect, it has the advantage of not requiring pushrod replacement.
 
D

DJCarbine

New Member
May 4, 2005
392
0
0
Sep 13, 2009
#23
  • Sep 13, 2009
  • #23
cobra1540 said:
I don't know how thick they are, but you can buy shim kits also. I would check your lifter preload at the plunger, because the 3/4 - 1 1/4 turn after zero lash wasn't correct on my adj. rockers. but that would require removing your intake as well ( I assume you're running a carb ).
Click to expand...

Yeah the pedestal are non-adjustable, and all the resources I have gathered say that 1/4-3/4 turn after zero lash to fully seated on the pedestal mount is the correct preload

I have this preload achevied with .030-.060 thick shims, and if the channel guides are .030 inches thick then it would be perfect for my setup, otherwise the pushrods may come out to be too short or the preload would be way too light.

It should work out though, I am ordering the kit online and will see how they work as far as thickness
 

65ShelbyClone

Founding Member
Sep 9, 2000
4,675
38
119
Antelope Valley, SoCal
Sep 13, 2009
#24
  • Sep 13, 2009
  • #24
You probably figured this out already, but here is what they look like:

 
D

DJCarbine

New Member
May 4, 2005
392
0
0
Sep 13, 2009
#25
  • Sep 13, 2009
  • #25
65ShelbyClone said:
You probably figured this out already, but here is what they look like:

Click to expand...

They look to be thin enough, hopefully .030 or so

Thanks for mentioning those things, I'd hate to be running without them. Are they pretty much required for running pedestal type rockers on my particular head?
 

cobra1540

New Member
Sep 9, 2009
37
0
0
Sep 13, 2009
#26
  • Sep 13, 2009
  • #26
Yes, they are required.
 
D

DJCarbine

New Member
May 4, 2005
392
0
0
Sep 16, 2009
#27
  • Sep 16, 2009
  • #27
Just updating

The guides are .060" thick, and several of my rockers were shimmed to .060, which was perfect.

However, several of my rockers were also not shimmed or shimmed .030, causing a bit of a problem with lash. My valve geometry was correct before the installation of the guides, so to keep it simple I didn't want to order longer pushrods or anything (using 6.875, need 6.9-6.91 for some of the rockers), I decided to simply mill the required amount of material off the rocker pedestals. This keeps all the pushrods the same length, and while time consuming, a better way to go about it IMO.

Only did 4 cylinders so far, but it works great. When you mill the material off, you need to also do a *45 degree cut on the edges so that it will fit properly in the guides, sort of a bevel. The guides are stamped and bent steel, so the corners are not exactly 90 degree angles, more of a curve. The 45 degree bevel on the corner ensures that the pedestal will properly seat
 

cobra1540

New Member
Sep 9, 2009
37
0
0
Sep 16, 2009
#28
  • Sep 16, 2009
  • #28
It sucks you've got to machine the pedestals, but this should cure any future issues.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Engine 2008 stang gt lifter or rocker arm
  • Majestic_3v
  • Aug 17, 2025
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech
Replies
7
Views
321
2005 - 2009 Specific Tech Aug 20, 2025
Majestic_3v
Any 1 find any decent blackfriday sales for Foxbody or car stuff?
  • rednotch
  • Nov 29, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
18
Views
776
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 19, 2025
rednotch
A
Engine Genius installed oil filler above rocker arm…
  • afjLX
  • Mar 27, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
5
Views
527
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 29, 2025
nicholase
J
MEED HELP!! 86 mustang
  • Jacob0121
  • Jan 23, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
6
Views
351
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 25, 2026
CAMTWO1070
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
938
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?