• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Roller rockers fit under stock valve covers?

  • Thread starter Thread starter JCVERT
  • Start date Start date Jun 7, 2005

JCVERT

Member
Nov 18, 2004
43
0
6
Lynden
Jun 7, 2005
#1
  • Jun 7, 2005
  • #1
Ok so the bottom end of my engine is done now all I need is roller rockers and I'm getting the new BBK intake and I was wondering if you guyz know if say I get taller valve covers in case the roller rockers don't fit under stock valve covers, will the new bbk intake still clear b the throttle body? cuz they don't make a spacer for it yet. Sorry if this is a dumb question but I just want to be sure. by the way I need 1.6 rockers, and if you have a suggestion for what rockers to get, so post away thanks alot fellow stangers. (if you know of 1.6 rockers fitting under stock valve covers that would be great)
 

JCVERT

Member
Nov 18, 2004
43
0
6
Lynden
Jun 7, 2005
#2
  • Jun 7, 2005
  • #2
hmm....anyone? ....how about BBK's tech number
 

srothfuss

Last night I stabbed the same guy 7 times in a row
Oct 17, 2004
1,796
3
0
Woodward Ave.
Jun 7, 2005
#3
  • Jun 7, 2005
  • #3
I don't run them (yet) but I think that most people on here can get away with running a 1.6 RR under the stock valve covers. Sometimes they claim they need thicker gaskets or some require grinding of the oil baffle.

For a recomendation, I'd buy the FRPP ones but only because I like stock parts or parts from the OEM. Plus, the FRPP RR are manufactured or designed by Crane.
 

stang22

Active Member
Jan 29, 2003
1,318
7
38
Washington, D.C.
Jun 7, 2005
#4
  • Jun 7, 2005
  • #4
I run a TFS1 cam with 1.7's and don't have any problems.

Tim
 

dstanggt50

Founding Member
Sep 13, 2000
1,316
0
0
Woodinville, WA
Jun 7, 2005
#5
  • Jun 7, 2005
  • #5
I had to grind down the oil baffle ( don't know if thats the correct naming) right under where you fill in the oil in the valve cover, a square shape is under there, grinded it down a little. The other valve cover is ok. I've heard of others that don't have to do this, I run 1.6 FMS RR's
 

NosPony

New Member
Apr 2, 2004
278
0
0
Canton, Il
Jun 7, 2005
#6
  • Jun 7, 2005
  • #6
I used the comp cam magnum roller rockers. Like 150 bucks through summit. I took off the metal baffle screen on my 87 and had no issues. Also, I was running a e303 cam with it.
 

RYC CUKR

Founding Member
May 19, 2002
1,437
1
38
Orlando
Jun 7, 2005
#7
  • Jun 7, 2005
  • #7
I am running Scorpion 1.6 pedestal mount roller rockers. I ground down the baffle on the pass. side and ground down some of the ribs inside the stock covers to make em clear. Not hard since it is just aluminum. Just got a carbide style bit and a little die grinder for my compressor and voila they fit like a champ.
 

maverick0716

Founding Member
Jan 12, 2002
3,924
0
56
Chilliwack, BC, Canada
Jun 7, 2005
#8
  • Jun 7, 2005
  • #8
I know my stud mount Comp Cam Pro Magnums (1.6) wouldn't have fit under mine.....but my 85 covers might be a little shorter than the EFI ones.
 

JCVERT

Member
Nov 18, 2004
43
0
6
Lynden
Jun 8, 2005
#9
  • Jun 8, 2005
  • #9
Awesome thanks alot guyz!
 
8

88 5.0 hi perf

New Member
Mar 30, 2005
34
0
0
Jun 8, 2005
#10
  • Jun 8, 2005
  • #10
yeah i even had 1.7 comp cam rrs on my 88 with a bigger cam, and took out the baffle and had no clearance problems.
 

tmoss

Gettin Wired
Founding Member
Jun 28, 2001
7,153
32
128
Saint Louis, MO
Jun 8, 2005
#11
  • Jun 8, 2005
  • #11
Ford changed the valve cover casting - the early covers probably need the oil baffle removed and the corner gussets ground down to clear - I had to do that for my Scorpion 1.6 rockers in my 88.
 
5

50 Proof

Member
Jul 14, 2003
43
1
9
Orange County
Jun 8, 2005
#12
  • Jun 8, 2005
  • #12
you should be able to remove the baffle on the inside of the valve cover and avoid any clearance issues. You can run 1.7's under stock valve covers if you remove the baffle.

If you want to double check and be absolutely sure, clay the inside of your valve cover, turn the engine, and see if there is any indentations.
 

JCVERT

Member
Nov 18, 2004
43
0
6
Lynden
Jun 8, 2005
#13
  • Jun 8, 2005
  • #13
awesome, thanks again I appreciate it
 

jb89coupe

New Member
Sep 3, 2004
416
0
0
CT
Jun 9, 2005
#14
  • Jun 9, 2005
  • #14
I run stock 89 valve covers, fms 1.72 rockers, and stock cam with no clearance issues. I did NOT remove or modify the oil baffle but I doubled up on the valve cover gaskets.
 

JCVERT

Member
Nov 18, 2004
43
0
6
Lynden
Jun 13, 2005
#15
  • Jun 13, 2005
  • #15
OK so one more question guyz, I need 1.6 rockers and I have aluminum gt-40 heads (turbo swirl) and which rockers are a good bang for the buck, this guy was telling me I gotta get these crane gold race roller rockers or something and there like 350$ so I don't want to spend that much unless I have to so whats good average brand name that'll work? thanks
 

DW5.0L

Member
May 28, 2005
172
0
16
Florida
Jun 30, 2005
#16
  • Jun 30, 2005
  • #16
The FRPP 1.6 RR's can be had for less than $260. Shop around.
 

crazypete

All my crevices are greased.
Oct 22, 2004
930
4
18
Arlington, MA
Jun 30, 2005
#17
  • Jun 30, 2005
  • #17
Crane 1.7 pedestal mount roller rockers. Absolutely no chance of fitting under stock covers. None. All the grinding in the world and double gaskets still left me with multiple contact points.

Just have tall covers in mind when you do the swap.
 

Rick 91GT

Mustang Master
Nov 29, 1999
9,692
95
99
PA
Jun 30, 2005
#18
  • Jun 30, 2005
  • #18
RYC CUKR said:
I am running Scorpion 1.6 pedestal mount roller rockers. I ground down the baffle on the pass. side and ground down some of the ribs inside the stock covers to make em clear. Not hard since it is just aluminum. Just got a carbide style bit and a little die grinder for my compressor and voila they fit like a champ.
Click to expand...

same think I find with a inline head, getting them to clear on a TFS head is another story.

Just remember if you go with a tall cover you will need a spacer to get the intake to clear.

The COMP Polymers valve covers will clear a aftermarket rocker and still fit under near all the EFI manifolds with no issues.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

T
Oil burning on my recently buil 302
  • The blk67
  • May 15, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
159
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 15, 2026
Noobz347
SOLD Sold.
  • TTSaleen
  • Jul 1, 2026
  • Engine and Power Adder
Replies
6
Views
294
Engine and Power Adder Jul 2, 2026
Noobz347
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
903
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
A
Engine Genius installed oil filler above rocker arm…
  • afjLX
  • Mar 27, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
5
Views
523
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 29, 2025
nicholase
9
Forced Induction Prepping for supercharger on non-stock build
  • 91fox427
  • Nov 25, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
420
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 5, 2026
Qtrhrse23
Q
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?