• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

roller vs non-roller cam

  • Thread starter Thread starter jerry S
  • Start date Start date Jun 4, 2005

jerry S

New Member
Sep 3, 2003
1,365
1
0
52.22N 5.12E
Jun 4, 2005
#1
  • Jun 4, 2005
  • #1
How much better is the roller vs the non roller? I currently have a hydraulic flat tap cam. What kind of gain might see by converting over to a hydraulic roller cam? I know I would have to change the valve springs. I have screw in roller rockers so I am ok there.
 

skywalker

Member
Dec 22, 2003
733
0
16
Pensacola, FL
Jun 4, 2005
#2
  • Jun 4, 2005
  • #2
The biggest 2 differences:
less friction which translates into faster/smoother revs.
Higher ramp times and more radical profiles without ruining streetability. This means you can pull more power and still seem like a street car.

If you put a roller cam on that has the same basic profile as your flat tappet cam, then you probably won't notice any gains (though some slight ones would probably show up on a dyno.) But you can get more radical with your cams and still maintain streetability (if that is your goal.)
 

65ShelbyClone

Founding Member
Sep 9, 2000
4,675
38
119
Antelope Valley, SoCal
Jun 4, 2005
#3
  • Jun 4, 2005
  • #3
I agree with sky.

The roller cams' design allows faster ramp rates, meaning the valve opens faster and therefore can stay there longer. Rollers tend to have a broader torque spread in mild apps and can be more agressive before getting unstreetable. They also (usually) have a distinctive sound compared to flat cams.

What are the specs on your flat cam? Judging by your mods, its probably pretty lumpy.
 

jerry S

New Member
Sep 3, 2003
1,365
1
0
52.22N 5.12E
Jun 4, 2005
#4
  • Jun 4, 2005
  • #4
65ShelbyClone said:
What are the specs on your flat cam? Judging by your mods, its probably pretty lumpy.
Click to expand...

Here is my grind:

ADV DUR: INT 297, EXH 308
LIFT: INT 538, EXH 534
DURATION AT .50 DEGREES: INT 236, EXH 242 @ 108 centerline

If I convert to a roller and get better valve springs, how much "more" cam could I turn and what kind of gains might I see?

My objectives are to realize more HP and more torque than now. I am stuck with my current heads and pistons but I will upgrade to a 700 cfm double pumper and an RPM Air Gap.
 

Attachments

  • dyno.3aa.webp
    32.5 KB · Views: 214

65ShelbyClone

Founding Member
Sep 9, 2000
4,675
38
119
Antelope Valley, SoCal
Jun 4, 2005
#5
  • Jun 4, 2005
  • #5
I was right, that is pretty lumpy .

If you dont have any more space between your valves and pistons with the current cam, then you wont be able to run "more" cam per se. If you get a roller with the same specs, I would guess a 10-15fwhp gain just by design. A custom cam might net you even more. This is the point where I put the disclaimer saying I'm not a cam expert, but I do know how they work.

Thats a nice dyno chart too.
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Jun 4, 2005
#6
  • Jun 4, 2005
  • #6
If you don't already have a roller cam block, the gains you'll get from a roller will not be cost effective. Cost to convert a non roller block to a roller cam, is going to run you at least $600, maybe more.
 

skywalker

Member
Dec 22, 2003
733
0
16
Pensacola, FL
Jun 4, 2005
#7
  • Jun 4, 2005
  • #7
D.Hearne said:
If you don't already have a roller cam block, the gains you'll get from a roller will not be cost effective. Cost to convert a non roller block to a roller cam, is going to run you at least $600, maybe more.
Click to expand...

More like $400 if you get the link bar lifters from crane cams. And you can use a standard base circle cam.
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Jun 5, 2005
#8
  • Jun 5, 2005
  • #8
skywalker said:
More like $400 if you get the link bar lifters from crane cams. And you can use a standard base circle cam.
Click to expand...
You've forgoten to add in the cost of pushrods, valve springs, and the cam, and a steel cam gear, and if going the other route, (reduced base circle cam) the tie down hardware
 

jerry S

New Member
Sep 3, 2003
1,365
1
0
52.22N 5.12E
Jun 5, 2005
#9
  • Jun 5, 2005
  • #9
D.Hearne said:
If you don't already have a roller cam block, the gains you'll get from a roller will not be cost effective. Cost to convert a non roller block to a roller cam, is going to run you at least $600, maybe more.
Click to expand...

Let's see: $300 for the cam, $150 for the springs, and then maybe $250 in labor. I have a new steel cam gear that came with my MSD distrib but after re-evaluating it, I do not consider this a cost effective way to gain 15 hp.
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Jun 5, 2005
#10
  • Jun 5, 2005
  • #10
Using Crane's lifters: $150 for the cam, $120 for springs & retainers, $30 for pushrods, $420 for the lifters, $45 for the cam gear, thats $735. Using a reduced base cam, $300 ( guessing here) for the cam, $30 for pushrods, $180 ( for a better set of Crane stock type replacement lifters) the tie down hardware?, $30 at most. $45 for the dist. gear. That's $585, almost $600. Not really worth it in my opinion. If you're starting with a roller block, the costs come way down and well worth it then.
 
1

10secgoal

Active Member
Dec 1, 2003
2,801
3
49
San Diego
Jun 6, 2005
#11
  • Jun 6, 2005
  • #11
Pish posh. What about spider plate, dog bones, and push rods from junk yard..30 bucks Cam, steel gear, and springs...dirt cheap, you'd have to weld in the spider plate, but we'll worry about the removal later. Anyone ?
 

65ShelbyClone

Founding Member
Sep 9, 2000
4,675
38
119
Antelope Valley, SoCal
Jun 6, 2005
#12
  • Jun 6, 2005
  • #12
10secgoal said:
you'd have to weld in the spider plate, but we'll worry about the removal later.
Click to expand...

You're kidding, right?
 

65fastback2+2

New Member
Aug 4, 2003
1,229
0
0
Louisville, KY
Jun 6, 2005
#13
  • Jun 6, 2005
  • #13
10secgoal said:
Pish posh. What about spider plate, dog bones, and push rods from junk yard..30 bucks Cam, steel gear, and springs...dirt cheap, you'd have to weld in the spider plate, but we'll worry about the removal later. Anyone ?
Click to expand...

you can drill the two screw holes in the block yourself. cheap, easy.
 
1

10secgoal

Active Member
Dec 1, 2003
2,801
3
49
San Diego
Jun 6, 2005
#14
  • Jun 6, 2005
  • #14
65ShelbyClone said:
You're kidding, right?
Click to expand...
Hehe
, yeah of course, but fastback is right. Just had to be careful not to go too far and go into the cam bearings.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

D
First post 289 rebuild question!
  • Ddyer2868
  • Nov 24, 2025
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
3
Views
233
Classic Mustang Specific Tech Dec 5, 2025
rednotch
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
692
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 28, 2026
Noobz347
D
Engine HO cam in non HO roller block ‘93 f150
  • DanC1993f150
  • Mar 21, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
217
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 29, 2026
General karthief
C
Valve stem tip tap?
  • Coolen
  • Apr 6, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
828
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 14, 2025
Noobz347
G
Engine Pushrod Length Question
  • germain101
  • Sep 22, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
12
Views
507
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Sep 25, 2025
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?