• Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech

Roush blower price reduced

  • Thread starter Thread starter mustangdave
  • Start date Start date May 21, 2009
M

mustangdave

My rearend needs a stud and two nuts.
Founding Member
Feb 26, 2002
2,976
1
56
North Carolina
May 21, 2009
#1
  • May 21, 2009
  • #1
Roush just knocked off over $900 off their standard M90 blower; now only 4999! Anyone have this blower and opinions? I know there are more powerful units but it seems like a good deal to get to 435 h.p. safely with warranty intact. Any dyno graphs from those that have used them? Thx.
 

Five Oh Brian

Member
Jun 13, 2007
552
1
16
Pacific Northwest
May 21, 2009
#2
  • May 21, 2009
  • #2
Dyno graphs don't tell the whole story. Take a look at some timeslips, too.

I've seen a few S197 Mustang GT's with these blowers at our local dragstrips. They tend to run high 12.7's to 12.8's @ about 108-109 mph in the 1/4 mile with no other mods. The ones I've seen were with manual transmissions and had drag radials.

$4999 is not bad, but I only paid $3700 for my Vortech V2 (non-intercooled) last year and my heavy, automatic GT runs 12.30's @ 111+ mph in the 1/4 mile. My motor is 100% factory stock, as are the entire exhaust & suspension, but I do run drag radials. So, for $1300 less, I'm going nearly 1/2 second quicker than the Roushcharged cars at our local strip.

The Vortech V2 & V3 models are 50-state smog legal, 3/36 warranty compliant, and can be cranked up to much bigger power numbers if you dare. With the standard pulley, my GT is making about 450hp at the flywheel with a very safe, conservative, daily driver tune.
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
May 21, 2009
#3
  • May 21, 2009
  • #3
You can't compare cost between a Positive Displacement blower and a Centrifugal. The Positive Displacement kit is always going to be more expensive than the Centrifugal (especially non-intercooled) based simply on the manufacturing cost of the blower and the complexity of the system.

When you buy a positive displacement blower, you're paying for the advantage of off idle torque, superior drivability and throttle response…not to mention immense under hood space savings. Things that are unmatched when compared to a centrifugal or turbo. The trade off in this case, is horsepower capability because of the MP90's limited displacement. Some guys are alright with giving up (or not making) that extra amount of torque down low. I however, am not one of them.

...horsepower aside, I'll always choose a positive displacement blower over any other form of power adder for a daily driver that's going to see mainly street duty. What the MP90 lacks in top end potential, it makes up for in boost response and quick intake pressurization. Compare the dyno sheets and even the seat of the pants feel with that little MP90 to some of the other large displacement Twin Screw blowers on the market and you'll see the MP90 has a measurable advantage way down low in the power curve.

In short…yes, for $4,999, the MP90 based Roush kit is a great buy for the money.
 
M

mustangdave

My rearend needs a stud and two nuts.
Founding Member
Feb 26, 2002
2,976
1
56
North Carolina
May 22, 2009
#4
  • May 22, 2009
  • #4
Yes, nothing wrong with the centrifugals especially cost-wise, but I'm looking for low end grunt and street fun. Racing will be few and far between. I can't tell from their site but it appears to be non-intercooled and these engines already create alot of heat so that is a concern.
 
B

blbrchnk

New Member
Oct 16, 2006
268
0
0
Bridgeport, WV
May 22, 2009
#5
  • May 22, 2009
  • #5
Could always go for the centrifugal and the higher gears to get you into the meat of the powerband quicker....
 

RMB427R

New Member
Apr 15, 2009
6
0
1
Finleyville, PA
May 22, 2009
#6
  • May 22, 2009
  • #6
To answer your original question, I have the M90 blower in my Roush and love it!! It's power from the get go.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

C
89 strange no spark, tfi question?
  • chriscash96
  • Mar 14, 2022
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
13
Views
8K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 20, 2023
AeroCoupe
302 Engine build questions
  • Vulpes5.0
  • Apr 19, 2022
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
5K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 10, 2022
LEEDAY Boss
L
P0411/P0153 1996 Mustang Cobra
  • lokidawg
  • Jul 23, 2021
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
2K
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Jul 26, 2021
lokidawg
L
P
Info for 05-09 Mustang GT owners who have experienced total power loss (dead stalls) after 1-2 hours of hwy driving
  • purplegold90
  • Oct 31, 2019
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
3K
2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk- Nov 1, 2019
racerraj
R
B
Daily driver debate: 65-68 coupe or 62-63 Comet
  • BoulevardofRustedDreams
  • Oct 18, 2019
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
6
Views
2K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Nov 1, 2020
wicked93gs
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?