• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

safe to run VT stage 1 cams with stock springs?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mdvaldosta
  • Start date Start date Jun 22, 2004

mdvaldosta

New Member
Sep 11, 2003
72
0
0
Jun 22, 2004
#1
  • Jun 22, 2004
  • #1
Just wondering. I know they should be changed to be safe, but I don't wanna do it. I feel ok not changing them, just wanted some opinions.
 
0

007

Founding Member
Jan 29, 2002
3,287
24
69
Broke
Jun 22, 2004
#2
  • Jun 22, 2004
  • #2
They are fine with stock springs.
 
C

cltgt

Founding Member
Apr 15, 2001
931
0
0
Geneva, Fl.
Jun 22, 2004
#3
  • Jun 22, 2004
  • #3
I don't know what the lift is on those cams, but you would be better off changing them before something bad happens. Stock springs may eventually suffer from coil bind at high rpm's due to lift and added duration. JMHO, but call VT Engines and see what they say. Better safe than sorry.
 
C

cadde300

New Member
Oct 7, 2003
91
0
0
Jun 23, 2004
#4
  • Jun 23, 2004
  • #4
VT has answered this question many times, springs aren't needed for the stage one cams. But if it were me and I had a motor with a few miles on it i.e.- 50k+, then I would change my springs but other than that I wouldn't change them unless I went with the stage II's
 

pony_vert02

New Member
Mar 16, 2004
285
0
0
AUSTIN,TX
Jun 23, 2004
#5
  • Jun 23, 2004
  • #5
i remember reading an exhaustingly long thread on modulardepot about this issue..bottom line.. stage I cams will work fine with stock springs.. and in some cases, stage II's do too... some guys changed the springs after installing the stage II's and encountered problems with ticking, clearance etc.. they reinstalled the stock springs and it went away..they suggested that maybe the newer springs were too stiff and wasn't compressing enough or something like that.. don't take it as gospel, search modulardepot, you'll prolly find it as well..
 

Ryan02Stang

Active Member
Jun 17, 2003
1,181
0
36
Arlington Heights, Illinois
Jun 23, 2004
#6
  • Jun 23, 2004
  • #6
I personally would change them, they are only $180. But it is NOT needed!
 
C

cadde300

New Member
Oct 7, 2003
91
0
0
Jun 23, 2004
#7
  • Jun 23, 2004
  • #7
if you are doing it yourself the cams aren't that bad from what I hear, it is the springs that are the pita. Depends on what you are comfortable with....there is no benefit really to change the spring with stage I cams...just my .02
 

mdvaldosta

New Member
Sep 11, 2003
72
0
0
Jun 23, 2004
#8
  • Jun 23, 2004
  • #8
Thats my philosophy as well. Its not the cost of the springs, its the fact that its gonna take all friggen day to change the springs when its gonna take just a couple hours doing the cams.

Also, Bill Putnam was said to have gotten 22 rwhp from stage 1's and he changed the springs, and another guy showed 33 rwhp and he didn't change them. Now it could be alot of other factors like mileage on Bill's car etc., but I think that putting stiffer springs would rob some hp.

I KNOW I will be safe spinning to 6k, but looking at the powerband of the cams it appears it would be best to shift at between 6300 - 6500 rpm. Kinda scary on stock springs, thats my biggest concern.

I've looked on Modular Depot for a thread relating to this by the way, but to no avail.
 
R

Rocketman

New Member
Apr 20, 2004
730
0
0
SoCal
Jun 23, 2004
#9
  • Jun 23, 2004
  • #9
According to the SHM 4.6 book, you are safe with stock springs ( PI head ) up to .550 of gross lift. So, as long as your cam specs don't exceed that amount of lift, you will be OK.

 

Purebred

New Member
Aug 4, 2003
204
0
0
Maryland
Jun 23, 2004
#10
  • Jun 23, 2004
  • #10
Rocketman said:
According to the SHM 4.6 book, you are safe with stock springs ( PI head ) up to .550 of gross lift. So, as long as your cam specs don't exceed that amount of lift, you will be OK.

Click to expand...

Where can I get that book??
 
R

Rocketman

New Member
Apr 20, 2004
730
0
0
SoCal
Jun 23, 2004
#11
  • Jun 23, 2004
  • #11
Purebred said:
Where can I get that book??
Click to expand...

Got mine at Barnes and Noble. You can also order it from SHM

http://www.seanhylandmotorsport.com/
 
I

inferno9898

Member
May 17, 2003
249
1
18
Jun 23, 2004
#12
  • Jun 23, 2004
  • #12
i got mine from amazon.com. great read.
 

Purebred

New Member
Aug 4, 2003
204
0
0
Maryland
Jun 23, 2004
#13
  • Jun 23, 2004
  • #13
Thanks, guys
 

mpcv2000

Active Member
Jul 29, 2002
2,371
0
47
Montreal , Quebec !
Jun 23, 2004
#14
  • Jun 23, 2004
  • #14
Rocketman said:
Got mine at Barnes and Noble. You can also order it from SHM

http://www.seanhylandmotorsport.com/
Click to expand...

I have one too and it's very interesting reading !

I even asked Sean to sign it !

 

Mustang92

SN's #1 1%er
Jun 6, 2001
6,467
2
79
South Florida
Jun 24, 2004
#15
  • Jun 24, 2004
  • #15
mdvaldosta said:
Thats my philosophy as well. Its not the cost of the springs, its the fact that its gonna take all friggen day to change the springs when its gonna take just a couple hours doing the cams.

Also, Bill Putnam was said to have gotten 22 rwhp from stage 1's and he changed the springs, and another guy showed 33 rwhp and he didn't change them. Now it could be alot of other factors like mileage on Bill's car etc., but I think that putting stiffer springs would rob some hp.

I KNOW I will be safe spinning to 6k, but looking at the powerband of the cams it appears it would be best to shift at between 6300 - 6500 rpm. Kinda scary on stock springs, thats my biggest concern.

I've looked on Modular Depot for a thread relating to this by the way, but to no avail.
Click to expand...

There are plenty of factors that could lead to the reason why I didn't gain as much as someone else. You always have to keep in mind that mods work together and just because one person picks up X amount of power it doesn't mean that everyone will see the same gain. With no mods I might have seen 33RWHP and the guy that picked up 33RWHP might not have seen that much if he had more mods such as my car.

Also the springs although stronger are not stiff enough to actually cause any power losses. Certainly not 11RWHP. If you look at the springs they are basically identical to stock except are slightly longer...thus being able to handle slightly more lift. My main reasoning for going with new springs were due to high mileage 100+ at the time and the power band moving up higher due to more duration. I knew my shift points would be in the 6500 RPM range and I wanted to ensure no valve float or failure due to RPM on such a high mileage motor. So far at 111,900 mile motor and 6700 RPM shift points, 6600 RPM launch point no problems.

My suggestion is find someone local that can help you with the job and is familiar with installing springs then plan it over a weekend where you can work on it a few hours each day without wearing yourself completely out or getting overly frustrated with the job. With the right help the entire job can be knocked out in 7-10 hours.

Bill
 
V

VatStang

New Member
Apr 4, 2004
88
0
0
Santa Clarita, CA
Jun 24, 2004
#16
  • Jun 24, 2004
  • #16
Just to be safe, if you're over 50K, then get stock replacement springs. Yeah, don't tear into that $3500 engine unless you have a knowledgeable hand with you. Good luck though.
 

mdvaldosta

New Member
Sep 11, 2003
72
0
0
Jun 24, 2004
#17
  • Jun 24, 2004
  • #17
I am a knowledgable hand. I expected if Bill posted he would "recommend" a spring change. I really wanted to hear from people with experience running the stock springs - or knew people that did. In particular Im wondering about possible valve floating over 6k.

-----
Mustang Forums
 

Mustang92

SN's #1 1%er
Jun 6, 2001
6,467
2
79
South Florida
Jun 25, 2004
#18
  • Jun 25, 2004
  • #18
mdvaldosta said:
I am a knowledgable hand. I expected if Bill posted he would "recommend" a spring change. I really wanted to hear from people with experience running the stock springs - or knew people that did. In particular Im wondering about possible valve floating over 6k.
Click to expand...

I think it's a bit early in the game to see results from people with the stage 1s and stock springs. I don't know of many that have gone that route yet. If I had a lower mileage motor and a daily driver aside from the Mustang then I would have tried it on stock springs. However as it was at the time of the install I needed the car for going to work so I didn't take any chances.

By knowledgable hand I think VatStang is referring to someone that has done the cams/springs install already. I consider myself a knowledgeable hand in general but at the time I certainly wasn't knowledgeable about the cams and springs install. I was lucky enough to have some good friends that have gone through it many times to help me out with the tricky parts.

Bill
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Sloppy steering wheel
  • cnorman31
  • Nov 1, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
305
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Nov 2, 2025
Monkeybutt2000
M
Big Posi and Neg wire from Starter to Battery and Alt wires..........
  • from6to8
  • Feb 9, 2026
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
1
Views
229
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Feb 9, 2026
AeroCoupe
S
Engine 2003 Mach 1 Automatic Upgrades assistance
  • SJK1417M1AT
  • Sep 25, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
306
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Dec 21, 2025
01SVTvertt
0
Engine Suggestions on an engine rebuild. Stock cam/GT40Ps or aftermarket on both for a fun weekend driver?
  • MadSquirrelTech
  • Apr 28, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
879
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 7, 2026
MadSquirrelTech
A
Discussion on mild budget build/ top end
  • Acesario
  • Feb 21, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
780
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 23, 2026
General karthief
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?