As they settle on my car the rear looks a little saggy ill take some new pics soon... but anyone else with sn95's seeing this problem i know it happens often with the 99 up guys
Saggy sportlines...
- Thread starter Adam95GT
- Start date
no wait i might just be a dumb ass i have a trunk full of **** clutch kit ect.... have to have like 100lbs back there lol
LGSCHMIDTJR
New Member
adam and hissing
could this have anything to do with the verts being heavier, and the spring being coupe specific??
laurence
could this have anything to do with the verts being heavier, and the spring being coupe specific??
laurence
mustang6tee8
Member
HISSIN50 said:I sympathize. I just did used Mach 1's on the fox vert and the rear looks like crap. It needs more height back there (the rear is almost lower than the front.).
aww that's not good to hear.. what happened to them?
I dont know. Everything was great from you - the springs cleaned up real nice and looked good-to-go.mustang6tee8 said:
The OEM vert springs were night and day contrast however. A solid 2"+ taller (just like the fronts, in terms of height difference) but the stock rears are much thicker (I should mic the coils and take pics just for future reference for people). I've not come across many folks who have put Mach 1's in a fox vert; I thought a Mach 1 would probably weigh as much as a fox vert so it would work. I guess I was wrong.
I also noticed that the top OEM rear spring isolator was much thicker than the ES poly that I replaced it with. Seems like it's a totality of little things that make things look less good than I hoped. I like a little bit of rake (my rear sits 1/4" lower than the front - that's the wrong kind of rake.
Similar threads
