• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

SC v. Turbo

  • Thread starter Thread starter NIN
  • Start date Start date Oct 29, 2004
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

NIN

New Member
Dec 4, 2002
452
0
0
moorhead MN
Oct 29, 2004
#1
  • Oct 29, 2004
  • #1
I was looking at the hp turbo web site and they are charging 4500 for their base kit and a very good SC kit goes 3500-3700. Is it worth spending the extra money on a turbo for a daily driver. plus the extra time intalling new headers.

The reason I was looking into a turbo is because it ruduces the stress on my stock block. But 6psi out of intercooled procharger won't hurt. Would it?
 

millhouse

Founding Member
May 14, 2002
1,985
0
46
Simpsonville, SC
Oct 29, 2004
#2
  • Oct 29, 2004
  • #2
The HP base kit is more complete, plain and simple. Chances are with the hp kit, you get things such as intercooler, fuel injectors, fuel pump etc. that will ulitmatley enable you to get a safer tune, and more h/p to boot. Most supercharger kits I believe come with only a fmu for the extra fuel delivery, and most dont include an inter/after cooler.

Ultimatley it's up to you and your funds. You will probably be able to push more rwhp with the turbo on pump fuel.

If it were me, i'd just make your own turbo kit for less than $1500 and call it good
 
9

98V6

New Member
Oct 28, 2004
43
0
0
Baltimore, MD
Oct 29, 2004
#3
  • Oct 29, 2004
  • #3
millhouse said:
If it were me, i'd just make your own turbo kit for less than $1500 and call it good
Click to expand...

How would you go about doing that ?
 

95_cobra123

New Member
Jun 14, 2004
213
0
0
Lovington, IL
Oct 29, 2004
#4
  • Oct 29, 2004
  • #4
Turbo Turbo Turbo Turbo Turbo
 

millhouse

Founding Member
May 14, 2002
1,985
0
46
Simpsonville, SC
Oct 29, 2004
#5
  • Oct 29, 2004
  • #5
98V6 said:
How would you go about doing that ?
Click to expand...


Very cheaply

Really though, check out turbomustangs.com to learn about diy (do it yourself) junkyard turbo's. All the information you need to know is in there.

Also check out some of the featured cars and what they have run with jy setups. There are some very impressive numbers from which people have expended very little funds (relativley speaking).
 
H

highhorseb

Founding Member
Oct 26, 2001
226
0
16
Finksburg, Maryland
Oct 29, 2004
#6
  • Oct 29, 2004
  • #6
You can now get a Polished Vortech S-Trim kit (pt# 4FG218-028SQ) for under $2500 and Vortech is offering a $100 rebate. It will give you between 6-8PSI which will be no problem for your stock block and includes everything you will need to be operational(minus a tune). DIY turbo kits are cheap HP, but 90% of the ones I've seen look like hack jobs.
 

Rootus

Officially Addicted
Feb 8, 2003
6,659
1
0
Portland, Oregon
Oct 29, 2004
#7
  • Oct 29, 2004
  • #7
Kenne Bell
 

nmcgrawj

Advanced Member
Sep 28, 2003
3,651
4
68
Indianapolis, IN
Oct 29, 2004
#8
  • Oct 29, 2004
  • #8
Rootus said:
Kenne Bell
Click to expand...


Being around a couple 03 cobras that did the Kennebell swap, and even ones with just a smaller pulley....i LOVE that whine from the superchargers when they come screamin past....turbos might be able to do more rwhp in some applications, but i dont wanna spend that much money to drive around and it sound like my car is sneezing every time i shift

I want a kenne bell in the future....I WISH whipple would go back in time for a second and design a charger for our cars......
 

Scott_95GT

New Member
Oct 8, 2004
387
0
0
Sacramento
Oct 29, 2004
#9
  • Oct 29, 2004
  • #9
The vortech s-trim kit is the way I would go. Reliable, performs very well, and much cheaper than the turbo route. Turbos kick a*s without a doubt, but I would get the vortech, and put 2,000$$ in the bank. The vortech added to your setup will dominate nearly anything you could possible come in contact with.
 
P

ponypowa2

New Member
May 17, 2004
228
0
0
Destin, FL
Oct 29, 2004
#10
  • Oct 29, 2004
  • #10
eh

Im not the most knowledgeable person on the subject, but dont mustangs produce good low end torque, what would be the point of putting a turbo on a car that is not designed for higher rpms or even a top speed? Wouldn't the supercharger make more sense?
 
Y

yellow1995Cobra

New Member
Dec 23, 2002
2,959
2
0
Massachusetts
Oct 29, 2004
#11
  • Oct 29, 2004
  • #11
ponypowa2 said:
Im not the most knowledgeable person on the subject, but dont mustangs produce good low end torque, what would be the point of putting a turbo on a car that is not designed for higher rpms or even a top speed? Wouldn't the supercharger make more sense?
Click to expand...




Just do a search on the subject, its been gone over time and time again. Turbos are far superior in every regard except ease of install and price in some situations.
 

mystang94gt

New Member
Jun 14, 2004
951
0
0
Bay Area, CA
Oct 29, 2004
#12
  • Oct 29, 2004
  • #12
Rootus said:
Kenne Bell
Click to expand...


Full boost at 2000rpm's......
 

OinkAodeOink

Founding Member
Jun 5, 2002
3,026
1
0
Daytona bch, Florida
Oct 29, 2004
#13
  • Oct 29, 2004
  • #13
Speaking from experience..ive ran

-Vortech supercharger bone stock motor
-Vortech w/ heads, cam, intake
-Turbo w/ heads cam intake
-342ci turbo...


Blower was easy to install, looking back on it, made good power ( 320rwhp)
and cost me around $2100 all together
(fuel pump, injectors, maf, blower stuff was used)

Turbo setup was custom built by me
Cost for that was around $1100
(minus the injectors, maf ,& fuel pump i already had) Turbo setup was making around 475 horse before i built another motor.

Bottom line... Turbos make more all around power, are more complicated to install, but you get MUCH more value for your money IMO, and full exhuast!
Turbos feel like a hit of nitrous! scare the hell outa people, and if sized correctly will make full boost close to that of a kenny bell, without running out of steam in the upper rpm's
 

NIN

New Member
Dec 4, 2002
452
0
0
moorhead MN
Oct 29, 2004
#14
  • Oct 29, 2004
  • #14
I have a couple of issues.

1. The reason I wanted a turbo because it would put less stress at the same power level compared to a SC.

2. I already have a full exhaust and would change only if i have to.

3. I want to be able to apply more boost when my engine is built down the road.

4. cost, A diy turbo would fit the bill if I don't have to do any welding. Is this possible?

5. time, it installs in 12-14 hours compared to a 6 hour SC install.

It's hard to decide but I hope you guys can help me find the best solution to my power problems. LOL
 

Rootus

Officially Addicted
Feb 8, 2003
6,659
1
0
Portland, Oregon
Oct 29, 2004
#15
  • Oct 29, 2004
  • #15
mystang94gt said:
Full boost at 2000rpm's......
Click to expand...
Indeed . I don't have a KB, but I have an Eaton, which gives a similar effect. I quite like the instant power-on-demand of a positive displacement blower. It's a myth that they run out of steam on the top end, that's only if they're too small. The same would happen if you used to small of a turbo. KB makes a 2.2L blower for the 5.0L that won't run out of steam until after the motor blows up.

Dave
 

NIN

New Member
Dec 4, 2002
452
0
0
moorhead MN
Oct 29, 2004
#16
  • Oct 29, 2004
  • #16
I would also like a kenne bell but it doesn't work with my intake. I would have to go back to stock.
 

Rootus

Officially Addicted
Feb 8, 2003
6,659
1
0
Portland, Oregon
Oct 29, 2004
#17
  • Oct 29, 2004
  • #17
NIN said:
I would also like a kenne bell but it doesn't work with my intake. I would have to go back to stock.
Click to expand...
Nah, get a Cobra/Explorer lower and get the appropriate KB for that. You would be able to sell your TFS intake to more than cover the cost.
 

BlackVert

15 Year Member
Oct 3, 2003
5,589
9
98
Bethesda, MD
Oct 29, 2004
#18
  • Oct 29, 2004
  • #18
the latest muscle mustangs mag has an article on the differences.

if i ever get boosted, i'm going turbo.
 

Killercanary

The car that set the bar.
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,676
1
76
Altoona, PA
Oct 30, 2004
#19
  • Oct 30, 2004
  • #19
ponypowa2 said:
Im not the most knowledgeable person on the subject, but dont mustangs produce good low end torque, what would be the point of putting a turbo on a car that is not designed for higher rpms or even a top speed? Wouldn't the supercharger make more sense?
Click to expand...


With that kind of thought, the turbo is the MUCH better choise. A vortech and all centrifical blowers make boost relative to rpms since they are belt driven. ie, the more rpms the motor is running, the faster the blower is running, and therefore making more boost. An S trim set up for 8lbs of boost at say 6000rpms will only make like 2psi at 3000rpms (this is just an example, a lot of variables come into play with boost as boost is a measurement of backpressure, not air flow). A turbo on the other hand makes boost via spent exhaust gases, so it "can" make full boost at say 2500rpms and carry that boost throughout the entire rpm range. So take a stock mustang for example, they are usually out of steam by 5200rpms. Adding a centrifical blower to that car will not yeild a lot of power throughout much of the rpm range since it is such a small one, it will make a lot better power from ~4500-up as more boost is made, but this same car will make a ton more power in the area below say 4500 because it will be able to make max boost at those relatively low rpms, yet it will keep making that boost up where the cent. blower is at its max. Basically you'll have more area under the curve and the turbo car will be faster. Hope that makes sense...
 

NIN

New Member
Dec 4, 2002
452
0
0
moorhead MN
Oct 30, 2004
#20
  • Oct 30, 2004
  • #20
does that vortech come with injectors, mass air, or a decent fuel pump. I don't know if I want to be running off of my stock equipment just with the aid of a t-rex. This is a street car and the torque of a turbo excites me.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

9
WTB: Procharger or Vortech Supercharger – 1996–1998 Mustang GT 4.6 2V – Budget $3,200
  • 96mustang.gt
  • Nov 20, 2025
  • Want to Buy
Replies
1
Views
289
Want to Buy May 3, 2026
roblabsn95
R
Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
45
Views
2K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 4, 2026
nickyb
H
'86 New Turbo Build First Start/Idle Trouble. Full Tune specs attached
  • Heffay
  • Jul 10, 2022
  • Digital Self-tuning Forum
Replies
8
Views
3K
Digital Self-tuning Forum Jul 12, 2022
Heffay
H
Swap or Build?
  • Cammer429
  • Oct 10, 2020
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
3K
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Oct 18, 2020
weendoggy
Planned Cross Country Run - 65 Fastback
  • Smokinstang65
  • Aug 17, 2021
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
4K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 27, 2022
Baron von K 289
B
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?