• Community Forums
  • Regional Forums and Event Information

Seahawks

  • Thread starter Thread starter MyFordsFly
  • Start date Start date Jan 14, 2007
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
M

MyFordsFly

Founding Member
Oct 29, 2001
151
1
18
Jan 14, 2007
#1
  • Jan 14, 2007
  • #1
 

SVTdriver

Founding Member
Sep 2, 2001
3,319
0
0
Seattle Wa
Jan 14, 2007
#2
  • Jan 14, 2007
  • #2
Yeah they lost. But at least they made a great showing. And were the first team in 5 years to lose the superbowl and make the playoffs. Oh wait the team that lost the superbowl didn't make the playoffs.
 
B

BadTony

New Member
Apr 29, 2005
17
0
2
Vancouver
Jan 14, 2007
#3
  • Jan 14, 2007
  • #3
da bears !
 

BLK_DVL

New Member
Sep 18, 2003
337
0
0
Hillsboro, Or
Jan 14, 2007
#4
  • Jan 14, 2007
  • #4
BadTony said:
da bears !
Click to expand...

I agree, think my neighbors think Im crazy after they heard me screaming after Gould hit the 50 yard game winner.
 

droid#83853

carfax for friendship
Dec 30, 2006
28
0
0
Beating my car to death with a tire iron
Jan 14, 2007
#5
  • Jan 14, 2007
  • #5
The world famous Choke-hawks. I didn't really care who won that game. And kickers still get no respect. The teams today are so good, it is always coming down to the kicker.
 

LordMustangGT

Member
Jan 9, 2006
118
0
17
Port Orchard, WA
Jan 14, 2007
#6
  • Jan 14, 2007
  • #6
**** happens
 

The Factor

New Member
Jul 12, 2003
1,485
0
0
beaverton,oregon
Jan 15, 2007
#7
  • Jan 15, 2007
  • #7
Go BEARS, Thats my home town Team . Jessie that might of been me you heard yelling when Gould nailed the field goal and actualy it was 49 yards
 

almostblown

New Member
Dec 16, 2005
109
0
0
Jan 15, 2007
#8
  • Jan 15, 2007
  • #8
The whole season seemed like a fluke. They can thank Romo for their extra post season appearance.

Go Patriots.
 
D

dli1314

New Member
Aug 14, 2006
1
0
1
Jan 15, 2007
#9
  • Jan 15, 2007
  • #9
i love how everyone says that without romo's choke the seahawks would have lost.

did no one notice that there was time left on the clock? give me a break. seahawks still could have pulled it off, even if romo didnt choke.

seahawks won that game on their own.

against the bears....seahawks lost it more than the bears won it.

0 for 7 on 3rd and less than 3 yards. sad. the bears defense is NOT that good.

secondary blew it giving up insanely lucky 68 yard pass.

again, seahawks lost it more than the bears won it
 

almostblown

New Member
Dec 16, 2005
109
0
0
Jan 15, 2007
#10
  • Jan 15, 2007
  • #10
Oh yeah, much like how the Seahawks still could have won it against the Bears with time winding down but they choked? All they needed was a few more yards to put Brown in his kicking range and he failed misserably. I do not believe The Hawks could have came back to win.

Hasselbeck is not a good crunch time QB. Hes not that good of a QB altogether.
 

SVTdriver

Founding Member
Sep 2, 2001
3,319
0
0
Seattle Wa
Jan 16, 2007
#11
  • Jan 16, 2007
  • #11
almostblown said:
Oh yeah, much like how the Seahawks still could have won it against the Bears with time winding down but they choked? All they needed was a few more yards to put Brown in his kicking range and he failed misserably. I do not believe The Hawks could have came back to win.

Hasselbeck is not a good crunch time QB. Hes not that good of a QB altogether.
Click to expand...

I would say he is more consistant than Rex Grossman was. How do you say "I didn't prepare for the game". That's his job.
 

The Factor

New Member
Jul 12, 2003
1,485
0
0
beaverton,oregon
Jan 16, 2007
#12
  • Jan 16, 2007
  • #12
dli1314 said:
i love how everyone says that without romo's choke the seahawks would have lost.

did no one notice that there was time left on the clock? give me a break. seahawks still could have pulled it off, even if romo didnt choke.

seahawks won that game on their own.

against the bears....seahawks lost it more than the bears won it.

0 for 7 on 3rd and less than 3 yards. sad. the bears defense is NOT that good.

secondary blew it giving up insanely lucky 68 yard pass.

again, seahawks lost it more than the bears won it
Click to expand...

Coulda woulda shooda , Well lets see hmmmm 0 for 7 on 3rd and less than 3yards. I think there defence was pretty good that night Bottom line they won and didnt choke. I have to admit I dont follow football all year round until the playoffs so im not that well versed as some but you dont have to be a rocket scientist to read between the lines.... no punt intended
 

ddonaca351

Active Member
Dec 1, 2002
2,055
1
48
Camas Washington
Jan 17, 2007
#13
  • Jan 17, 2007
  • #13
The Bears defensive stats were better through the first half of the season (untill Grossman started putting them on the field for an extra 10-15 min / game) than the world champs with Dent, McMichael, Singeltary, etc.... so they are much better than most give them credit for.

Da'Bears!

DD
 

The Factor

New Member
Jul 12, 2003
1,485
0
0
beaverton,oregon
Jan 17, 2007
#14
  • Jan 17, 2007
  • #14
ddonaca351 said:
The Bears defensive stats were better through the first half of the season (untill Grossman started putting them on the field for an extra 10-15 min / game) than the world champs with Dent, McMichael, Singeltary, etc.... so they are much better than most give them credit for.

Da'Bears!

DD
Click to expand...

Wright on Whens there next game saturday or sunday ? I have to watch it When I Was a kid back in chicago well just a few miles from chicago in a suburb called Arlington heights I used to live wright next door to Walter Payton that used to play for the bears as im sure you already know but anyway he was so kool what a nice guy and very down to earth even though he was like a celeberty. He would sign footballs and just give them away, I really wish I had one now. What shame he past away . Anyway go Bears
 

Repostyle

Member
Jun 11, 2005
538
0
16
Portland, OR
Jan 18, 2007
#15
  • Jan 18, 2007
  • #15
dli1314 said:
i love how everyone says that without romo's choke the seahawks would have lost.

did no one notice that there was time left on the clock? give me a break. seahawks still could have pulled it off, even if romo didnt choke.

seahawks won that game on their own.

against the bears....seahawks lost it more than the bears won it.

0 for 7 on 3rd and less than 3 yards. sad. the bears defense is NOT that good.

secondary blew it giving up insanely lucky 68 yard pass.

again, seahawks lost it more than the bears won it
Click to expand...


Romo droppin' the ball was not the only time the Seahawks lucked out that game... There were plenty of other chances for them to lose. Don't get me wrong, I'm a Seahawks fan, but the Cowboy's let them play the Bears by not puttin' their heads in the game. Again, don't get me wrong, I'll take luck over skill anyday, but they really didn't deserve to get as far as they did.
 

SVTdriver

Founding Member
Sep 2, 2001
3,319
0
0
Seattle Wa
Jan 19, 2007
#16
  • Jan 19, 2007
  • #16
Repostyle said:
Romo droppin' the ball was not the only time the Seahawks lucked out that game... There were plenty of other chances for them to lose. Don't get me wrong, I'm a Seahawks fan, but the Cowboy's let them play the Bears by not puttin' their heads in the game. Again, don't get me wrong, I'll take luck over skill anyday, but they really didn't deserve to get as far as they did.
Click to expand...


Call it luck call it what you want. Sometimes the football gods smile on you. Sometimes the other team scores despite being 2 yards away from the goal line. Personally I think they deserved what they got. If the cowboys played poorly. You cannot be down on the seahawks for taking advantage.
 

The Factor

New Member
Jul 12, 2003
1,485
0
0
beaverton,oregon
Jan 21, 2007
#17
  • Jan 21, 2007
  • #17
THE CHICAGO BEARS ROCK NFC Champions
 

The Factor

New Member
Jul 12, 2003
1,485
0
0
beaverton,oregon
Jan 22, 2007
#18
  • Jan 22, 2007
  • #18
 

tehnick

New Member
Nov 9, 2005
56
0
0
Beaverton, OR
Jan 22, 2007
#19
  • Jan 22, 2007
  • #19
Repostyle said:
Romo droppin' the ball was not the only time the Seahawks lucked out that game... There were plenty of other chances for them to lose. Don't get me wrong, I'm a Seahawks fan, but the Cowboy's let them play the Bears by not puttin' their heads in the game. Again, don't get me wrong, I'll take luck over skill anyday, but they really didn't deserve to get as far as they did.
Click to expand...
Interesting theory however luck and skill are all tied in together. I'll use this as the example:

Ohio State University
Michigan
Florida
USC

People claimed that the OSU/Michigan game would show who the best was in the NCAA. People claimed that USC was overrated and couldn't touch either Michigan OR OSU but could destroy Florida and that Florida was also way overrated.

Well, OSU beat Michigan. Michigan went to play the "poorly underrated" Trojans who mopped up the field with them. OSU got completely destroyed by Florida, yet Florida was clearly the least favorite. People were so convinced that OSU would destroy the Gators. Now people are all like OS-WHO? I would like to see a Florida/USC matchup out of curiosity. This also left out Boise State out of any BIG bowl picture with a completely perfect record, the only team in the NCAA to go completely undefeated. True, they played a bunch of nobodies except for Oregon State and Oklahoma in their bowl game but they still proved that they were worthy of a shot when the BCS analyzes numbers. How did they get left out? It's a bit odd.

It's all tied in together in one way or another. Some teams have good days, some have bad. People make mistakes and others cash in on it. Another example is the botched Oregon VS Oklahoma game. Oklahoma won that game if you factor in the botched call that should not have happened, but it did and neither team was at fault for it. However, Oregon was able to capitalize on it and Oklahoma was not able to stop them. So, in all reality Oklahoma flubbed up and got dominated. However, that bad call must have been a morale killer for OU.

I know I would feel pretty pissed off, I would feel cheated, and I would feel down which might affect my game play. It's hard to shake off something like that and Oregon was able to dominate at the last minute when it counted (when it shouldn't have) and ended up showing us some amazing game play. If they would have been that consistent all season as they were the last few minutes of that game, we could have seen them in one of the top bowl games. They started playing very well but their game play went down the toilet. It happens to everyone and it happened to Romo. It's a part of the game. One could argue that Romo made a mistake, one could argue that Seattle got lucky as hell.
 

wicked93

5 Year Member
Nov 2, 2003
480
18
28
Winona Ohio
Jan 22, 2007
#20
  • Jan 22, 2007
  • #20
Go Dolphins
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

H
Forced Induction On3 Turbo Kit- Parts list NEEDED - 302 Stock Motor
  • Hirothecool1
  • Feb 27, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 7, 2026
slow84lx
S
C
Engine Cold start RPM surge being cut short.
  • CTEyoungboy
  • Feb 10, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
14
Views
569
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Feb 12, 2025
gkomo
M
Drivetrain 5 speed will not shift at all
  • Meadecomustang
  • Mar 4, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
17
Views
840
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 29, 2025
AeroCoupe
B
Rear end binding
  • Brian1423
  • Mar 15, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
717
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 18, 2024
nickyb
M
Anyone know what this could be? Quite heavy, behind driveshaft flange by trans.
  • milky_toast
  • Feb 23, 2024
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
649
2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk- Feb 23, 2024
milky_toast
M
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Community Forums
  • Regional Forums and Event Information
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?