• Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech

SHAKER 1000 OR SHAKER 500?????

  • Thread starter Thread starter sasscuba
  • Start date Start date Nov 24, 2004
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

biznazion

New Member
Apr 2, 2005
15
0
0
Northern CA
Jun 8, 2005
#21
  • Jun 8, 2005
  • #21
I decided to get the shaker 1000. I listened to both at the dealer and while the price is a little high I think, the fact that it's stock and sounded good (I'm not fanatical about sound) sold it. If you are on the fence about spending the money - you really need to listen to it before making your choice.
 
S

steelwindmachin

New Member
Feb 22, 2003
33
0
0
Eatontown, NJ
Jun 8, 2005
#22
  • Jun 8, 2005
  • #22
what are the front/rear speaker sizes for the Shaker 500 system?
 

BadAndy72

New Member
May 22, 2005
17
0
0
Jun 8, 2005
#23
  • Jun 8, 2005
  • #23
I got the S1000 because it was an option on the car and I didn't order the car; given a choice I would have saved my money and applied it towards an aftermarket system. Overall I'm not disappointed with it (other than the skipping problem) but you can get higher quality components & you can dynamat the panels while you're installing the system to improve sound quality and reduce road noise.
 
N

Norman.B

New Member
Apr 1, 2005
18
0
0
SC, Greer
Jun 8, 2005
#24
  • Jun 8, 2005
  • #24
Ford still has problems with the Stereo system, (skipping or rejecting CD's) I'll take the 500 and hopefully will work good for you.
 
S

subzero05

New Member
Dec 21, 2004
190
0
0
Jun 8, 2005
#25
  • Jun 8, 2005
  • #25
As a former stereo installer for al & eds autosound back in the day I can honestly say the 1000 is probably the BEST stock system I have heard in a car.Now for the extra $$ you can get yourself something better most likely, but for me I choose the 1000 because I don't want to be tearing into the car audio wise anymore and it is a very satisfying audio system IMO
 

T1ckT0ck

New Member
Jun 27, 2005
17
0
0
DC
Jul 8, 2005
#26
  • Jul 8, 2005
  • #26
The Shaker 500 was plenty enough for me, some people like the 1000 but I am happy with the 500. Just personal preference if you ask me, if you like it, get it.
 
C

CPman

New Member
Apr 2, 2005
129
0
0
Jul 9, 2005
#27
  • Jul 9, 2005
  • #27
The rear speakers are 5X7/6X8. the front is a three way setup. The large bottom speakers are 7" woofers mounted to the door panel that has a built in bass enclosure, the top location is an self contained enclosure with an 3" or 4" midrange with a tweeter that is mounted to an adapter bracket that in turn is fastened to the door. This adapter bracket looks like it would fit a 5X7 or 6X8 fullrange speaker if the mid and tweeter enclosure was removed. Mine said Mach 460 on it. There is is probably crossovers built into the factory amp system, so be careful when upgrading. The woofers are 1.3 ohms- 60X2 watts and the rears are 4ohm 25 watt.
 

FIRE GT

New Member
May 10, 2005
8
0
0
Jul 9, 2005
#28
  • Jul 9, 2005
  • #28
I went with the 500... Plenty of sound for me... plus the trunk gets a lot smaller with the 1000.
 

TAP4636

New Member
Nov 28, 2004
99
0
0
Chicago
Jul 12, 2005
#29
  • Jul 12, 2005
  • #29
I believe there is a TSB out there to fix the CD skipping rejecting problem.

I have the Shaker 1000. It was already on the car, and when I got it, it was the only silver GT in Chicago. Fully-loaded.
 
S

swieduwi

New Member
Jul 13, 2005
11
0
0
Northern Virginia
Jul 31, 2005
#30
  • Jul 31, 2005
  • #30
Dump Both The Skippers are made from a Jenson Knockoff in Mexico. Pure crap.
I ordered my 2005 GT with the Plain Radio in it then installed a Pioneer AVIC-D1 Nav system, Boston Accustic Speakers, and Alpine Amps and a 12 inch Scosche Sub from cruchfields that is made for the Mustang Trunk. And it rocks.

My Goal it to get an Automatic Trans GT into the mid to High 12's under 2 grand and with bolt on mods (non mechanic type mods). Can it be done?
---------- MODS to Date -----------
2005 Mustang GT w/ automatic Trans.
K&N Air Charger intake
Underdrive Pulley
Plasma Booster Ignition
SCT XCalibrator Tunning
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

N
1969 15x10 295's for rear. Modifications needed?
  • normg
  • May 1, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
157
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- May 2, 2026
GypsyR
G
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 95 GT/Saleen Supercharged 331 install
  • from6to8
  • Mar 22, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
895
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
Considering widening my rear wheels, would like to verify my thoughts on fitment
  • 2000xp8
  • Jul 9, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
374
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Wednesday at 12:30 PM
FastDriver
G
In expensive ceramic coating
  • gray owl
  • Jul 12, 2026
  • Mustang Sound & Shine All
Replies
4
Views
96
Mustang Sound & Shine All Thursday at 9:49 PM
Noobz347
B
Screamin Demons Worth It N/A?
  • Blackout67
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
268
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Oct 20, 2025
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?