• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Shelby GT good move by Ford or bad

  • Thread starter Thread starter Engel
  • Start date Start date Dec 6, 2006

Shelby GT Impressions

  • Its hot and will sell!! 325hp STOCK ROCK ON!!

    Votes: 6 19.4%
  • I am not going to shell out extra $$$ for a mere 25hp over the gt model

    Votes: 17 54.8%
  • I dont give a damn about the car or this poll

    Votes: 8 25.8%

  • Total voters
    31
  • Poll closed Dec 26, 2006.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
1 of 3 Next Last

Engel

Member
Apr 2, 2005
219
0
16
Currently Fort Walton Beach
Dec 6, 2006
#1
  • Dec 6, 2006
  • #1
http://www.stangnet.com/Ford-Mustan...y-GT-Production-Begins-in-January-061206.html
 

Guero

Active Member
Oct 11, 2005
2,148
0
47
Dec 6, 2006
#2
  • Dec 6, 2006
  • #2
+25 on the shelby i think thats gay! I bet its gonna cost at least 5 g's more. i wouldn't buy it. And it dont look that good.
 

'66 coupe

Founding Member
Aug 7, 2000
1,202
9
59
Lakeland, Fl.
www.sounddomain.com
Dec 6, 2006
#3
  • Dec 6, 2006
  • #3
I'm against any Ford new Mustang with a Shelby name. IMO, the new GT500 should be wearing SVT badges. Those people worked hard on developing that car, and Shelby slaps his name on it and gets a check from Ford. That's !!!

At least Don Yenko died before he could whore his name out. Not saying I wish Shelby was dead; but he had his place in the Mustangs history at it should've ended in '67(Ford took over in '68). Steve Saleen customizes the cars in his own shop. If Ford's just gonna slap people's names on cars THEY BUILD as packages, where's the Bob Tasca Fusion or Don Garlits Montego. Sounds stupid, doesn't it?
 

mootang

New Member
Dec 5, 2004
907
0
0
40
texas
Dec 6, 2006
#4
  • Dec 6, 2006
  • #4
it said in the article that its only a 2k markup witch supprised me.
 

Engel

Member
Apr 2, 2005
219
0
16
Currently Fort Walton Beach
Dec 7, 2006
#5
  • Dec 7, 2006
  • #5
only 2k markup that would suprise me, why didnt they just make the 2007 mustang 325hp.. would have looked better anyway, and its marked up already
 

SeventyMach1

Keep it lubed .... keep it straight .... and keep
Mar 30, 2005
1,940
3
36
43
North Carolina
www.xtrememustangs.com
Dec 7, 2006
#6
  • Dec 7, 2006
  • #6
This reminds me of the Shinoda group now that they seem more of a decal company, lol. How you gonna NOT increase performance for true enthusiasts? They could give some kind of incentive, you know? At least Ford is not abusing the "Boss" name ...... YET.
 
R

Rookie71

Member
Jul 25, 2006
28
7
19
Dec 7, 2006
#7
  • Dec 7, 2006
  • #7
I think it was a good move by Ford. They are sucking wind and the mustang is one of the few things that is going right for ford. Although reception by diehard mustang enthusiests has been mediocre, the general public can't get enough of the mustang. Dodge hit a homerun with reintroducing the "Hemi" label even though out of the box those cars make the portly GT500 looks anorexic. It is all about sales.
 

94CobraPace

Founding Member
Aug 30, 2000
907
1
0
Houston, Tx.
Dec 7, 2006
#8
  • Dec 7, 2006
  • #8
I think it was a good move. The older baby boomers who grew up with the muscle cars & Shelby will eat this up, the ones who cannot afford the GT500. It is a good way to hype up the cars.
I think the Califonia Special will be a good seller also.
 

Killercanary

The car that set the bar.
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,676
1
76
Altoona, PA
www.angelfire.com
Dec 7, 2006
#9
  • Dec 7, 2006
  • #9
I'd like to save judgement on it until I knew exactly what they changed on it. I will admit the looks are lacking to me. I think its bull that every 2nd car ordered must be an auto. BOO!
 

ProKiller

Founding Member
Apr 26, 2002
3,064
15
78
PA
Dec 7, 2006
#10
  • Dec 7, 2006
  • #10
Killercanary said:
I'd like to save judgement on it until I knew exactly what they changed on it. I will admit the looks are lacking to me. I think its bull that every 2nd car ordered must be an auto. BOO!
Click to expand...

i was thinking the same thing. i can't really say whether i think its a good or bad move. it's both to me. if it helps them boost sales then it was worth it. i would never buy one, but out of the box its probably a good start to a faster mustang.
 

trav_19

New Member
Oct 29, 2006
810
0
0
Jackson, MI
Dec 7, 2006
#11
  • Dec 7, 2006
  • #11
i dont like it and the gt/cs sucks too. i would just stick with a gt if i were to ever buy an 05-07. i dont know though i sat in one and i felt all cramped in the drivers seat and it turned me against them. they look alright, it was a big hype when they first came out but i dont know im over that fade i like the 94-98, and the 99-04 a lot better i dont think ford put out a good looking car since the mach 1.....thats not an svt vehicle right? haha
 

madmatt

Ellis Juan sympathizer
Founding Member
Dec 28, 2002
465
0
16
38
Lexington, SC
Dec 7, 2006
#12
  • Dec 7, 2006
  • #12
Its only about a 2,000 dollar increase in price, granted the dealer markup isnt nuts. I think its a great idea personally.
 

swingline

New Member
Sep 18, 2003
1,252
0
0
TCB - Taking Care of Business
Dec 7, 2006
#13
  • Dec 7, 2006
  • #13
Buy a regular GT and use that $2,000 towards a blower.
 

'66 coupe

Founding Member
Aug 7, 2000
1,202
9
59
Lakeland, Fl.
www.sounddomain.com
Dec 7, 2006
#14
  • Dec 7, 2006
  • #14
Rookie71 said:
I think it was a good move by Ford. They are sucking wind and the mustang is one of the few things that is going right for ford. Although reception by diehard mustang enthusiests has been mediocre, the general public can't get enough of the mustang. Dodge hit a homerun with reintroducing the "Hemi" label even though out of the box those cars make the portly GT500 looks anorexic. It is all about sales.
Click to expand...

Good point. It just sucks that Ford has to stoop this low. They've built some awesome concept cars, but their production cars are just boring. Ford has some awesome engineers like the ones that built the 351 V10 Mustang, and the One Lap Crown Vic. Too bad their bosses are a bunch of retards.
 

95Vert

New Member
Aug 19, 2004
1,785
0
0
43
North Mexico (deep south Texas)
Dec 7, 2006
#15
  • Dec 7, 2006
  • #15
I agree with Trav, there was/is a big hype about them but I got over pretty quickly. I would rather own a sn 95 like I do. And I'm not saying that cause I own one. 25FWhp is not worth $2g for me.
 

'66 coupe

Founding Member
Aug 7, 2000
1,202
9
59
Lakeland, Fl.
www.sounddomain.com
Dec 7, 2006
#16
  • Dec 7, 2006
  • #16
95Vert said:
25FWhp is not worth $2g for me.
Click to expand...

I think 94Cobrapace put it best by saying that it's for the Babyboomers.
They're not the brightest bunch; this the generation that was pissed to find out tv game shows were rigged, they believed Ralph Nader when he attacked the Corvair, and later bought into the Pinto accusations without knowing the facts.
If anyone is dumb enough to pay $2,000 for Shelby badges, it's them.
 

95Vert

New Member
Aug 19, 2004
1,785
0
0
43
North Mexico (deep south Texas)
Dec 7, 2006
#17
  • Dec 7, 2006
  • #17
lol^
 

WhiteStallionGT

Member
Aug 19, 2004
465
0
17
Northern VA / VT
Dec 7, 2006
#18
  • Dec 7, 2006
  • #18
Shelby is a pos and will market anything. He doesn't care if it's for the good of the public, he's only in it for the money. But I think it looks pretty good.
 

Therian

The Highlander
Founding Member
Apr 21, 2002
0
1
0
Waterloo, Ontario
Dec 7, 2006
#19
  • Dec 7, 2006
  • #19
I think some of you guys are missing the point on this one

First off, Ford isn't modifying this, Shelby is...There's no way Ford would be able to do something like this in house. Ford produces GTs, Shelby modifies them and gets them out on the market (with the help of Ford dealerships obviously)...this is the same way it used to work back in the sixties.

Secondly, this is being offered because there's a lot of people that can't own a GT500, but like the status of the Shelby. There's nothing wrong with that. It's a sound economic move, and you would do the same thing if you were in their place.

Third, It's not just 25 more horsepower, there's a decent amount of suspension modifications also done. New springs, new shocks and struts, added swaybar. Plus 18inch rims, a new exhaust and x pipe, and higher rear end gears. Doesn't add to performance, but there's also a new front fascia.

I'd pay another $2000 for it

Anyone that thinks that Carrol Shelby is greedy and is only in it for the money is sadly mistaken. He has all the money he needs...something tells me he just likes cars. Do you seriously think, at his age, that all he wants is money...I seriously doubt it.


This is a solid move, and it's a sexy car.

 

'66 coupe

Founding Member
Aug 7, 2000
1,202
9
59
Lakeland, Fl.
www.sounddomain.com
Dec 7, 2006
#20
  • Dec 7, 2006
  • #20
Okay...But they're not building the GT500's.
 
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
1 of 3 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

H
Ongoing Battle With Hydraulic Lifters
  • hailer06
  • Jun 8, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
300
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 9, 2026
Noobz347
B
97 GT with 03 explorer Eddie Bauer edition 4.6l
  • basbill73
  • May 10, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
68
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- May 11, 2026
squeak93
T
What's it Worth? 2002 GT conv/auto
  • tonydetesta
  • Jan 7, 2026
  • What is it Worth?!?!?
Replies
3
Views
648
What is it Worth?!?!? Jan 21, 2026
Mustang5L5
What's your tow rig?
  • LILCBRA
  • May 31, 2026
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
3
Views
139
Other Auto Tech May 31, 2026
LILCBRA
Y
Engine 1994 Ford Mustang Gt Rod Knock/Stuck Lifter
  • yaboity
  • Jun 7, 2025
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
2
Views
276
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jun 8, 2025
AeroCoupe
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?