• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

SHelby trademark applys to fiberglass

  • Thread starter Thread starter strange65
  • Start date Start date Apr 26, 2006
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
S

strange65

New Member
Dec 28, 2005
71
0
0
Apr 26, 2006
#1
  • Apr 26, 2006
  • #1
Apparently his trademark extends to fiberglass reproduction parts as seen on this ebay ad: http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/1968...ewItemQQcategoryZ34204QQitemZ4634495315QQrdZ1

This is a brand new Cobra Fiberglass 1968 Shelby GT350/500 style Fiberglass hood assembly for your 1967-1968 Ford Mustang! This is a unique molding in that it REQUIRES NO OTHER MODIFICATIONS (NOSE PIECE, ETC.) It is a direct bolt on assembly made by the best in the business, Cobra Fiberglass MFG. Don't pay big money for the junk that fiberglass that you have to fix before you install! THIS PIECE IS THE FINAL ONE, due to the new Shelby trademark policy going into affect this summer. (Mr. Shelby has decided that all pieces related to the cars he produced must be purchased directly from his company, and proof of a Shelby VIN will be require to obtain parts.)

Maybe MDJAY can verify this.
 
T

ttoney

Member
Sep 12, 2005
195
0
16
Denver
Apr 26, 2006
#2
  • Apr 26, 2006
  • #2
That could get painful real quick.
 

DukeGnarley

Member
Apr 2, 2003
597
2
19
43
Auburn/Ellensburg, Wa
Apr 26, 2006
#3
  • Apr 26, 2006
  • #3
sounds like a load of bs to me.
 
T

ttoney

Member
Sep 12, 2005
195
0
16
Denver
Apr 26, 2006
#4
  • Apr 26, 2006
  • #4
I was wondering about that as a scare tactic. Get some guys like us to load up before the prohibition....
 

1320stang

Founding Member
Nov 13, 1998
4,329
23
89
59
Edmond, Oklahoma
community.webshots.com
Apr 26, 2006
#5
  • Apr 26, 2006
  • #5
Well, seeing how that hood never appeared on a Shelby Mustang in that form (the real one had a different nose piece, just as the '67 ones were extended), I don't see how that piece could be considered a Shelby piece. It's similar, less, but not a copy of any original Shelby piece.
 
S

strange65

New Member
Dec 28, 2005
71
0
0
Apr 26, 2006
#6
  • Apr 26, 2006
  • #6
1320stang said:
Well, seeing how that hood never appeared on a Shelby Mustang in that form (the real one had a different nose piece, just as the '67 ones were extended), I don't see how that piece could be considered a Shelby piece. It's similar, less, but not a copy of any original Shelby piece.
Click to expand...

I was thinking along the same lines, but if I was manufacturing them and got threatened with a legal suit I would just stop making them. With the demand for the hoods and and the cost of legal counsel it be a no brainer for me.
 
1

180 Out

Member
Jul 23, 2005
375
0
16
Apr 26, 2006
#7
  • Apr 26, 2006
  • #7
IMHO this ebayer is resorting to the age-old seller's trick of trying to create a false sense of scarcity. Shelby and Ford already sued Superperformance over their Cobra clones and lost, because the marketplace no longer sees Shelby or Ford as the sole manufacturer of a car with that trade dress.

Also, Ford had negligently failed to trademarked the intellectual property. The reason I believe this same oversight applies to the GT350/GT500 body cladding pieces is that I find it hard to believe that Ford or Shelby American/Shelby Automotive have held a good trademark to the body parts and have been sitting back for 40 years letting third parties make a buck off it without paying royalties.
 

stangonline

Member
Feb 22, 2003
318
0
16
www.stangonline.com
Apr 26, 2006
#8
  • Apr 26, 2006
  • #8
Possibly, but I did email back and forth recently with Branda - and I was told that the cost will be going up about 20% starting in June, due to the "Shelby Issue".

He also mentioned that people selling junk fiberglass will be disposed of? Not sure what that meant.

Jeff
 
R

Ronstang

New Member
Apr 4, 2004
1,294
0
0
63
Houston Texas
Apr 26, 2006
#9
  • Apr 26, 2006
  • #9
stangonline said:
He also mentioned that people selling junk fiberglass will be disposed of? Not sure what that meant.

Jeff
Click to expand...

That means Maier is going to be gone.
 

brianj5600

Active Member
Sep 19, 2003
1,964
2
39
Middle TN
www.cardomain.com
Apr 26, 2006
#10
  • Apr 26, 2006
  • #10
I'm losing even more respect for the poor millionaire?
 

mdjay

Premium Sponsor
Dec 9, 2003
896
0
16
Las Vegas, NV
Apr 26, 2006
#11
  • Apr 26, 2006
  • #11
I know about the emblem issue. Haven't heard much about the glass end. I can't see how you can touch the fiberglass without specific patents. However, they could put a stop on advertising it as a gt350 etc since those are trademarks.

FYI Ford's currently going after everyone with Mustang in their name. Some of our competitor's have made agreements, some have already changed their name. Lot's of troubling news in the industry! We have to see where it all goes...
 
S

strange65

New Member
Dec 28, 2005
71
0
0
Apr 27, 2006
#12
  • Apr 27, 2006
  • #12
According to a friend seems like Shelby and Ford, have what is called a “trade dress,” or appearance patent on all the Shelby mustangs and Eleanores.
Something they did not have on the A.C. Cobra. They are also going after the engine "cobra" kits dress up stuff.
He had no tech for this, but it was just something he heard from a manufacturer.
 

stangonline

Member
Feb 22, 2003
318
0
16
www.stangonline.com
Apr 27, 2006
#13
  • Apr 27, 2006
  • #13
Another thing to note (mdjay, you already know this) is more and more main component pieces are becoming available to be able to basically build a new classic mustang from scratch. All but 3-4 main parts are now available (some pre-assembled into large parts of the car) and I bet those remaining parts will show up in the next 8-12 months. Companies are going to start popping up selling these "kit cars" as mustang/shelbys/whaever - if Ford and Shelby didn't do anything to stop it.

On a positive note - why would they start going through so much trouble to lock down the naming? ...I'd say that it's because there are more Shelby Mustang models coming over the next few years. People might not spend the extra $5000 for a GT-350H, if they knew they could buy the stripes, and every other part aftermarket to build the same car for $3000. It's going to make the name and the "real" car more valuable and desirable.
 

kmterrill

kill joy
Jun 10, 2005
2
1
29
55
Redford, MI
Apr 27, 2006
#14
  • Apr 27, 2006
  • #14
So, you're telling me that I should order my fiberglass ASAP?
 
T

THX 138

Member
Oct 7, 2004
375
0
16
48
Los Angeles
Apr 27, 2006
#15
  • Apr 27, 2006
  • #15
you can't monopolize replacement parts.
 

kmterrill

kill joy
Jun 10, 2005
2
1
29
55
Redford, MI
Apr 27, 2006
#16
  • Apr 27, 2006
  • #16
Okay... So I should be able to still get fiberglass parts, but I might want to order emblems now. Does any one know which emblems? Is it anything with a Cobra or just with Shelby, GT350 and GT500?
 

chepsk8

Founding Member
Jan 15, 2001
2,203
3
49
66
Easton, PA
www.chepsk8.stangnet.com
Apr 27, 2006
#17
  • Apr 27, 2006
  • #17
And so many have wondered why I have been dissin' the Old Grouch for a while. Now you see. It's the $$$ he can grab, not the hobby. I hear his latest wife is a gold-digger extraordinaire.

Better go grab every POS Series-1 before the world discovers them too!


(BTW - This rant is MY personal opinion)
 

stangonline

Member
Feb 22, 2003
318
0
16
www.stangonline.com
Apr 27, 2006
#18
  • Apr 27, 2006
  • #18
It's been looking like a sell-out ever since the 500E, IMO.

Maybe this is a little different. Perhaps, realizing that he has fewer years ahead than behind, he wants to solidify the value of the cars that helped make him a legend? How could limiting the availability of Shelby parts make him more money? Just thinking out loud.

I agree with you about it should be more about the hobby than the money, but looking at his entire history - he started out racing cars, then started making them to sell, as a business. He has been making money at this ever since and I have never seen anything other than signed mustang dashs that include him in the hobby. Maybe he is what he is - a business man. Who knows?
 
S

strange65

New Member
Dec 28, 2005
71
0
0
Apr 27, 2006
#19
  • Apr 27, 2006
  • #19
kmterrill said:
So, you're telling me that I should order my fiberglass ASAP?
Click to expand...

No not at all, I have seen nothing, but the ebay ad that states this.
The emblems and the taped stripes, and the engine dress up kits are the only things I know for sure are that were targeted!
 

kmterrill

kill joy
Jun 10, 2005
2
1
29
55
Redford, MI
Apr 27, 2006
#20
  • Apr 27, 2006
  • #20
strange65 said:
No not at all, I have seen nothing, but the ebay ad that states this.
The emblems and the taped stripes, and the engine dress up kits are the only things I know for sure are that were targeted!
Click to expand...

Okay... Emblems and Stripes it is then. Already have the valve covers and oil pan.

On a side note. What about interior items like the 68 center console which has the Cobra logo embroidered into it?
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

G
1983 GLX Convertible 5.0 5-Speed 4BBL 'Barn Find' - 82,000 original miles - Restoration Motivation Needed
  • Grande Luxe X-Factor
  • Oct 7, 2023
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Aug 31, 2024
Mac131
Progress Thread 2014 V6 'chelle-b Ii'
  • Colorado66
  • Aug 26, 2017
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
30
Views
8K
2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk- Feb 20, 2019
Noobz347
D
  • Locked
Expired '09 Shelby Gt500, 73k, $8,500, Nesbit, Ms Salvage But Drivetrain Is Good
  • David Rust
  • Jun 27, 2017
  • S197 Mustangs For Sale (2005-14)
Replies
3
Views
2K
S197 Mustangs For Sale (2005-14) Jun 28, 2017
David Rust
D
Awesome 1969 Shelby Gt500 Barn Find For Auction
  • MRaburn
  • Mar 25, 2014
  • StangNet Site News
Replies
0
Views
3K
StangNet Site News Mar 25, 2014
MRaburn
A
Buyer Beware: Wilwood Aero4 Rear Big Brake Kit Parking Failure
  • absoffthewake
  • Aug 9, 2015
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
6K
2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk- Sep 2, 2015
absoffthewake
A
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?