• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Shorty headers, with RPM kit installed on a 289

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bosscat
  • Start date Start date May 15, 2007

Bosscat

Founding Member
Sep 30, 1999
1,265
0
0
England
May 15, 2007
#1
  • May 15, 2007
  • #1
Are shorty headers worth the money, if I have the stock heads? The intake and cam have been changed out with an Edelbrock RPM kit, but they left the heads stock. Has any done this swap, if so was it worth the money? I have the engine pulled at the moment, so I figure this would be the best time to do it. I was going to install a 2 1/2 inch exhaust system as well.

Cheers,
Tony
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
May 15, 2007
#2
  • May 15, 2007
  • #2
Unless you already have the 289 Hi-po Manifolds, headers are always a good idea.
 

Bosscat

Founding Member
Sep 30, 1999
1,265
0
0
England
May 15, 2007
#3
  • May 15, 2007
  • #3
They're the stock ones.
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
May 15, 2007
#4
  • May 15, 2007
  • #4
With shorty's, you have the option of doing these with the engine in the car. Not hard to install. Even some long tube 4 into 1's can be easy. I just did this with my 77 Comet, the Hedman 88300's slid right into place from under the car with the engine raised off the mounts. You might also consider the Shelby type Tri-Y's as well.
 

Max Power

Active Member
Jul 31, 2003
1,774
1
36
St Paul
May 15, 2007
#5
  • May 15, 2007
  • #5
One could argue that the RPM kit isn't worth it with stock heads either.

You will be better off with headers, but won't realize their full potential until you replace the heads.
 

brianj5600

Active Member
Sep 19, 2003
1,964
2
39
Middle TN
May 15, 2007
#6
  • May 15, 2007
  • #6
I would ditch the stock manifolds. Heads definately make a difference, but there were good running motors before there was one single aftermarket head. You can get into the 12's with stock heads, so I don't agree that mods are "not worth it w/o" aftermarket heads. I went high 11's on motor and 10.70's with a 200 shot with a 306 and home ported stock valve 351w heads pre-aftermarket.
 

coolblue65

Founding Member
Jul 26, 1999
1,224
2
39
Algonquin, IL
May 15, 2007
#7
  • May 15, 2007
  • #7
I would seriously consider going with long-tube headers unless you already have the shorties on hand.

I ran the RPM kit with stock heads for awhile and the car ran great- but the Trick Flow heads did really wake the car up, when I finally had the money to put them on.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

C
Need MIL Eliminators?
  • crazyone64
  • May 18, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
158
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech May 21, 2026
GOvert
G
R
bbk shorty header to mid pipe gasket
  • randyyy
  • Sep 29, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
353
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Sep 29, 2025
randyyy
R
W
I have some 4.6 questions.
  • whiskerz
  • Nov 14, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
5
Views
288
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Nov 25, 2025
squeak93
A
Discussion on mild budget build/ top end
  • Acesario
  • Feb 21, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
732
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 23, 2026
General karthief
C
SN95 Another Coyote swap list
  • catkiller
  • May 10, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
127
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 10, 2026
catkiller
C
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?