• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

should I switch from 3:55 to 3:73 gears with new mods??

  • Thread starter Thread starter 1993whtstang
  • Start date Start date Apr 28, 2012

1993whtstang

Member
Aug 2, 2011
146
5
18
Massachusetts
Apr 28, 2012
#1
  • Apr 28, 2012
  • #1
My mechanic just installed new 3:55 gears with all new bearings and a new traction lock housing about 5 months ago. I also installed a new ford racing cradle rear end cover.

I am going to be installing a trick flow top end kit with headers, 75mm throttle body, new MAF, 24 lb injectors, 255 lph fuel pump,etc. Should I put a set of 3:73 gears in or just keep the 3:55's in?? Would I motice a big difference between the two?? I only am going to be using this to street cruise and maybe the track once or twice a year for an amature run. I hate to pay to have the gears swapped out again, but if it will make a huge difference I could be convinced!

Any info is appreciated!
 

NIKwoaC

中國製造
15 Year Member
Oct 31, 2006
5,525
943
214
Chengdu Province
Apr 29, 2012
#2
  • Apr 29, 2012
  • #2
There is really only about a 5% difference between the two sets of gears, so considering you just had the 3.55s installed, I would put money elsewhere. I think bang-for-the-buck, you'd be wasting money, especially if you're paying someone to do it.
 
Reactions: fiveohwblow

fiveohwblow

Official Member
15 Year Member
Jul 21, 2005
2,169
145
155
Apr 29, 2012
#3
  • Apr 29, 2012
  • #3
NIKwoaC said:
There is really only about a 5% difference between the two sets of gears, so considering you just had the 3.55s installed, I would put money elsewhere. I think bang-for-the-buck, you'd be wasting money, especially if you're paying someone to do it.
Click to expand...
I second this. Most people will say things like "dont fear the gear" etc etc but this comes from a pure drag racing and stickier than reasonable tire perspective. Save your money and stick with the 3.55's.
 

1993whtstang

Member
Aug 2, 2011
146
5
18
Massachusetts
Apr 29, 2012
#4
  • Apr 29, 2012
  • #4
thats what I was hoping, I was just concerned about over reving, thanks for the opinions guys!
 

NIKwoaC

中國製造
15 Year Member
Oct 31, 2006
5,525
943
214
Chengdu Province
Apr 29, 2012
#5
  • Apr 29, 2012
  • #5
Yea, I mean I don't know how much your mechanic charges to install gears, but I would guess parts+labor would be around a grand. That's more than halfway into a supercharger or a stroker kit, both of which would be way better payoff than going from 3.55s to 3.73s.

Don't get me wrong, I'd normally support 3.73s, but I think in your case you're better off spending elsewhere.
 

mob

the guy who hits on his mom
20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 3, 2003
2,566
136
104
Dallas, TX
Apr 30, 2012
#6
  • Apr 30, 2012
  • #6
/thread
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Apr 30, 2012
#7
  • Apr 30, 2012
  • #7
1993whtstang said:
thats what I was hoping, I was just concerned about over reving, thanks for the opinions guys!
Click to expand...
You would rev higher with 3.73's, than you would with 3.55's, not lower.

The lower numerically gear ratio's in a street car are to get your car up and moving more quickly. The stock 225hp our cars came with wasn't bad for it's time, but additional gear multiplication is necessary to really get these cars moving from a standstill.

With the mods you're suggesting in your sig, you're effectivley adding about 130hp to the stock output. You'll now pull the 3.55's much harder than you would have back when the engine was stock. Keeping the engine within the sweet spot of it's powerband is more important than maximizing mechanical gearing efficency.

As stated by the others.....the 3.55's are probably the right choice.
 
M

Mark Palmer

Banned
Apr 11, 2012
8
0
1
Apr 30, 2012
#8
  • Apr 30, 2012
  • #8
Good thread, I always like them.

 

jdb3rd

Member
Apr 28, 2005
166
3
19
edgewater MD
Apr 30, 2012
#9
  • Apr 30, 2012
  • #9
Not worth the money to swap at this point especially if you enjoy cruising the streets as well with the car. You didnt mention whether or not you had brake or suspension upgrades but I would definitely address the brakes before another gear change.
 

1993whtstang

Member
Aug 2, 2011
146
5
18
Massachusetts
Apr 30, 2012
#10
  • Apr 30, 2012
  • #10
jdb3rd said:
Not worth the money to swap at this point especially if you enjoy cruising the streets as well with the car. You didnt mention whether or not you had brake or suspension upgrades but I would definitely address the brakes before another gear change.
Click to expand...

Thanks again for the information guys. I do have new front SSBC front slotted rotors , new stock calipers, SSBC brake pads, stainless brake lines, new fluid reservoir, all new front bearings etc. The rears are still drum type, but are brand new. I was new to the fox mustang when I had those done and wasnt aware of the rear disc conversion kits they had. Suspension is all new shocks,new struts,new rear quad shocks, and new eidelbach ront and rear sway bars.
 

jdb3rd

Member
Apr 28, 2005
166
3
19
edgewater MD
Apr 30, 2012
#11
  • Apr 30, 2012
  • #11
Nice man how about subframe connectors
 

1993whtstang

Member
Aug 2, 2011
146
5
18
Massachusetts
Apr 30, 2012
#12
  • Apr 30, 2012
  • #12
jdb3rd said:
Nice man how about subframe connectors
Click to expand...

Yep, welded subframe connectors and front strut tower brace. She is coming together nicely! Ill post some final pics and dyno numbers hopefully within the month.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

M
Resolved 1988 Foxbody - Overheating Summer
  • MDrisc
  • Oct 26, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
16
Views
694
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 17, 2026
fasterthangas
F
3
Eight inches is enough for me...
  • 351MooseStang
  • Nov 27, 2025
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Replies
5
Views
584
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Mar 2, 2026
Bullitt347
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
903
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
New Member with a 1992
  • Clutchfork
  • Oct 18, 2025
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
5
Views
306
The Welcome Wagon Oct 19, 2025
Clutchfork
X
VE Table Not Dialed? Send Me Your Datalog.
  • X-cam34
  • Feb 8, 2026
  • Digital Self-tuning Forum
  • 2 3
Replies
49
Views
1K
Digital Self-tuning Forum May 1, 2026
X-cam34
X
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?