• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

should it be faster?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Neltech
  • Start date Start date May 16, 2011

Neltech

New Member
Apr 13, 2011
40
0
0
May 16, 2011
#1
  • May 16, 2011
  • #1
ok here's what im working with.

87 gt,306,5 speed, speed pro pistons, maf converted. march CAI, bbk 70mm TB, trickflow upper and lower intake, bbk headers, h pipe, flowmaster 40's, msd 6al, 3.55 gears, 6 puck clutch, lightweigh flywheel. fresh plugs. run 91 octane.

it just doesn't feel fast. first and second gear move pretty good at WOT but after that its not really impressive at all. i can't even catch 2nd gear rubber and i'd think that'd be easy with the amount of bolt ons. i can drop the clutch in second and get her sideways if i'm going around a corner but if im on the highway at like 60 and drop it into 3rd it doesn't really slam me back into the seat.

is this normal? my ranger can get a tiny squeak of 2nd gear rubber, my stang should be able to roast em even with ****ty tires.
 

Kdubslugga

Active Member
Jun 7, 2003
1,515
3
38
Akron, OH
May 16, 2011
#2
  • May 16, 2011
  • #2
Only way to tell for sure is head to the track and see what your trap speed is, that will answer all your questions. Spinnin aint winnin anyways. Something to try, have a buddy drive your car with you ridin shotgun. Trust me you get used to your car real quick and it starts to feel slow
 

90fox306

New Member
Mar 20, 2011
126
0
0
East TN
May 17, 2011
#3
  • May 17, 2011
  • #3
To me it does sound a lil under the weather. I wud think it shud have alil uuumph than that considering I cud get my bone stock 89LX sideways in second and grab 3rd. Have you had the car tuned sense you put it together?
 

strattoc

Member
Jan 8, 2011
188
0
16
Cali
May 17, 2011
#4
  • May 17, 2011
  • #4
I can get my 88 with an AOD to grab 2nd and sling it slideways if I get into it good enough with just few bolt-ons.
 

25thmustang

Mustang Master
Sep 5, 2003
2,021
85
99
Montgomery, NY
May 23, 2011
#5
  • May 23, 2011
  • #5
Fun fact:

We went to a burnout competition a few years back. My brothers 1986 GT was up, running 225 radials on 10 hole rims. Car would NOT do a burnout. 6000 RPM, in water, drop the clutch, it would spin, and the tires would grab and the car would lose all RPM. A couple of tries and he gave up.

Car runs 11.7 @ 115 at the track, but you would have never known. Shortly after I too tried to hit the tires (he was dropping the clutch then getting on the brakes) by doing the "heel and toe" method, and sure enough... car would not get the 225s to sit still and spin.

I wouldn't put much into a burnout.
 

hoopty5.0

mechanicus terribilis
15 Year Member
Dec 14, 2010
7,766
6,931
214
SW Houston
May 23, 2011
#6
  • May 23, 2011
  • #6
25thmustang said:
Fun fact:

We went to a burnout competition a few years back. My brothers 1986 GT was up, running 225 radials on 10 hole rims. Car would NOT do a burnout. 6000 RPM, in water, drop the clutch, it would spin, and the tires would grab and the car would lose all RPM. A couple of tries and he gave up.

Car runs 11.7 @ 115 at the track, but you would have never known. Shortly after I too tried to hit the tires (he was dropping the clutch then getting on the brakes) by doing the "heel and toe" method, and sure enough... car would not get the 225s to sit still and spin.

I wouldn't put much into a burnout.
Click to expand...

 

25thmustang

Mustang Master
Sep 5, 2003
2,021
85
99
Montgomery, NY
May 23, 2011
#7
  • May 23, 2011
  • #7
My post was in reference to him worrying about catching 2nd gear rubber, and the fact that tire spin is not always a great indicator of performance...
 

hoopty5.0

mechanicus terribilis
15 Year Member
Dec 14, 2010
7,766
6,931
214
SW Houston
May 23, 2011
#8
  • May 23, 2011
  • #8
Oh, yeah man, I couldn't agree more.

I was scratching my head about a 11 sec capable car not being able to spin the tires. Just doesn't seem right. But oh well, it is what it is.
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,176
17,878
224
Massachusetts
May 23, 2011
#9
  • May 23, 2011
  • #9
Tires are everything.

When I had my 03gt, I could regularly chirp 4th gear. When I put decent rubber on it, could barely chirp 2nd after that.

So without a timeslip, it's hard to say how fast it should be. I'd guess it should put down a mid to low 14 second et on street tires
 

90lxcoupe

20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 7, 2003
3,596
350
134
May 23, 2011
#10
  • May 23, 2011
  • #10
Its hard to say with the description in the original post. Everyone has a different idea of what "feels fast"

You didnt say what your timing was set at, thats a good spot to start, also, what heads are on the motor? I'd assume by the original post they are stock, if thats the case, your giving up alot right there
 

25thmustang

Mustang Master
Sep 5, 2003
2,021
85
99
Montgomery, NY
May 24, 2011
#11
  • May 24, 2011
  • #11
hoopty5.0 said:
Oh, yeah man, I couldn't agree more.

I was scratching my head about a 11 sec capable car not being able to spin the tires. Just doesn't seem right. But oh well, it is what it is.
Click to expand...

Ah, I see. I was scratching my head too, especially knowing the trashed tires that were on the car.
 

5LiterWes

Member
May 7, 2002
176
15
19
Milwaukee
May 24, 2011
#12
  • May 24, 2011
  • #12
Kdubslugga said:
Only way to tell for sure is head to the track and see what your trap speed is, that will answer all your questions. Spinnin aint winnin anyways. Something to try, have a buddy drive your car with you ridin shotgun. Trust me you get used to your car real quick and it starts to feel slow
Click to expand...


^This.

If its running 94mph in the quarter or something like that, then yah, something is definitely awry.
 

2000xp8

SN Certified Technician
Aug 8, 2003
8,016
1,613
194
NJ
May 24, 2011
#13
  • May 24, 2011
  • #13
Honestly there isn't much done to your car.
Your mod list appears to be extensive, but without the heads, you really don't have much.
Probably about 235rwhp.
The 3.55 gears also will play a role in how the car feels too, while it may not be much sometimes if any slower than a 3.73, it feels different than one.
 

SteedaGT9150

Advanced Member
Nov 10, 2004
1,351
59
68
Maryland
May 25, 2011
#14
  • May 25, 2011
  • #14
Kdubslugga said:
Something to try, have a buddy drive your car with you ridin shotgun. Trust me you get used to your car real quick and it starts to feel slow
Click to expand...

Had my buddy do this the other weekend and damn was it 100x different than actually driving it. When your driving you know exactly when your going to punch it and can brace yourself.
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,176
17,878
224
Massachusetts
May 25, 2011
#15
  • May 25, 2011
  • #15
2000xp8 said:
Honestly there isn't much done to your car.
Your mod list appears to be extensive, but without the heads, you really don't have much.
Probably about 235rwhp.
The 3.55 gears also will play a role in how the car feels too, while it may not be much sometimes if any slower than a 3.73, it feels different than one.
Click to expand...


I agree. it's not going to be that much faster than a stocker
 

SVT32VDOHC

waiting for the next hack atta
Founding Member
Nov 22, 2001
3,501
28
119
Motor City
May 25, 2011
#16
  • May 25, 2011
  • #16
2000xp8 said:
Honestly there isn't much done to your car.
Your mod list appears to be extensive, but without the heads, you really don't have much.
Probably about 235rwhp.
The 3.55 gears also will play a role in how the car feels too, while it may not be much sometimes if any slower than a 3.73, it feels different than one.
Click to expand...

I'd sawy 245RWHP is being generous. I wouldn't expect it to be much over 190rwhp.
 

2000xp8

SN Certified Technician
Aug 8, 2003
8,016
1,613
194
NJ
May 25, 2011
#17
  • May 25, 2011
  • #17
SVT32VDOHC said:
I'd sawy 245RWHP is being generous. I wouldn't expect it to be much over 190rwhp.
Click to expand...

Yea, maybe a bit generous (with 235rwhp), but i have seen cars that get into the 220's without an intake.
 
3

310stanger

New Member
Aug 15, 2006
170
1
0
May 26, 2011
#18
  • May 26, 2011
  • #18
A bunch of people already said it and I agree.....You may think you have a lot of mods, but you have really basic bolt ons, a throttle body thats too big and more intake then those stock heads even really need. Put aluminum heads and a cam in the car and then when it doesnt pull hard you can be pissed lol
 

88blowngt

New Member
Jun 29, 2009
68
0
0
Dover, Delaware
May 29, 2011
#19
  • May 29, 2011
  • #19
I think 235 rwhp is close to what he can put down. I put down 234/281 with my boltons. Shorties, x pipe, slp lm1 catback, msd dizzy, super conductors, coil, k&n filter, timing at 12 degrees, 91 octane, 3.73s.
 

03ghoststang

Well-Known Member
Jul 16, 2005
1,930
1
57
Los Angeles, California
May 29, 2011
#20
  • May 29, 2011
  • #20
I agree with most post....when i first got my 5.0 first thing was basic bolt ons and 3.73's felt a big difference but once i dynoed it put down 195whp because i had a blown head gasket on the driver side once i took the motor apart and saw 2 clean piston tops lol....then i went with what i have on my sig the car it put down 303HP 327TQ without the port work and custom cam, as it sits at the moment i know i gain alot more but i havent had a chance to get it dynoed....
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

S
Engine Stalls when downshifting/coasting
  • Scott_S
  • Nov 5, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
11
Views
648
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Nov 6, 2025
Mustang5L5
B
Questions About T5 Manual
  • Blackout67
  • Apr 13, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
10
Views
543
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Apr 22, 2025
89ripper
S
Upgrade Advice on an 89 GT Convertible NJ
  • SteakDad
  • Apr 17, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
10
Views
823
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 18, 2025
limp
H
New kid on the block
  • HydraX
  • Mar 22, 2025
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
17
Views
677
The Welcome Wagon Mar 22, 2025
HydraX
H
Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
45
Views
2K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 4, 2026
nickyb
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?