• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Should My 87 Motor Have A Mechanical Fuel Pump Block Off Plate?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 86GT5speed
  • Start date Start date Aug 28, 2012

86GT5speed

Member
Sep 26, 2007
144
2
18
lynnwood, WA
Aug 28, 2012
#1
  • Aug 28, 2012
  • #1
im thinking this isnt right. did the motors in 87 come this way or is it cast closed off?
 

CarMichael Angelo

my rearend will smell so minty fresh,
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
10,641
8,909
234
Birmingham, al
Aug 28, 2012
#2
  • Aug 28, 2012
  • #2
It is possible for someone to have put an early model T/C on your motor, and then install a block off plate. If that is the case, they would have also plugged the hole in the front where the dipstick would've went into the pan. The Early model T/C was available for cheap last time I needed one, that may be why you have one.
 

86GT5speed

Member
Sep 26, 2007
144
2
18
lynnwood, WA
Aug 29, 2012
#3
  • Aug 29, 2012
  • #3
madmike1157 said:
It is possible for someone to have put an early model T/C on your motor, and then install a block off plate. If that is the case, they would have also plugged the hole in the front where the dipstick would've went into the pan. The Early model T/C was available for cheap last time I needed one, that may be why you have one.
Click to expand...
i need to check to see what motor i have, as far as the year... kinda got me wondering. it does have a goofy chrome water pump and chrome edlbrock valve covers so it could be a old non roller motor is all i worry about
 

rd

Founding Member
Jan 12, 2000
3,316
63
109
Ocean Springs MS
Aug 29, 2012
#4
  • Aug 29, 2012
  • #4
An 87 should not have the mechanical fuel pump boss machined, that cover is an earlier one.

Early Fox 5.0s had a mechanical fuel pump up to 85, so that timing cover will fit and work with the accessories. It did not have the dipstick hole, it was cast but not drilled. Also a mechanical fuel pump cam has a different length dowel on the front to hold the fuel pump drive.

Beware of a 79 or earlier block that does not have a dipstick hole. The dipstick is in the oilpan. I almost ended up with an earlier block and later pan, and no place for the the dipstick.
 

86GT5speed

Member
Sep 26, 2007
144
2
18
lynnwood, WA
Aug 30, 2012
#5
  • Aug 30, 2012
  • #5
are the threads tapped on 87? maybe they just bolted the chrome plate on for fun
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

S
Fox '87 GT can't get to stay running
  • spilly
  • Mar 29, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
27
Views
843
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
spilly
S
S
FUEL PUMP ALWAYS ON
  • Scwhitten
  • Jun 6, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
27
Views
509
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jul 4, 2026
manicmechanic007
F
2004 Mustang GT – Fuel Pump Not Priming
  • Fayio
  • Apr 22, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
326
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Apr 27, 2026
n0v8or
N
Engine Suggestions on an engine rebuild. Stock cam/GT40Ps or aftermarket on both for a fun weekend driver?
  • MadSquirrelTech
  • Apr 28, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
858
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 7, 2026
MadSquirrelTech
A
1987 5.0 speed density Foxbody crank no start
  • Alan2204
  • May 23, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
10
Views
319
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 30, 2026
Mcmahst
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?