• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Simple intake question.

  • Thread starter Thread starter FrumRoll
  • Start date Start date Mar 26, 2006
F

FrumRoll

New Member
Mar 19, 2006
38
0
0
Mar 26, 2006
#1
  • Mar 26, 2006
  • #1
Hello,
I've got a basically stock '87 GT, 3:73's, MAF Conversion, MAC Fenderwell, Underdrives, A9P Computer, Off-Road H with Dumps, Smog Delete, A/C Delete, Short Belt, AFPR, probably a few other little things. I've also got a tubular GT-40 upper sitting on the shelf, is it worth getting a ported lower for it from Tmoss and installing as is or is it simply too big and I shouldn't bother until I get a heads and cam package?

Thanks in advance.
 

DeadLifter

Member
Mar 1, 2006
183
2
19
Portland, IN
Mar 26, 2006
#2
  • Mar 26, 2006
  • #2
If ya got it might as well use it.
 

gt40_2003wes

I did sound a wee bit gay there.
Aug 14, 2005
461
2
48
ky
Mar 26, 2006
#3
  • Mar 26, 2006
  • #3
yep definately worth it ur intake is the biggest restriction right now then those e7s then the cam.
 
F

FrumRoll

New Member
Mar 19, 2006
38
0
0
Mar 26, 2006
#4
  • Mar 26, 2006
  • #4
Thanks for the responses, I wasn't sure if this was a situation where I'd gain a couple horses at like 5000rpm, but lose a bunch of torque at streetable rpms.
 

Euphoric306

New Member
Apr 5, 2004
905
0
0
Mar 26, 2006
#5
  • Mar 26, 2006
  • #5
gt40- after intake and heads, IMO exhaust and other inductions like maf and TB are a bigger restriction than the cam. the stock camshaft is even a great mild forced induction cam for a turbo or blower setup running around 350-400 wheel horse.
 

tmoss

Gettin Wired
Founding Member
Jun 28, 2001
7,153
32
128
Saint Louis, MO
Mar 26, 2006
#6
  • Mar 26, 2006
  • #6
You have stock heads - no need to port a GT40 intake for stock heads - put it on and run it.......
 
F

FrumRoll

New Member
Mar 19, 2006
38
0
0
Mar 26, 2006
#7
  • Mar 26, 2006
  • #7
tmoss said:
You have stock heads - no need to port a GT40 intake for stock heads - put it on and run it.......
Click to expand...
Agreed, except I don't have the lower and figured I may as well do it right the first time and grow into it.
 

mustangramair

Member
Feb 24, 2004
326
0
17
Iowa
Mar 26, 2006
#8
  • Mar 26, 2006
  • #8
I say put it on if you have it, it's not the difficult. I say port the lower it after you get new H/C/I. If you don't plan on getting a new H/C/I set up in the near future i wouldn't worry about it.
 

tmoss

Gettin Wired
Founding Member
Jun 28, 2001
7,153
32
128
Saint Louis, MO
Mar 26, 2006
#9
  • Mar 26, 2006
  • #9
Get the lower and use it as-is until you get heads that flow >220cfm - then port it.
 

vikingpower

New Member
Dec 6, 2004
656
0
0
CWU Ellensburg, WA
Mar 26, 2006
#10
  • Mar 26, 2006
  • #10
Dont forget to gasket-match the port openings before you install it.
 

tmoss

Gettin Wired
Founding Member
Jun 28, 2001
7,153
32
128
Saint Louis, MO
Mar 26, 2006
#11
  • Mar 26, 2006
  • #11
no need on a stock E7 head - they are very close as-is.
 
F

FrumRoll

New Member
Mar 19, 2006
38
0
0
Mar 26, 2006
#12
  • Mar 26, 2006
  • #12
tmoss said:
Get the lower and use it as-is until you get heads that flow >220cfm - then port it.
Click to expand...
Thanks for the advice, I figure if the guy I'd be sending money to do the porting is telling me not to bother, then I probably should listen.
 

Euphoric306

New Member
Apr 5, 2004
905
0
0
Mar 27, 2006
#13
  • Mar 27, 2006
  • #13
umm... is it a stock lower intake? if so, and if you plan on changing heads soon, then i'd port it, but like said, if you have no real plans of doing a head swap then leave it as is, but you're not gonna get much from a gt40 upper with a stock lower
 
F

FrumRoll

New Member
Mar 19, 2006
38
0
0
Mar 27, 2006
#14
  • Mar 27, 2006
  • #14
I don't have any lower right now, well I have the stock lower that's on the car. My plan was to purchase a GT40 lower and have TMoss port it, that plan has since changed to purchasing a GT40 lower and installing it as is and getting some porting done after heads and cam somewhere down the road.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

S
Fuel ‘88 GT Runs Rich Cold — Fixes Itself When I Unplug Sensors (ECT, MAF, O2, etc.)
  • Sufarry
  • Nov 6, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
12
Views
906
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Nov 9, 2025
Mustang5L5
For Sale 3-owner 1987 Mustang GT, $18K obro, Lancaster CA
  • Bill Cool
  • Oct 6, 2024
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
4
Views
2K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Oct 13, 2024
nickyb
New combo
  • 87slow.0
  • Oct 19, 2022
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 19, 2022
87slow.0
T
What's it Worth? 1989 GT - What's it worth?
  • Tim83
  • May 11, 2021
  • What is it Worth?!?!?
Replies
2
Views
3K
What is it Worth?!?!? Jun 3, 2021
Mustang5L5
Engine Need help with fox body code results.
  • sav22rem22
  • Feb 17, 2020
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
0
Views
836
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Feb 17, 2020
sav22rem22
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?