• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

sn95 Shocks and Struts on a lowered Foxbody??

  • Thread starter Thread starter xporter
  • Start date Start date Aug 7, 2009

xporter

Member
Apr 9, 2002
34
2
6
Florida
Aug 7, 2009
#1
  • Aug 7, 2009
  • #1
Anyone here using sn95 strut on a lowered fox? I did a search and could not find a straight answer. So if you have some personal experience please post up, thanks.
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,258
17,941
224
Massachusetts
Aug 7, 2009
#2
  • Aug 7, 2009
  • #2
The strut bodies are a little longer. As a result, you lose a little travel of the strut piston and run into the chance of it bottoming out.

Out back, i beleive you could use SN95 stuff
 

HISSIN50

"How long does it take to get help in here?
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
31,179
34
129
Aug 7, 2009
#3
  • Aug 7, 2009
  • #3
I would not do it.

It's usually the other way around. Lowered SN95's use fox III dampers.
 

Shakerhood

20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 28, 2004
3,356
208
114
Ohio
Aug 8, 2009
#4
  • Aug 8, 2009
  • #4
I would want to know how much it is lowered and any other Mods. I have 2001 Bullitt Struts, Shocks, and Springs on my car, but I have 1995 Spindles which have a lower mounting point and CC Plates which raise the top mounting point. My Car sits about 7/8" Lower up front and about 3/4" Lower out back than it did with the Stock stuff.
 

KENS89LX

Member
Mar 12, 2006
302
1
19
Cross lanes Wv
Aug 8, 2009
#5
  • Aug 8, 2009
  • #5
I used the struts off the 95 v-6 on my 89 5 lug conversion and have had no problems
 

xporter

Member
Apr 9, 2002
34
2
6
Florida
Aug 8, 2009
#6
  • Aug 8, 2009
  • #6
my89blubyu said:
I used the struts off the 95 v-6 on my 89 5 lug conversion and have had no problems
Click to expand...

Is your car lowered, if so how much?
 

93 LX

Founding Member
Jun 2, 2000
3,081
3
0
Norwalk, CA.
Aug 9, 2009
#7
  • Aug 9, 2009
  • #7
Maximum Motorsports - Why install SN95 shocks on a Fox chassis?

look at this..
 

xporter

Member
Apr 9, 2002
34
2
6
Florida
Aug 10, 2009
#8
  • Aug 10, 2009
  • #8
93 LX said:
Maximum Motorsports - Why install SN95 shocks on a Fox chassis?

look at this..
Click to expand...

I've seen that but that only applies to Bilsteins. The have one part number for the front struts. Every other company has two part numbers.

I guess I'm going to try and see what happens. I've got 5 way tockicos and steeda sports sitting in the garage. They came off of a 2000. I know the springs work and the rear shocks will work. So I'm going to put the front struts on and see. I'll report back after the install.

I was looking for someone with real world experience that has done it.
 

KENS89LX

Member
Mar 12, 2006
302
1
19
Cross lanes Wv
Aug 10, 2009
#9
  • Aug 10, 2009
  • #9
Yes I hve the Ford motorsports B springs which are 1 inch lower
 

Kumm3

Founding Member
Jul 30, 2002
527
33
69
East Hartford, CT
Aug 10, 2009
#10
  • Aug 10, 2009
  • #10
I am running coilovers on 03 Cobra Struts and on SN95 rear shocks. I also have 95 spindles. Car is lowered a good 2" from stock, maybe more, and never had an issue with the struts bottoming out.

On stock fox spindles, i cant vouch for them. But just wanted to give you a scenario that i have first hand knowledge of them working.
 

xporter

Member
Apr 9, 2002
34
2
6
Florida
Aug 11, 2009
#11
  • Aug 11, 2009
  • #11
Thanks. I seems like the more people I talk too that have used them with a sn95 setup on a lowered fox haven't had any issues. I've still yet to have someone say "yes I've used them on a lowered fox and bottomed out".
 

JKidd

Member
Aug 21, 2007
164
3
19
Suffield, CT
Aug 12, 2009
#12
  • Aug 12, 2009
  • #12
xporter said:
I've seen that but that only applies to Bilsteins. The have one part number for the front struts. Every other company has two part numbers.

I guess I'm going to try and see what happens. I've got 5 way tockicos and steeda sports sitting in the garage. They came off of a 2000. I know the springs work and the rear shocks will work. So I'm going to put the front struts on and see. I'll report back after the install.

I was looking for someone with real world experience that has done it.
Click to expand...

I actually emailed MM asking that question (if that was only applicable to Bilsteins) and the tech responded that is was NOT.

Response: "The article "Shock Recommendations: SN95 shocks on a Fox chassis" does apply to all brands, not just Bilstein. The shocks for the 1994-2004 Mustang will not hurt ride quality. In fact, these shocks will improve ride quality because they feature a shorter and softer bumpstop. Enjoy! "
 

xporter

Member
Apr 9, 2002
34
2
6
Florida
Aug 13, 2009
#13
  • Aug 13, 2009
  • #13
JKidd said:
I actually emailed MM asking that question (if that was only applicable to Bilsteins) and the tech responded that is was NOT.

Response: "The article "Shock Recommendations: SN95 shocks on a Fox chassis" does apply to all brands, not just Bilstein. The shocks for the 1994-2004 Mustang will not hurt ride quality. In fact, these shocks will improve ride quality because they feature a shorter and softer bumpstop. Enjoy! "
Click to expand...

I had called MM and they told me for the rears it does not matter because the only difference is the sn95 use internal bump stops so all you have to do it remove the fox bumpstop that's mounted to the frame. He said the for the fronts Bilstein uses one part number but that other companies have two seperate part numbers and reccomend I use the fox part number.

I had actually done as much research before posting here. That's why I wanted to hear from someone that had actually done it to see what the outcome was. The reasons I've been told not to use them is because of bottoming out, but like I said I haven't heard anyone say "yeah I used them and bottomed out".
 

xporter

Member
Apr 9, 2002
34
2
6
Florida
Aug 25, 2009
#14
  • Aug 25, 2009
  • #14
So I installed Steeda Sport Springs 79-04 and 5 way Tokicos with sn95 part numbers. I got a really good deal on these parts so I figured I'd give it a try. Took 2.5 hrs to install in my garage. I've driven the car on the street, highway, over railroad tracks, etc. and have yet to experience any bottoming out. My car isn't exteremly low so that may attribute to them not bottoming. I'm also running sn95 spindles.

View attachment 247722
 

67coupe

Founding Member
Apr 5, 2002
658
402
93
Huntsville, AL
Aug 25, 2009
#15
  • Aug 25, 2009
  • #15
Can't speak for front struts, but I'm using MM supplied SN95 Bilstein's out back with Eibach Pro's. No problems so far.
 

93 LX

Founding Member
Jun 2, 2000
3,081
3
0
Norwalk, CA.
Aug 25, 2009
#16
  • Aug 25, 2009
  • #16
it looks good.. me thinks I will try it! LOL
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Suspension Harsh Ride
  • PonyGTrider
  • Mar 20, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3 4
Replies
62
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Apr 11, 2026
Noobz347
Engine Explorer - Lower intake internal cleaning
  • R82148V
  • Nov 11, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
42
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Dec 6, 2025
rednotch
Hood strut kit
  • 78 Mach1
  • Apr 16, 2025
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Replies
19
Views
995
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech May 1, 2025
LILCBRA
Strut Tower Help!
  • 93Nifty
  • Jan 10, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
28
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 28, 2026
General karthief
F
Difference between 83-86 EFI and 87-97 gas tanks?
  • ForeverDrivin
  • Mar 30, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
270
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 30, 2026
ForeverDrivin
F
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?