• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

Snakeoil??? <---Ported stock Throttle Body......

  • Thread starter Thread starter lockw33d
  • Start date Start date Sep 2, 2005

lockw33d

New Member
May 10, 2005
64
0
0
Sep 2, 2005
#1
  • Sep 2, 2005
  • #1
i just dont see how this will help any since the blade is the smallest pat of the TB and its the stock 65mm, it doesnt matter what size the opened the entrance up to... am i correct in my thinking

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/Port...996358574QQcategoryZ33558QQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem
 

Dan_Soprano

15 Year Member
May 7, 2003
7,410
54
129
Jacksonville, FL
Sep 2, 2005
#2
  • Sep 2, 2005
  • #2
I don't get the title to this thread.... , Anyways, I don't see any power gains from this. I CAN see some added turbulence from the lip around the trottle blade though. Waste of $$ IMO.
 

lockw33d

New Member
May 10, 2005
64
0
0
Sep 2, 2005
#3
  • Sep 2, 2005
  • #3
Dan_Soprano said:
I don't get the title to this thread....
Click to expand...


Back in olden days traveling sales men used to sell snakeoil saying it cures everything, so now its an expression for used for anythign that says its going to do miracles but doesnt
 

Dan_Soprano

15 Year Member
May 7, 2003
7,410
54
129
Jacksonville, FL
Sep 2, 2005
#4
  • Sep 2, 2005
  • #4
lockw33d said:
Back in olden days traveling sales men used to sell snakeoil saying it cures everything, so now its an expression for used for anythign that says its going to do miracles but doesnt
Click to expand...
ahhhhh ok. Gotcha.
 

twogts4us

15 Year Member
Apr 1, 2004
4,188
12
79
Dunedin, FL
Sep 2, 2005
#5
  • Sep 2, 2005
  • #5
That TB is a joke...so what has he done to it? Trimmed the butterfly shaft? Hahaha!
EBay seller - (I. M. Rippenoff) said:
Don’t waste your money on a 70mm or 75mm throttle body, this is all you need...The flow area of this TB is about 69mm
Click to expand...
Should have known...69 is perfect. But 70 or 75 is a waste of money? Please dude, don't get us started on what is or isn't a waste of money.
EBay seller - (I. M. Rippenoff) said:
You can calculate this figure yourself if you are unsure about it.
Click to expand...
Yeah, I'd just like to know how he came up with this calculation. In fact, I just asked him on Ebay...wonder if he'll reply...?
 

wms004

Founding Member
Jan 15, 2002
2,864
2
49
Los Angeles
Sep 2, 2005
#6
  • Sep 2, 2005
  • #6
lockw33d said:
i just dont see how this will help any since the blade is the smallest pat of the TB and its the stock 65mm, it doesnt matter what size the opened the entrance up to... am i correct in my thinking

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/Port...996358574QQcategoryZ33558QQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem
Click to expand...
Throttle body and plenum combo is the way to go.. Not great for power/dollar, but at least it will be somewhat noticable.
 
M

mitchellwerkes

New Member
Sep 3, 2005
1
0
0
Sep 3, 2005
#7
  • Sep 3, 2005
  • #7
Snake oil... kinda

Looks like some guy just ground down the blade shaft. It would give more area, but it isn't very pretty, and definitely not precise enough to calculate the boost...
 

twogts4us

15 Year Member
Apr 1, 2004
4,188
12
79
Dunedin, FL
Sep 4, 2005
#8
  • Sep 4, 2005
  • #8
twogts4us said:
Yeah, I'd just like to know how he came up with this calculation. In fact, I just asked him on Ebay...wonder if he'll reply...?
Click to expand...
Well, he did reply - ladies and gents, I present to you C.P. Engineering (I think he left the "R" and the "A" out of the name of his <cough>Company<cough>.
EBay seller - (I. M. Rippenoff) Official Known As C.P. Engineering said:
There is more to throttle body flow then just diameter. Read the next sentence, you can prove it yourself. (Flow area = area of throttle body - area blocked by shaft & blade) So to increase flow area you either have to increase the area of the throttle body (larger diameter) or decrease the amount of area blocked by the shaft and blade (port it).
Click to expand...

Ummm, sorry dude...my question was "How did you come up with this statement? The flow area of this TB is about the same as a throttle body with a 69mm diameter and a stock shaft." Telling me to prove it myself doesn't make me want to purchase your product, not that I would anyway...
Sooo, I've asked him for additional info -
"I don't want to prove it myself. I want to understand how you came to the conclusion that this TB flows the same as a 69mm TB. Was this ported TB bench flow tested?
Also, it seems to me that hacking away at the buttefly shaft could cause considerable turbulance. How did your engineering avoid this?"

I'll let you all know what I hear...
 

jstreet0204

Active Member
Jun 26, 2003
939
0
36
Winston Salem, NC
Sep 4, 2005
#9
  • Sep 4, 2005
  • #9
The area of a circle is (pi(3.14) * radius * radius)
Then you have to subtract the area of the blade shaft, assuming stock is about 10mm (just guessing here).

So on a 69mm tb with a 10mm shaft, the area would be
(3.14 * 34.5 * 34.5) - (10*69) = 3047.3 square mm's

a 65mm tb with a shaft shaved down to 5mm would be
(3.14 * 32.5 * 32.5) - (5*65) = 2991.6 square mm's


a 65mm tb with a 10mm shaft would be
(3.14 * 32.5 * 32.5) - (5*65) = 2988.375 square mm's

This is assuming that you could shave the shaft down 50% the entire length of the shaft, but judging by the pic, he has not.
So, you can see if he had actually shown the, math his claims would not add up.
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Sep 5, 2005
#10
  • Sep 5, 2005
  • #10
Who cares.....65mm T/B.....69mm T/B. Makes all of 1hp difference on a stock car and maybe double that on a modified car. If he’s such an expert on airflow, why didn’t he venturi and polish the inlet of the T/B to a mirror finish to increase flow velocity while he was at it?

If I were a person looking at buying a replacement stock throttle body, I might have considered this one before reading the add, but after reading this guys ridiculous "inflated" claims of flow and performance along with his inflated price after 5-minutes worth of work with a die grinder and a sanding cartridge.....it's becomes pretty obvious to me that he's talking out of his @$$ and dealings with him should be avoided based on that alone.

This guy is probably one of those back lot used car salesman by day.
 

twogts4us

15 Year Member
Apr 1, 2004
4,188
12
79
Dunedin, FL
Sep 5, 2005
#11
  • Sep 5, 2005
  • #11
jstreet0204 said:
The area of a circle is (pi(3.14) * radius * radius)
Then you have to subtract the area of the blade shaft, assuming stock is about 10mm (just guessing here).

So on a 69mm tb with a 10mm shaft, the area would be
(3.14 * 34.5 * 34.5) - (10*69) = 3047.3 square mm's

a 65mm tb with a shaft shaved down to 5mm would be
(3.14 * 32.5 * 32.5) - (5*65) = 2991.6 square mm's


a 65mm tb with a 10mm shaft would be
(3.14 * 32.5 * 32.5) - (5*65) = 2988.375 square mm's

This is assuming that you could shave the shaft down 50% the entire length of the shaft, but judging by the pic, he has not.
So, you can see if he had actually shown the, math his claims would not add up.
Click to expand...
Thanks for the math lesson, bro (seriously!!!)
 

hotmustang331

Active Member
Apr 29, 2004
2,967
3
48
Bastrop,TX
Sep 5, 2005
#12
  • Sep 5, 2005
  • #12
LOL, the turbulance it creats would just take away the flow increase of the diameter and probably cause it to flow less than a STOCK TB. I would buy a stock one before that...even if that was free. It will hurt power. It can still only flow 65MM past the blade(+ the TAD more thats gained my maiking the blade thinner), so even if it was smoothed to where the transition to 69MM-65 was a nice gradual thing....it wouldnt help more than a 1/4 of a HP. and that would be purely from working the blade. I feel sorry for the guy who buys that.
 

Dark Knight GT

I can't get it up......ok that didn't sound right.
May 26, 2003
3,653
2
56
Ozark, Missouri
Sep 5, 2005
#13
  • Sep 5, 2005
  • #13
I some how feel I'm to blame for crap like this. I think back last year when I did that port and polish write up, people got the wrong idea when it comes to the throttle body. I don't "port" throttle bodies, I only polish the entry to a smooth mirror surface for some what better flow. I will also usually polish the backside and throttle blade if they need it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

SURGING IDLE / NO IDLE CHECKLIST FOR 1999–2004 MUSTANG GT (4.6L 2V) - Work In Progress
  • Noobz347
  • Aug 30, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
887
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Aug 30, 2025
Noobz347
G
Fuel Stock 1994 5.0 throttle body size
  • GOvert
  • Mar 15, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
10
Views
4K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 1, 2025
95gt1985
9
SURGING IDLE / NO IDLE CHECKLIST FOR 1996–1998 MUSTANG GT (4.6L 2V) - Work In Progress
  • Noobz347
  • Aug 30, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
727
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Aug 30, 2025
Noobz347
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
851
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
Advice on Throttle body not sealing to Intake manifold -- 2001 GT
  • SN95_fanx54
  • May 1, 2022
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
1
Views
2K
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech May 2, 2022
SN95_fanx54
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?