• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

So Confused On Trick Flow Heads?

  • Thread starter Thread starter fiveohlover
  • Start date Start date May 24, 2012
Prev
  • 1
  • …
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
Next
First Prev 7 of 8 Next Last

NIKwoaC

中國製造
15 Year Member
Oct 31, 2006
5,525
943
214
Chengdu Province
May 31, 2012
#121
  • May 31, 2012
  • #121
Heyyy, bout time you guys showed up.
 

fiveohlover

Member
Oct 13, 2011
187
5
19
mn
May 31, 2012
#122
  • May 31, 2012
  • #122
Gregg@TFS said:
I am sorry I read through most of the thread and have read your questions but I must have missed this. Are you you currently working with a stock short block or are you starting from scratch?
Click to expand...
yup stock pistons and everything. so greg with the stock pistons could i run the 185 with the 58cc chambers or will i run into piston to valve clearance issues with a decent sized cam?
 

Bullitt347

I have been doing it wrong this whole time
15 Year Member
Mar 23, 2007
3,964
2,923
194
Middle of Maine
May 31, 2012
#123
  • May 31, 2012
  • #123
It is all about duration when it comes to piston to valve clearance. Lift is NOT the issue. You could run .700 lift with a 185 head with stock pistons if the duration at .050 is 220* or less. (assuming a 114*LSA) The cylinder head combustion chamber volume has ZERO effect on PTV clearance, only on compression.
 

NIKwoaC

中國製造
15 Year Member
Oct 31, 2006
5,525
943
214
Chengdu Province
May 31, 2012
#124
  • May 31, 2012
  • #124
Bullitt347 said:
It is all about duration when it comes to piston to valve clearance. Lift is NOT the issue. You could run .700 lift with a 185 head with stock pistons if the duration at .050 is 220* or less. (assuming a 114*LSA) The cylinder head combustion chamber volume has ZERO effect on PTV clearance, only on compression.
Click to expand...

I agree with the first part but not the second. You mill a head to reduce chamber volume, which effectively brings the valves closer to the piston, at least to some extent.
 

Bullitt347

I have been doing it wrong this whole time
15 Year Member
Mar 23, 2007
3,964
2,923
194
Middle of Maine
May 31, 2012
#125
  • May 31, 2012
  • #125
Your right, but I was referring to what the head cc volume was out of the box as the OP has not bought the heads yet. I should have been more specific.
 

fiveohlover

Member
Oct 13, 2011
187
5
19
mn
May 31, 2012
#126
  • May 31, 2012
  • #126
i dont get it about porting. porting you are removing metal and are making things smoother right? so wouldn't porting increase the combustion chamber size?
 

NIKwoaC

中國製造
15 Year Member
Oct 31, 2006
5,525
943
214
Chengdu Province
May 31, 2012
#127
  • May 31, 2012
  • #127
fiveohlover said:
i dont get it about porting. porting you are removing metal and are making things smoother right? so wouldn't porting increase the combustion chamber size?
Click to expand...

You have much yet to learn, young grasshopper. PORTing is modifying the port. The port and combustion chamber are not one and the same. They are separated by the valve.
 

fiveohlover

Member
Oct 13, 2011
187
5
19
mn
May 31, 2012
#128
  • May 31, 2012
  • #128
yes i am a noobie, dont worry i am going to get some help installing my h/c/i on my car.
 

fiveohlover

Member
Oct 13, 2011
187
5
19
mn
May 31, 2012
#129
  • May 31, 2012
  • #129
Gregg@TFS said:
You are correct, there are a couple different families of heads. You have the F.A.C. head now that have cnc'd chambers available in the 170cc or the 190cc runners. The 170cc head as 2 chambers available 58cc which will require pistons or the good old 61cc that will work on any stock short block up to .540" lift and of course that depends on the duration of the cam. The 190cc head only comes in the 64cc chamber and the dual spring (.600" lift spring). The F.A.C. heads are also available in the Street or the Track Heat versions. The Street heads still have the emissions ports, 3/8" rockers studs and they come with the single spring good up to .540" lift. The Track Heat heads DO NOT have the emissions ports, they have 7/16 rocker studs and they come with the dual spring good up to .600" lift.

The CNC'd family of heads you have the 185 and 205cc heads. They CNC'd heads come in different versions as well. To start off the list you have the Street ported 185cc that is available in the 58cc (once again requires pistons) or the 64cc chamber. Both heads come with the dual springs.

Then last but not least you get into the Race CNC'd heads which come in the 185 and 205cc runner sizes. The 185cc head only comes in the 64cc chamber and the 205cc head only comes with a 65cc chamber.

All of the cnc'd heads we offer come with the 7/16 studs and the dual springs.


I hope this clears up the offerings that are available in the Twisted Wedge line up.
Click to expand...

so there is no way i can get the 185 with the 58cc chambers? i want to get the most compression from my stock bottom end
 

ViperPunk

Member
Jul 30, 2010
195
1
18
idaho
May 31, 2012
#130
  • May 31, 2012
  • #130
Don't know for sure but couldn't you just mill them down to 58cc? but I think that hurts the overall airflow a little though...(not totally sure my internet wisdom is not the greatest).
 

NIKwoaC

中國製造
15 Year Member
Oct 31, 2006
5,525
943
214
Chengdu Province
Jun 1, 2012
#131
  • Jun 1, 2012
  • #131
fiveohlover said:
so there is no way i can get the 185 with the 58cc chambers? i want to get the most compression from my stock bottom end
Click to expand...

That's why you get them from a one-stop-shop that can set you up with exactly what you need. TEA milled my 205s from 65 to 61 cc. Other places can do this too. Or, you can buy them and have a local machine shop mill them for you, but you'll probably end up having more money in that.

ViperPunk said:
Don't know for sure but couldn't you just mill them down to 58cc? but I think that hurts the overall airflow a little though...(not totally sure my internet wisdom is not the greatest).
Click to expand...

Depends on the head, the valve job, and how much you have to cut off the head to get the CC that you want. Milling my 205s did not have any negative affect on advertised flow numbers. Mine actually flowed a few CFM higher than advertised, at least on TEA's flow bench. I bet Rick or Gregg could offer more info on that.
 

fiveohlover

Member
Oct 13, 2011
187
5
19
mn
Jun 1, 2012
#132
  • Jun 1, 2012
  • #132
well if it hurts performance should i get the 64cc. whats more inportant airflow or compression?
 

Rick 91GT

Mustang Master
Nov 29, 1999
9,692
95
99
PA
Jun 1, 2012
#133
  • Jun 1, 2012
  • #133
I prefer to have a small chamber and then as much dish as I need to give me proper compression, but it also depends on the chamber shape and design (closed or open, heart, etc) I aslo prefer a Reverse Dome piston over a dish piston, modulars fords is the only area this changes..lol

A flat top and small cc chamber cylinder head will yield the BEST results, IMO. You maintain proper quench and the the flame travels in the complete area across the piston so you maintain complete combustion.
 

NIKwoaC

中國製造
15 Year Member
Oct 31, 2006
5,525
943
214
Chengdu Province
Jun 1, 2012
#134
  • Jun 1, 2012
  • #134
Rick 91GT said:
I prefer to have a small chamber and then as much dish as I need to give me proper compression, but it also depends on the chamber shape and design (closed or open, heart, etc)
Click to expand...

I have heard this before and I find the logic behind it pretty interesting. I'd love to see a dyno test of identical motors, one with a dish piston and small chamber and the other with a large chamber and a flat top or even domed pistons, both resulting in the same CR.
 

Rick 91GT

Mustang Master
Nov 29, 1999
9,692
95
99
PA
Jun 1, 2012
#135
  • Jun 1, 2012
  • #135
Check out the flow numbers on the 58cc vs the 72cc AFR225 ....different chamber shapes
 

fiveohlover

Member
Oct 13, 2011
187
5
19
mn
Jun 1, 2012
#136
  • Jun 1, 2012
  • #136
ok i think the tfs 185 with the 58cc chambers is probably the best head for me. getting a ed curtis custom street sweeper cam and probably either tfs track heat or holley systemax 2.
 

fiveohlover

Member
Oct 13, 2011
187
5
19
mn
Jun 2, 2012
#137
  • Jun 2, 2012
  • #137
should work ok, right? any body with past experience with the 58cc heads
 

Gregg@TFS

Premium Sponsor
Feb 11, 2008
53
2
8
Jun 12, 2012
#138
  • Jun 12, 2012
  • #138
fiveohlover said:
yup stock pistons and everything. so greg with the stock pistons could i run the 185 with the 58cc chambers or will i run into piston to valve clearance issues with a decent sized cam?
Click to expand...
With the 58cc head on a stock piston using a decent sized cam, yes you will have PTV issues. Your best bet is to stock with at least a 61cc chamber. If you would like to keep the compression up a bit talk to Fox Lake or total Engine Airflow and have the 185cc heads milled to the 61cc chamber.
 
Reactions: Rick 91GT

from6to8

There's suction so I used that end O_O
15 Year Member
Sep 2, 2012
1,896
142
94
Jul 1, 2023
#139
  • Jul 1, 2023
  • #139
Gearbanger 101 said:
You won't come anywhere close to 330-350rwhp with GT40 heads, intake and cam.

Might crack 300rwhp if you're lucky....real lucky.
Click to expand...
i know old thread but searching for some stuff today.

What about maybe not 330-350 rwhp but what about same setup and gt 40 or gt 40p heads vs TF 170s and the gt 40 heads having much more torque? I'll say this 75 mm maf, 70 tb, 24 lb injectors. Only difference is the afore mentioned heads between the same setup?
 

from6to8

There's suction so I used that end O_O
15 Year Member
Sep 2, 2012
1,896
142
94
Jul 1, 2023
#140
  • Jul 1, 2023
  • #140
lxman said:
Yes you can get 330 rwhp with the gt 40 set up. If you cant then you are a f'n moron and can't tune and build your crap right. A good 306 with that will make easy. But whatever, I just build crap like this all the time for people and dyno tune them. So I have no idea huh. A little porting and time and yes you can. What the hell do you think Ford's X302 crate motor is?

But if you wdont want to do that the Trick Flow 170's and Trick flow track heat intake and the cam you talked about will do that for you just fine. There is a lot that goes into building a motor that people on here dont realize. yeah you can throw parts together and spend stupid amounts of money that you really dont need. Or you can take your time do your research and and the math to figure out your compression ratios and everything and have a good motor. Build what is going to make you happy and dont let other people tell you otherwise.

You can PM me if you want more info bro. I will gladly tell you a few H/C/I setups that will work for you and you can choose what you like.

If you want the best set up, In my opinion if you have a stock bottom end is AFR 185's and a Trick Flow stage 1 cam with the Trick Flow track heat intake, 24 lb injectors and mass air with a good tune.
Click to expand...
dang looks like you were last seen 2015 I'd certainly like to pick your brain because I certain did back in 05 what you are saying here not to do and I'd love some advice for in the future with my current setup.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • …
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
Next
First Prev 7 of 8 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

SBF Head Flow Table - Work in Progress
  • Noobz347
  • Sep 29, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
17
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 30, 2025
Noobz347
Engine Suggestions on an engine rebuild. Stock cam/GT40Ps or aftermarket on both for a fun weekend driver?
  • MadSquirrelTech
  • Apr 28, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
797
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 7, 2026
MadSquirrelTech
H
Ongoing Battle With Hydraulic Lifters
  • hailer06
  • Jun 8, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
266
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 9, 2026
Noobz347
  • Locked
Engine Might have to get a Dart block but don't want to and if I do, then 363 instead of 331. Thoughts on what I've already bought so far.......
  • from6to8
  • Jul 8, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
497
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 8, 2025
Noobz347
M
Engine Unexplainable Exhaust Pop and Gurgle
  • Mrnissen122
  • Feb 14, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
12
Views
560
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Feb 18, 2026
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?