• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

solid trans mount potentially bad?

  • Thread starter Thread starter chevyboy_z28
  • Start date Start date Apr 21, 2005

chevyboy_z28

New Member
Jan 1, 2004
66
0
0
Wixom, MI
Apr 21, 2005
#1
  • Apr 21, 2005
  • #1
ok heres the deal, after swapping trannys i had to have a mount fabricated b/c the mounting location on the trans didnt line up with the crossmember. the custom piece came out great (solid steel) and has been doing fine the past couple days ive driven the car, but my brother in law (ASE certified in everything under the sun) seems to think that the mount will be harmful to the trans, and possibly the driveshaft/u-joints. he says that theres nothing there to absorb the torsional vibration from the engine like the stock rubber one did, and thinks a cracked bellhousing or hundereds of u-joints and twisted driveshafts are in my future if i keep this solid mount. i told him that i respected his knowledge, but if this were true then they wouldnt make poly trans mounts, b/c theyre basically the same thing (solid mount with polyurethane covering). he says if anything i should get soild motor mounts to cut down on the torsion/motor torquing side to side and maybe ill be ok. i agree that they would help, but i just replaced the motor mounts last year when i put the headers on ($120...i wanna get my moneys worth!). what do you guys think, i had a solid/poly mount on my lt1 camaro and didnt have any problems however it was an automatic if that makes any difference?
 

mustang70

Founding Member
Nov 15, 2001
2,445
2
48
San Diego
Apr 21, 2005
#2
  • Apr 21, 2005
  • #2
Your brother in law is right. With a solid tranny mount and rubber motor mounts you can break the tailshaft housing or the bellhousing. The poly mount does have some cushioning built in for movement.
 

chevyboy_z28

New Member
Jan 1, 2004
66
0
0
Wixom, MI
Apr 21, 2005
#3
  • Apr 21, 2005
  • #3
would i be ok if i switched to poly motor mounts, or should i just go back, and have them integrate a poly mount into the piece they made?
 

chevyboy_z28

New Member
Jan 1, 2004
66
0
0
Wixom, MI
Apr 21, 2005
#4
  • Apr 21, 2005
  • #4
by the way does energy suspension carry poly motor mounts for us yet, because i had a bad experience with prothane.
 

chevyboy_z28

New Member
Jan 1, 2004
66
0
0
Wixom, MI
Apr 22, 2005
#5
  • Apr 22, 2005
  • #5
ttt
 

chevyboy_z28

New Member
Jan 1, 2004
66
0
0
Wixom, MI
Apr 22, 2005
#6
  • Apr 22, 2005
  • #6
anybody
 

chevyboy_z28

New Member
Jan 1, 2004
66
0
0
Wixom, MI
Apr 27, 2005
#7
  • Apr 27, 2005
  • #7
ttt
 

rkutzner

Founding Member
Jun 20, 2002
57
0
6
Westminster, MD
Jul 9, 2005
#8
  • Jul 9, 2005
  • #8
chevyboy_z28 said:
by the way does energy suspension carry poly motor mounts for us yet, because i had a bad experience with prothane.
Click to expand...

What was your bad experience with Prothane?
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,158
17,850
224
Massachusetts
Jul 9, 2005
#9
  • Jul 9, 2005
  • #9
chevyboy_z28 said:
my brother in law (ASE certified in everything under the sun) seems to think that the mount will be harmful to the trans, and possibly the driveshaft/u-joints. he says that theres nothing there to absorb the torsional vibration from the engine like the stock rubber one did, and thinks a cracked bellhousing or hundereds of u-joints and twisted driveshafts are in my future if i keep this solid mount.
Click to expand...

He is 100% right.


The thing is poly mounts is you are supposed to replace all three together. That way vibration is limited, but not eliminated all together. Some guys do all three mounts solid, but i wouldn' recommend that on a street car.

But a soild trans mount with factory engine mounts puts a lot of stress on the bellhousing and tailhousing.

PS. I am a Mech. Engineer if that helps give what i say any weight.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

1
Engine Motor swap from a 2003 Explorer
  • 1996mustang new
  • Oct 9, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
506
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Oct 16, 2025
squeak93
S
Drivetrain 8.8 Pinion and 302 rear main seal leaks after replacing. 93 5.0 with t-5
  • Steigy4827
  • Jun 23, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
10
Views
606
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Apr 1, 2026
Steigy4827
S
Y
2004 Mustang GT AUTO (4R70W) Grinding noise when going in R or Drive does it as I put it into park too
  • yellowandblack
  • Dec 12, 2024
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
296
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Dec 21, 2024
89ripper
0
V6 to V8 Swap info
  • 02_2v_Curtis
  • Jan 11, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
559
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jan 11, 2026
02_2v_Curtis
0
For Sale Borg Warner WC T5, Stock Bell Housing, RAM Clutch Set, Double Hump Cross Member, & Pro 5.0 Shifter
  • AeroCoupe
  • Aug 9, 2025
  • Drivetrain Parts
Replies
1
Views
524
Drivetrain Parts Dec 26, 2025
AeroCoupe
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?