• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

spark advance

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bullitt0616
  • Start date Start date Sep 11, 2005
B

Bullitt0616

New Member
Aug 31, 2005
96
0
0
Sep 11, 2005
#1
  • Sep 11, 2005
  • #1
As per a fellow member, I tried what he did: Diablo tune with spark set to full advance. only he uses 87 octane and for safety im using 91. i couldnt hear any detonation, but the car sure did feel ALOT faster.

on my diablo diagostic, im running 15/16 spark adv. @idle and 22/23 during a run.

whats the optimum/good degree for my car - shes all stock? is what i did ok/safe?
 

Dark Knight GT

I can't get it up......ok that didn't sound right.
May 26, 2003
3,653
2
56
Ozark, Missouri
Sep 12, 2005
#2
  • Sep 12, 2005
  • #2
If you're not having any pinging, then you probably don't have to worry about damaging anything. I do believe stock ignition timing is 10 degrees. The most you probably want to advance the timing in any rpm incriment level is to 16 degrees. I think after this you start to lose power. Not 100 percent sure on that though.
 

[Twitch]

Member
Mar 30, 2005
168
0
16
Montreal
Sep 12, 2005
#3
  • Sep 12, 2005
  • #3
If you don't hear pinging, it doesn't necessaraly mean there is no detonation. Detonation can occur silently.

Also, I've used 91 octane with Predator tune with max advance spark. I couldn't hear anything, no pinging nothing.

Then I went to the track, at around 5000rpm, you start hearing pinging, but you're not sure because it could be rattles or your car's exhasut is too loud so I couldn't really be sure. But after many tries, I switched over to 94 octane, and the pinging is no longer there.
 
K

Kilgore Trout

Fried or Broiled ?
10 Year Member
Mar 30, 2005
4,749
95
134
Sep 12, 2005
#4
  • Sep 12, 2005
  • #4
Also, remember that ambient temperature can increase the chance of detonation. If it is above 85F or so, you could see pinging that does not usually occur.

And also remember that pinging is a very bad thing especially for aluminum engines.
 

Dark Knight GT

I can't get it up......ok that didn't sound right.
May 26, 2003
3,653
2
56
Ozark, Missouri
Sep 12, 2005
#5
  • Sep 12, 2005
  • #5
[Twitch] said:
If you don't hear pinging, it doesn't necessaraly mean there is no detonation. Detonation can occur silently.

Also, I've used 91 octane with Predator tune with max advance spark. I couldn't hear anything, no pinging nothing.

Then I went to the track, at around 5000rpm, you start hearing pinging, but you're not sure because it could be rattles or your car's exhasut is too loud so I couldn't really be sure. But after many tries, I switched over to 94 octane, and the pinging is no longer there.
Click to expand...
I will agree that detonation can occur, and not be heard. However, the ECU would more than likely pick up on it eventually, and trigger the SES light. I've been running advanced ignition timing on 87 octane now for over a year, and I've had no pinging or SES light. The tuner who tuned my car advanced the timing to be run with 93 octane, accordingly to the SCT tuner package. He also hooked up a Ford scan tool, and went for a ride with me. I floored it and everything, yet no detonation could be read, no pinging heard, and no SES. It all depends on the application and the specs of the situation.
 
K

Kilgore Trout

Fried or Broiled ?
10 Year Member
Mar 30, 2005
4,749
95
134
Sep 12, 2005
#6
  • Sep 12, 2005
  • #6
Dark Knight GT said:
I will agree that detonation can occur, and not be heard. However, the ECU would more than likely pick up on it eventually, and trigger the SES light. I've been running advanced ignition timing on 87 octane now for over a year, and I've had no pinging or SES light. The tuner who tuned my car advanced the timing to be run with 93 octane, accordingly to the SCT tuner package. He also hooked up a Ford scan tool, and went for a ride with me. I floored it and everything, yet no detonation could be read, no pinging heard, and no SES. It all depends on the application and the specs of the situation.
Click to expand...
How would the PCM "pick up on it"? Only Cobras have knock sensors. As far as I know, there is no way a GT PCM could respond to detonation...
 

[Twitch]

Member
Mar 30, 2005
168
0
16
Montreal
Sep 12, 2005
#7
  • Sep 12, 2005
  • #7
Kilgore Trout said:
How would the PCM "pick up on it"? Only Cobras have knock sensors. As far as I know, there is no way a GT PCM could respond to detonation...
Click to expand...

Last time I heard, 2V don't have knock sensors
 

Dark Knight GT

I can't get it up......ok that didn't sound right.
May 26, 2003
3,653
2
56
Ozark, Missouri
Sep 13, 2005
#8
  • Sep 13, 2005
  • #8
Kilgore Trout said:
How would the PCM "pick up on it"? Only Cobras have knock sensors. As far as I know, there is no way a GT PCM could respond to detonation...
Click to expand...
I dont know, but I know the guy who was scanning the ECU told me he wasn't picking up any indication of any pinging. I don't know what he was reading then. I forgot about the whole knock sensor thing. Haven't heard that in years actually lol. There has to be some way the ECU could detect detonation, just not sure how exactly.

Anyone got any extra information on this ?
 

twogts4us

15 Year Member
Apr 1, 2004
4,188
12
79
Dunedin, FL
Sep 13, 2005
#9
  • Sep 13, 2005
  • #9
Dark Knight GT said:
I dont know, but I know the guy who was scanning the ECU told me he wasn't picking up any indication of any pinging. I don't know what he was reading then. I forgot about the whole knock sensor thing. Haven't heard that in years actually lol. There has to be some way the ECU could detect detonation, just not sure how exactly.

Anyone got any extra information on this ?
Click to expand...
Dude was jerking your chain bro...
 
B

Bullitt0616

New Member
Aug 31, 2005
96
0
0
Sep 14, 2005
#10
  • Sep 14, 2005
  • #10
well ive re-installed the normal diablo tune until i can dyno my car for maximum safety and power extraction.

im waiting for my 4.10s to arrive - that should give me a boost of fun
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Resolved 93 Mustang 5.0 - Cranks but does not start
  • dan50
  • Jul 18, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
6
Views
194
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 18, 2026
dan50
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
991
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
98 GT PI Swapped Engine Fires, Dies Immediately NOT PATS
  • MMccPerformance
  • Dec 2, 2023
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
2K
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Dec 20, 2023
Yel2002GTAuto
Y
J
Progress Thread Family member 1989 GT- Backstory and updates
  • JRC99
  • Apr 19, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 26, 2025
JRC99
J
Progress Thread 2.3L - crank no start issue. Has spark, fuel, good compression.
  • joystang
  • Jun 21, 2023
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 9 10 11
Replies
204
Views
24K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Aug 20, 2024
AeroCoupe
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?