• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Spring Help - Does This Look Right?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 65-Fstbk
  • Start date Start date Jun 18, 2012

65-Fstbk

15 Year Member
May 20, 2007
316
26
49
Vancouver, B.C. Canada
Jun 18, 2012
#1
  • Jun 18, 2012
  • #1

I am putting the front suspension back on the car and am using the 600lb performance springs. My question is that when I get the spring in place on the perch, one side (inboard) sits in the seat but the outboard side is well off the perch.

When the suspension is put under load the spindle comes up to make the spring contact the perch but without load this is how it sits. The shocks aren't in yet but are the shocks designed to carry the weight of the from front assembly from dropping down too far. I have also lowered the upper A-arms 1".

Can anyone tell me if this is common when installing performance springs?
 

Cisco66@Cal-Mustang

New Member
Jun 5, 2012
5
0
1
City Of Industry
Jun 18, 2012
#2
  • Jun 18, 2012
  • #2
I have installed quite a few of these on my personal cars, and everytime it looks like the picture you posted... Generally when installing these you need to jack-up the lower control arm until the coil is level with the spring seat, once its level you can install the shock and lower the car... There wont be too much weight on the shock... hope this helps a bit. let me know...
 

Hwyman

Member
Nov 25, 2010
58
2
9
Bakersfield, CA
Jun 18, 2012
#3
  • Jun 18, 2012
  • #3
I hope that's how it is supposed to look. I put 620 1" lower springs in my 66 and they looked just like that while installing. I also did the "Shelby" drop. I was worried that they may fall out while driving. Once I got it all back together, including the sway bar, and set it on the ground, all looked well. I have had the front off the ground many times since then and everything is still in the right place. I mention the sway bar because once I got it on, the LCA seemed to come up a little and make the spring more secure.
 
2

2+2GT

10 Year Member
Apr 25, 2009
3,333
10
79
Southeastern Pennsylvania
Jun 18, 2012
#4
  • Jun 18, 2012
  • #4
The Ford Shop Manual specifies placing a piece of wood between the upper arm and frame rail, which you did not do.

 

horse sence

15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
12,169
7,979
233
Wile Coyote's stunt double
Jun 18, 2012
#5
  • Jun 18, 2012
  • #5
the shocks will not allow the front to droop far enough to have the springs fall out
long as you dont plan on jumping the car the shocks should not travel to the end
on typical driving situations
 

65-Fstbk

15 Year Member
May 20, 2007
316
26
49
Vancouver, B.C. Canada
Jun 19, 2012
#6
  • Jun 19, 2012
  • #6
Thanks all. I will post a pic when it's all back together.

As a side note I have been looking for a 16:1 ratio steering box to replace my stock 19:1 unit. I spoke with our local Mustang shop and they had a great suggestion. Keep the original factory box with all it's correct date codes and have it converted to 16:1. They directed me to a steering shop that has been doing this for years. They are rebuilding and converting my existing box to a 16:1 unit for $325.00 which I thought was very reasonable.
 

Cisco66@Cal-Mustang

New Member
Jun 5, 2012
5
0
1
City Of Industry
Jun 19, 2012
#7
  • Jun 19, 2012
  • #7
Looking good man... Cant wait to see the end result. horse sence makes a good point... Good tip wit the wood block too, just dont forget to take it out...
 

horseballz

10 Year Member
Sep 30, 2009
824
19
49
Las Vegas, NV
Jun 19, 2012
#8
  • Jun 19, 2012
  • #8
I got one thing to say: "Roller Perches Baby!"
Gene
 

65-Fstbk

15 Year Member
May 20, 2007
316
26
49
Vancouver, B.C. Canada
Jun 19, 2012
#9
  • Jun 19, 2012
  • #9
LOL I knew somebody would pipe up about roller perches. I totally agree but unfortunately not in the budget right now. Besides I need something to do on future weekends right!!!!!
 

horse sence

15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
12,169
7,979
233
Wile Coyote's stunt double
Jun 19, 2012
#10
  • Jun 19, 2012
  • #10
2+2GT said:
The Ford Shop Manual specifies placing a piece of wood between the upper arm and frame rail, which you did not do.

Click to expand...
hey 2+2 that your horse looks like a 68 going by the door hinges, were are the pics ? looks like you have a nice ride going there
 

Falcon79

Active Member
Apr 6, 2009
214
8
29
Dallas, TX
Jun 20, 2012
#11
  • Jun 20, 2012
  • #11
Yeah 2+2, lets have some pics! It looks like a top quality job you are doing.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

New Products From J&M Products - 1979-1998 & 1999-2004 Race/Extreme Duty Rear Lower Control Arms
  • J&M Products
  • Oct 9, 2025
  • Vendor Sponsor Forums
Replies
0
Views
234
Vendor Sponsor Forums Oct 9, 2025
J&M Products
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
655
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 28, 2026
Noobz347
A
SOLD For Sale: 1993 Ford Mustang Cobra Modified
  • anjteal93
  • Sep 5, 2025
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
13
Views
1K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Oct 26, 2025
Mindseye007
0
V6 to V8 Swap info
  • 02_2v_Curtis
  • Jan 11, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
560
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jan 11, 2026
02_2v_Curtis
0
Progress Thread Low Mile 89 GT Restomod - Building Subframe Connectors
  • KRUISR
  • Jan 4, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
50
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 21, 2026
KRUISR
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?