Just to warn you my dad gave me his springs because he said they sagged, I think he just didn't like the stance they gave his car. My car had a nearly inperceptible reverse California rake, which is supposed to better for the Ackerman steering motion of the rear axleMSM0075 said:I would like to go eibach beacuse its most popular wich usually means reliability. Plus I want to lower the car a bit for handling...
I work for Advance Auto and in looking in the catalog the 2.3 and 5.0 had the exact same p/n's. I was wondering this myself. My assumption is that they are significently stiffer and with the fact the lower that they should work fine.Lx89Stang05 said:any one here uses eibach V8 spirings on there 2.3?? i was thing of doing it since . i want a realy stiff car. and the 2.3 springs are harder to find and i could get some nice v8 eibach ones off evilbay.
i just dont want to frontend to be riding high. cause of the weight difference between the v8 and 4TheNoachSHO said:I work for Advance Auto and in looking in the catalog the 2.3 and 5.0 had the exact same p/n's. I was wondering this myself. My assumption is that they are significently stiffer and with the fact the lower that they should work fine.
I agree, its a tad bit too low.Lx89Stang05 said:that looks way to low, i dont like tire tucking, but thats just me
If you're wanting it to handle better, a little more heigth in the front is supposed to be good for Ackerman (the way the rear axle tweaks diagonaly making the wheels move fore and aft , giving a rear steering effect) But it'll look kinda silly. Gof I wanna get my stang running again.Lx89Stang05 said:i just dont want to frontend to be riding high. cause of the weight difference between the v8 and 4
MSM0075 said:I agree, its a tad bit too low.
Cougar said:17" Adobe Photoshops
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?