• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Starting to get discouraged by the ls1/lt1 talk...

  • Thread starter Thread starter SashaBlack
  • Start date Start date Aug 12, 2010
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Next
1 of 5 Next Last

SashaBlack

New Member
Jun 18, 2009
32
0
0
Orlando, Florida, born and raised
Aug 12, 2010
#1
  • Aug 12, 2010
  • #1
Hey all, last night (like every night) I just type random things into google and find forums to look up about fox mustangs, how badass they are, etc. well I stumbled across a LS1/LT1 forum that was many pages long, talking about how the fox 5.0 isn't CRAP compared to the LS/LT. At first I was smirking and saying to myself, "Fox's are the ****nit and there's nothing you can say about it," but by about the 3rd page of reading it was starting to make sense. I'm HOPING I'm wrong, but does it really take a heck-load of work to get into the 12's for a 5.0?

I have 4.10 gears, bigger maf, rebuilt tranny, bore'd over to 306, UDP's, Motorcraft Distributor, CAI, Bigger Throttle body, and about to install an Exploder Intake.

Do I really not stand a chance even against the LT1's? this is depressing me, being I converted from chevy about 2 years back when I've had 2 motors blow on me, while im on my third mustang that seem bulletproof.

PLEASE clue me in. I'm not trying to rally up some men here for a trash talk on GM, but I do want some encouragement and tell me I'm wrong!
 

NIKwoaC

中國製造
15 Year Member
Oct 31, 2006
5,525
943
214
Chengdu Province
Aug 12, 2010
#2
  • Aug 12, 2010
  • #2
You just opened a can of worms, man.
 

MAC'n89Blckstng

Active Member
Jun 11, 2003
1,012
4
36
NJ
Aug 12, 2010
#3
  • Aug 12, 2010
  • #3
There is a couple cars that get into the twelves with BONE STOCK motors and just weight savings, your mods, big and littles with sticky tires, exhaust, etc. Is your car auto? that could be a big restricter on your speed. A good driver can hit 12's easy with a relatively stock car. I'm runnin 13.0 with slicks with your basic GT40 steel heads, e303 cam, and explorer intake with 4.10s and exhaust. Look up 25thmustang, he gets some seriously good times with his car and he also has a very very modest set up.
 

Strype

Cuthbert catcher
Founding Member
May 11, 1999
61
34
104
Huntsvegas, AL
Aug 12, 2010
#4
  • Aug 12, 2010
  • #4
The stock LT1 will kill a stock 5.0... Coming from someone who has owned both and seen numerous races.

The ONLY time I have ever seen a stock 5.0 roll door to door with a 93+ Camaro was actually my 93 back in the day when my friend owned it, and he was running drag radials on it at the time. The notches are light enough to be a threat, but on a kickdown there is no way.

Pretty much got rid of my first 5.0 for a 95 Formula LT1. That car would romp on a 5.0.

BUT...

One thing you need to understand is that the 5.0 was really geared more toward the working man. It was cheap in comparison to the other pony cars. It was affordable and had a 302 truck motor slapped into it.

Now the LS1... I'm not afraid of them anymore but I have heads/cam/intake.
 

90lxcoupe

20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 7, 2003
3,596
350
134
Aug 12, 2010
#5
  • Aug 12, 2010
  • #5
ok first off i give this thread like 3 minutes before an argument starts, so i guess i'll stir the pot.


You cant really compare the 5.0 to the LS, they are decades ahead in technology and putting one in a fox will get you AT LEAST 10's on a stock bottom end, and there are a few guys ive seen on the internet that have run high 9's with a stock bottom end, you cant rreallly do that with a stock 5 litre without boost.

LS swaps are badass, if i build another car thats what im planning, but most guys hate them, which is fine, but some of the brand loyal arguments are just rediculous, how much ford stuff is left on a serious street/strip mustang?
 

Strype

Cuthbert catcher
Founding Member
May 11, 1999
61
34
104
Huntsvegas, AL
Aug 12, 2010
#6
  • Aug 12, 2010
  • #6
90lxcoupe said:
You cant really compare the 5.0 to the LS, they are decades ahead in technology
Click to expand...

TROOF.

You would come more closely comparing the 1993-1997(8?) LT1. Which will kill a 5.0 in no time flat.


Guys were running 8.9's in the 1/8 mile on street tires in Formulas and 9.0-9.1 in T/A's and Camaros. The stock 5.0 will usually get a 9.4-9.5 on a GREAT day.

Now again, with drag radials I saw my friend drive my car to a 9.0 but it is a notch and he had exhaust and drag radials.
 

Shaolin Crane

Banned
Oct 6, 2008
2,627
7
0
Kommiefornia
Aug 12, 2010
#7
  • Aug 12, 2010
  • #7
IBTL
 

Shaolin Crane

Banned
Oct 6, 2008
2,627
7
0
Kommiefornia
Aug 12, 2010
#8
  • Aug 12, 2010
  • #8
90lxcoupe said:
ok first off i give this thread like 3 minutes before an argument starts, so i guess i'll stir the pot.


You cant really compare the 5.0 to the LS, they are decades ahead in technology and putting one in a fox will get you AT LEAST 10's on a stock bottom end, and there are a few guys ive seen on the internet that have run high 9's with a stock bottom end, you cant rreallly do that with a stock 5 litre without boost.

LS swaps are badass, if i build another car thats what im planning, but most guys hate them, which is fine, but some of the brand loyal arguments are just rediculous, how much ford stuff is left on a serious street/strip mustang?
Click to expand...
Lol, how many ford parts do you think are left on our cars?
 

SashaBlack

New Member
Jun 18, 2009
32
0
0
Orlando, Florida, born and raised
Aug 12, 2010
#9
  • Aug 12, 2010
  • #9
Yes I do have a T5 in my girl, and from what you are all saying, and what is posted in sigs, after the Explorer intake I should go straight for some heads. I am just making sure i don't make the mistake of underrating a little lt1 and getting fisted.

I understand that mod for mod the lt is stronger, but I'm hoping with the weight transfer capability and light weight frame of fellow fox's, we can live to fight another day.
 

ttopstang

Active Member
Sep 6, 2007
306
1
28
Birmingham, AL
Aug 12, 2010
#10
  • Aug 12, 2010
  • #10
My brother just sold his 2000 camaro ss and bought a 92 lx. Yes, the mustang is slower, but you can actually work on them. You dont have to plan a whole night to change the spark plugs out. The interiors on the chevy are very cheap. And a chevy will NEVER sound like a ford. Parts are cheaper, and fox bodies look better.
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,260
17,945
224
Massachusetts
Aug 12, 2010
#11
  • Aug 12, 2010
  • #11
To me...the 5.0 is crap as well.

Instead of spending $5000-10000 on a 331 with AL heads, custom cam, high end parts, etc etc to make a reliable 450HP N/A with choppy idle, loud and tempermental, i would rather just shoehorn a stock 5.0 Coyote motor in, and have over 400HP on an engine you prob couldn't even tell was running most of the time.

The 5.0 is technology from the early 60's. There are plenty of V6 engines out there that can beat a mild 5.0. I have videos of me at the track in my stock G35 sedan beating friends with gears, bolt ons, etc on their 5.0's.

Back in the late 90's, i use to drive my Fox around thinking I could handle 90% of the cars on the road. These days, i drive around with 400HP muscle cars and 300HP family sedans on the road thinking to myself "Damn, i hope this Maxima doesn't smoke me"


Whatever...they are a flawed vehicle...but we love them.
 

SashaBlack

New Member
Jun 18, 2009
32
0
0
Orlando, Florida, born and raised
Aug 12, 2010
#12
  • Aug 12, 2010
  • #12
You are completely right there. the sound a ford v8 makes is just phenomenal. even when I had my chevy, and was hatin' on fords, I secretly admired the sound. that really just made me think how close-minded people (including me) can be at times.
 

NIKwoaC

中國製造
15 Year Member
Oct 31, 2006
5,525
943
214
Chengdu Province
Aug 12, 2010
#13
  • Aug 12, 2010
  • #13
Mustang5L5 said:
To me...the 5.0 is crap as well.

Instead of spending $5000-10000 on a 331 with AL heads, custom cam, high end parts, etc etc to make a reliable 450HP N/A with choppy idle, loud and tempermental, i would rather just shoehorn a stock 5.0 Coyote motor in, and have over 400HP on an engine you prob couldn't even tell was running most of the time.

The 5.0 is technology from the early 60's. There are plenty of V6 engines out there that can beat a mild 5.0. I have videos of me at the track in my stock G35 sedan beating friends with gears, bolt ons, etc on their 5.0's.

Back in the late 90's, i use to drive my Fox around thinking I could handle 90% of the cars on the road. These days, i drive around with 400HP muscle cars and 300HP family sedans on the road thinking to myself "Damn, i hope this Maxima doesn't smoke me"


Whatever...they are a flawed vehicle...but we love them.
Click to expand...

Have you been hanging out with Gearbanger?
 

SashaBlack

New Member
Jun 18, 2009
32
0
0
Orlando, Florida, born and raised
Aug 12, 2010
#14
  • Aug 12, 2010
  • #14
5L5, you know you make a great point. anyone to walk around saying there 5.0 is the best there is, is ridiculous. these late 2000's cars are outstanding, and quite frankly I hate it.
 

SashaBlack

New Member
Jun 18, 2009
32
0
0
Orlando, Florida, born and raised
Aug 12, 2010
#15
  • Aug 12, 2010
  • #15
Don't rag me plz, I'm still learning. but what is a 331? is it a stroked 302?
 

90lxcoupe

20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 7, 2003
3,596
350
134
Aug 12, 2010
#16
  • Aug 12, 2010
  • #16
ttopstang said:
My brother just sold his 2000 camaro ss and bought a 92 lx. Yes, the mustang is slower, but you can actually work on them. You dont have to plan a whole night to change the spark plugs out. The interiors on the chevy are very cheap. And a chevy will NEVER sound like a ford. Parts are cheaper, and fox bodies look better.
Click to expand...

or you could have the best of both worlds by combining the two cars

Shaolin Crane said:
Lol, how many ford parts do you think are left on our cars?
Click to expand...

My block is the only ford part in my driveline
 

Shaolin Crane

Banned
Oct 6, 2008
2,627
7
0
Kommiefornia
Aug 12, 2010
#17
  • Aug 12, 2010
  • #17
ttopstang said:
My brother just sold his 2000 camaro ss and bought a 92 lx. Yes, the mustang is slower, but you can actually work on them. You dont have to plan a whole night to change the spark plugs out. The interiors on the chevy are very cheap. And a chevy will NEVER sound like a ford. Parts are cheaper, and fox bodies look better.
Click to expand...

i had a 99 SS, and im sorry but are you really comparing interior quality of a fox to an SS? And im sorry but a true dual LS1 sounds ****in badass, just gotta get rid of the y pipe bull****. And i can see how working on a LSx series is difficult if you arent proficient with tools, no worse than a modular or big block though
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,260
17,945
224
Massachusetts
Aug 12, 2010
#18
  • Aug 12, 2010
  • #18
NikwoaC said:
Have you been hanging out with Gearbanger?
Click to expand...


Lol

It's a fun, easy to work on simple little motor to work on for a hobby like this, but facts are that technology has produced many engines lately that are superior.

 

Shaolin Crane

Banned
Oct 6, 2008
2,627
7
0
Kommiefornia
Aug 12, 2010
#19
  • Aug 12, 2010
  • #19
90lxcoupe said:
or you could have the best of both worlds by combining the two cars



My block is the only ford part in my driveline
Click to expand...

Once my stock engine comes out the only thing ford will be the unibody
 

25thmustang

Mustang Master
Sep 5, 2003
2,021
85
99
Montgomery, NY
Aug 12, 2010
#20
  • Aug 12, 2010
  • #20
The sooner you care less and less about other cars, the happier you will be in life. Trust me on this, I used to argue about it all the time, and try and defend any and all cars. Now I simply mod/enjoy what I have, and let everyone else do the same.

BTW, I have fun with stock LS1 cars, the few times I have challeneged or been challenged by them. Two of my best races were with LS1s.
 
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Next
1 of 5 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

SOLD Rebuilt EcuExchange 87'-'93 A9L Computer: $325
  • Habu135
  • Jan 28, 2024
  • Engine and Power Adder
Replies
2
Views
1K
Engine and Power Adder Feb 16, 2024
Habu135
SN Mustang Magnum T56 swap
  • revhead347
  • May 24, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
15
Views
6K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jun 28, 2026
GearHeadGuy
B
I Watch, I Wait, someday it will pop up
  • BoatsHateMe
  • Aug 21, 2021
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
9
Views
1K
The Welcome Wagon Aug 23, 2021
Potomus Pete
C
First fox, Now what route do I take?
  • Canadian5.0
  • Sep 28, 2019
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
38
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 22, 2019
Canadian5.0
C
  • Locked
“Doing stuff the wrong way for the right reasons”: A related stupid story.
  • CarMichael Angelo
  • Apr 26, 2020
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 27, 2020
a91what
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?