• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

stay with 3:55 or go 4:10

  • Thread starter Thread starter screamingmach1
  • Start date Start date Apr 9, 2004
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

MAC[H]Z

New Member
Mar 9, 2004
152
0
0
NH
Apr 11, 2004
#21
  • Apr 11, 2004
  • #21
I posted this on another board but I'll copy and paste it here as it is relative to the topic..


I am doing a axle upgrade next week and I have had all my parts for a few weeks now, Moser axles, 31 spline trac lok, 4.10 gears but after my trip to the dyno last week I boxed up the 4.10's so I could exchange them for 4.30's

At the dyno my car and the other machs there made peak HP between 4800-6300 and I'm not talking peaked there it was almost flat all the way across. These cars have a nice long power curve and they don't drop off until very high RPM's.

The dyno has the ability to tell you what gears will keep you in the power longer and for our cars NA the 4.30's were the better gear..

Here is a link from the dyno shop web page with our cars on it. Take a look at our dyno sheets and notice the nice long curve.. http://www.performance-dyno.com/pages/7/index.htm


and with the .62 5th at 70mph the car only turns 2442 rpm vs 2329 for the 4.10
 
R

RedGTvert

Founding Member
Nov 21, 1999
3,129
1
58
Wellington, FL
Apr 11, 2004
#22
  • Apr 11, 2004
  • #22
wms004 said:
you are the first person i've heard say that 4.10's are a waste
Click to expand...

You can't think in terms of a GT. This is a 4V which winds out further. I am thinking in terms of a Mach 1.
 

wms004

Founding Member
Jan 15, 2002
2,864
2
49
Los Angeles
Apr 12, 2004
#23
  • Apr 12, 2004
  • #23
RedGTvert said:
You can't think in terms of a GT. This is a 4V which winds out further. I am thinking in terms of a Mach 1.
Click to expand...
that logic does make sense, but I still don't think 3.55's to 4.10's would be a WASTE of money at all.. If you don't like winding up way over 3k on the highway and still want a performance increase, even though not optimal in 1/4 mile for the mach1, 4.10's would still be well worth the swap. my opinion
 

BadMoFo

I will sleep with a Mod for a CT
Founding Member
Sep 28, 2001
2,911
0
0
New Bern NC
Apr 12, 2004
#24
  • Apr 12, 2004
  • #24
I have a 99 cobra 4v with 4.10's. wish I had gotten 4.30's. but definatly get rid of the 3.55's.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

S
Drivetrain Downshifting from 3rd to 2nd issue
  • Scott_S
  • Apr 23, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
771
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jun 14, 2026
Mindseye007
P
2000 GT Random Power Loss
  • Pinellas50
  • Mar 9, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
306
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Mar 23, 2026
Pinellas50
P
9
Will I feel a difference
  • 90Stanger302
  • Mar 12, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
263
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Apr 13, 2026
Noobz347
P
67 Mustang, with the 302 want to convert auto back to the original manual
  • Pdunn
  • May 3, 2026
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
2
Views
137
Classic Mustang Specific Tech May 7, 2026
Mcmahst
D
96 get convertible-sell or part out?
  • DTCstang
  • May 17, 2026
  • What is it Worth?!?!?
Replies
5
Views
149
What is it Worth?!?!? May 18, 2026
nickyb
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?