• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-

Steeda or MM???

  • Thread starter Thread starter SaleenGT2001
  • Start date Start date Mar 9, 2008

which caster/camber plates

  • Steeda

    Votes: 3 17.6%
  • Maximum Motorsports

    Votes: 14 82.4%

  • Total voters
    17

SaleenGT2001

Well-Known Member
Jul 18, 2005
2,811
4
58
Four Oaks NC
Mar 9, 2008
#1
  • Mar 9, 2008
  • #1
just want to get everyones opinionon what plates they would buy if price was not an option. if you could get either set for free which would it be?
 
9

97speedster

New Member
Jan 16, 2007
134
1
0
stanwood,wa
Mar 9, 2008
#2
  • Mar 9, 2008
  • #2
can't agrue facts here.
http://www.steeda.com/products/steeda_aluminum_4_bolt_caster_cam.php

some one have specs for MM? I can't seem to find them
 

SaleenGT2001

Well-Known Member
Jul 18, 2005
2,811
4
58
Four Oaks NC
Mar 9, 2008
#3
  • Mar 9, 2008
  • #3
Thank you for purchasing Maximum Motorsports’ Caster/
Camber Plates.
Our Caster/Camber Plates are designed
to maximize the performance of your Mustang’s front
suspension. You will find many features that set our
Caster/Camber Plates apart from the rest:

• The widest range of camber adjustment in the
industry: Side-to-side reversible bearing plates double
the camber adjustment with the underhood space
limitations for camber slot length.

• Lifetime guaranteed high grade Teflon® lined spherical
bearings are used at the strut top mounting point.
Urethane bushings do not provide positive location,
and induce bending loads on the strut that reduce the
strut’s lifespan and may even break the strut shaft.

• The main plates are spaced above the strut tower,
while maintaining good hood clearance, to restore
bump travel for lowered cars.

• Our unique design places the bearing cup on top of
the main plate, further maximizing precious bump
travel with the low hoodline of 94+ cars. Bearing plates
placed under the main plate typically have 1/2” less
bump travel than our configuration.

• High grade alloy steel allows our plates to be thin and
fatigue proof. Aluminum plates must be very thick and
will un-necessarily reduce bump travel and hood
clearance.

• Patented 4 bolt X 4 bolt configuration. This means that
4 bolts secure the bearing plate to evenly spread the
load into the main plate. 4 bolts also secure the main
plate to the car’s strut tower to eliminate strut tower
bending.

• Lifetime warranty against main plate bending.
 
B

bdcardinal

tree hugger
Jun 10, 2003
3,612
16
69
santa barbara, CA
Mar 9, 2008
#4
  • Mar 9, 2008
  • #4
MM all the way.
 

LaserSVT

Got FB banned again for saying nards
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
9,389
3,536
233
Mar 9, 2008
#5
  • Mar 9, 2008
  • #5
Yep MM +2 The only Steeda part I like better are their Upper/Lower Aluminum control arms with the three piece bushings Well thier 5-link is killer too but just too damn expensive
 

BennyBlown2v

New Member
Dec 9, 2004
1,233
1
0
Carmel, INdiana
Mar 9, 2008
#6
  • Mar 9, 2008
  • #6
MM - steeda plates are OK but MM allows the most alignment travel and most adjustment for bump as well.
 

Flghtmstr1

Member
Mar 31, 2005
572
4
19
Springfield, PA
Mar 9, 2008
#7
  • Mar 9, 2008
  • #7
I have Maximum Motorsports on my car, and I was very impressed by the build quality and ease of installation of my caster/camber plates. My car aligned just fine, and they seem indestructible.
 

eliot22

Founding Member
Sep 10, 2000
1,461
0
36
San Diego, CA
Mar 10, 2008
#8
  • Mar 10, 2008
  • #8
Flghtmstr1 said:
I have Maximum Motorsports on my car, and I was very impressed by the build quality and ease of installation of my caster/camber plates. My car aligned just fine, and they seem indestructible.
Click to expand...
I have never heard of anyone that wasn't happy with any MM part.
 
B

bakos24

I find there is nothing better than a tasty wiener
Nov 29, 1999
4,461
87
134
NE, OH
Mar 11, 2008
#9
  • Mar 11, 2008
  • #9
I don't thing you could go wrong with either company. Both very reputable.
 

Poisoned Pony

Founding Member
Dec 17, 2000
286
0
17
Citrus Heights, CA
Mar 11, 2008
#10
  • Mar 11, 2008
  • #10
another vote for MM. You can't go wrong with them
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

D
Buying with a bad motor?
  • djj62478
  • Mar 8, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
239
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Mar 11, 2026
TTSaleen
B
Subframe connector question
  • B0udreaux
  • Jan 27, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
822
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 5, 2026
rednotch
Who the hell puts the wrong spark plugs in a 3.8L?
  • snowstang
  • Mar 25, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
12
Views
378
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Apr 3, 2026
LILCBRA
S
Car shakes when taking off help???
  • STANKYstangs
  • May 10, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
12
Views
187
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- May 27, 2026
LILCBRA
Engine 1986 GT Overheating issues
  • 86 5O GT
  • Jan 25, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
18
Views
453
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 29, 2026
86 5O GT
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?