• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Steeda Tri-Ax Shifter Vs MGW Shifter

  • Thread starter Thread starter UpRise_5.0
  • Start date Start date Sep 7, 2007
U

UpRise_5.0

Founding Member
Jun 16, 2002
664
1
16
Canada
Sep 7, 2007
#1
  • Sep 7, 2007
  • #1
Hey,

Which short throw shifter do you like better, the Steeda Tri-Ax Shifter or the MGW Shifter? And why? Pro and Cons. Or any difference?

Thanks
 
C

Chris_Red_V8

New Member
Dec 2, 2004
95
0
0
Scottsdale, Az
Sep 7, 2007
#2
  • Sep 7, 2007
  • #2
MGW, quieter, somewhat smoother. More adjustment in angle, and you can immediately tell the difference in build quality.
 

maximos

Member
Sep 15, 2005
188
0
16
Columbus, OH
Sep 7, 2007
#3
  • Sep 7, 2007
  • #3
+1
 

SublimeRT

Member
Jan 25, 2003
230
1
16
Clarksville, TN
Sep 7, 2007
#4
  • Sep 7, 2007
  • #4
The MGW does everything the Tri-Ax does but better. The only reason to get any other shifter over the MGW is if you're hell bent on using a shifter stick like this Hurst with the 2 mounting holes which does not mount to the MGW.

http://www.jegs.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/product_10001_10002_52226_-1
 

Killercanary

The car that set the bar.
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,676
1
76
Altoona, PA
Sep 7, 2007
#5
  • Sep 7, 2007
  • #5
Since I don't own a MGW, I will not comment on it other than to say that from locals I've talked to with it, I'll stick with my tri-ax.
 

Blackened302

Active Member
Jul 21, 2005
1,439
0
36
South TX
Sep 7, 2007
#6
  • Sep 7, 2007
  • #6
i've felt both but have a tri-ax (came w/ the tranny)--either are good enough for me.

thinking about cutting a couple of the coils in the springs to ease up the resistance, though.
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Sep 7, 2007
#7
  • Sep 7, 2007
  • #7
I haven't tried a MGW, looks just fine though!

However, I have ran the Pro 5.0, Tri-Ax, Hurst, B&M Ripper, and stock.

I would rate them in that order.

The Pro 5.0 has the shortest throw of them all, and includes new longer shifter mounting bolts to have more bites in the transmission so you do not rip out the old threads

The stoutness of the Pro 5.0 is very nice.

I had one on my 2000, and I have one on my daily driven '98 for a reason
 

94-302-vert

Active Member
Aug 16, 2004
1,947
2
36
NE CT
Sep 7, 2007
#8
  • Sep 7, 2007
  • #8
Whenver this comes up one resonse that always shows is to use a pro-5.o base with a tri-ax handle....

When i buy I am going pro 5.0 as I never heard anythign negative about them.
 

S351Saleen77

Member
Jun 27, 2002
423
0
16
Washington
Sep 7, 2007
#9
  • Sep 7, 2007
  • #9
I just bought another S351 and it has a Steeda in it. My other one has a Pro 5.0.

The Steeda is TERRIBLE compared to the Pro 5.0. If I didn't have the pro 5.0 I would probably think it was o.k.

I would like to try the MGW and see what they are like, I have heard great things about them!
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Sep 7, 2007
#10
  • Sep 7, 2007
  • #10
Another thing ... It can be about how you are made as well

As for me ... I got kinda long arms and legs

So I take some of these threads with that in mind when some say the
handle is not positioned correctly

Grady
 

Venom351R

Founding Member
Apr 27, 2002
4,548
41
98
MAINE
Sep 7, 2007
#11
  • Sep 7, 2007
  • #11
Ive had the Tri Ax and loved it, I have a pro 5.0 now and it feels more notchy but that could be due to the Tremmec 3550. The Tri Ax was on a stock 95 GT tranny. I have not tried the MGW other then shifting one in a friends car. Id get one for mine if they made it for the 3550
 

SublimeRT

Member
Jan 25, 2003
230
1
16
Clarksville, TN
Sep 7, 2007
#12
  • Sep 7, 2007
  • #12
Redline_351R said:
Id get one for mine if they made it for the 3550
Click to expand...

They have a new one for the TKO 500/600 that should work on your 3550 also.
 

mo_dingo

20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 26, 2003
3,031
2
58
Tucson, AZ
Sep 9, 2007
#13
  • Sep 9, 2007
  • #13
Chris_Red_V8 said:
MGW, quieter, somewhat smoother. More adjustment in angle, and you can immediately tell the difference in build quality.
Click to expand...

QFTMFT
 
U

UpRise_5.0

Founding Member
Jun 16, 2002
664
1
16
Canada
Sep 12, 2007
#14
  • Sep 12, 2007
  • #14
Ergonomically which shifter do you find better suited for the 1994-95 Mustang GTs.
 
9

94v6GT

New Member
May 13, 2006
141
0
0
Sep 12, 2007
#15
  • Sep 12, 2007
  • #15
i think the MGW advertises 360 degree rotation for the handle so idealy you could dial it in. supposed to be 'the quietest' too.
-IMHO i think the whole topic is over thought. as long as it has positve stops, it will work fine and is better that stock.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

K
Console Heat after MGW shifter install
  • KirkACola
  • Sep 24, 2025
  • 2010 - 2014 Specific Tech
Replies
13
Views
497
2010 - 2014 Specific Tech Sep 24, 2025
Noobz347
Progress Thread The Mach Returns - Update/build thread
  • squeak93
  • Feb 20, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
329
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jun 1, 2026
squeak93
Tuners come on inside
  • squeak93
  • Feb 13, 2026
  • SVT Tech Forum
Replies
1
Views
252
SVT Tech Forum Feb 20, 2026
squeak93
For Sale Borg Warner WC T5, Stock Bell Housing, RAM Clutch Set, Double Hump Cross Member, & Pro 5.0 Shifter
  • AeroCoupe
  • Aug 9, 2025
  • Drivetrain Parts
Replies
1
Views
607
Drivetrain Parts Dec 26, 2025
AeroCoupe
H
Transmission Help
  • Harman78
  • Feb 20, 2025
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
267
SN95 V6 Mustang Tech Feb 21, 2025
Harman78
H
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?