• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

STG 1 CAMS 101

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mattstang04
  • Start date Start date Oct 20, 2008
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
1 of 3 Next Last

Mattstang04

15 Year Member
Sep 15, 2006
1,152
144
104
St. Louis, MO
Oct 20, 2008
#1
  • Oct 20, 2008
  • #1
Take me to school. My interests are rising for a set of stg 1 cams for my 73xxx highway mile gt. I wont change valvesprings, I want to do them myself, I want to maintain reliability, driveability while still getting the most out of a cam swap of this level. So what cams are the best, worst, and most popular? I was considering comp cams. I heard VT stg 1s were the way to go but they have now changed manufacturers. Issues? I dont know alot about modular cam manufacturers. Stangnet rocks:SNSign:, let me know what your opinions are.
 

98COBRA281

10 Year Member
Nov 24, 2007
1,348
30
59
Port St. Lucie, Florida
Oct 20, 2008
#2
  • Oct 20, 2008
  • #2
vt cams are now CMS, with stage 1 you wont have to change valve springs, but it cant hurt, your reliability and drivability will be fine with stage 1's, my cams have almost the exact same specs as cms stage 1's.......
 

Mattstang04

15 Year Member
Sep 15, 2006
1,152
144
104
St. Louis, MO
Oct 20, 2008
#3
  • Oct 20, 2008
  • #3
Are the CMSs a good quality like the VTs? What kind of performance gains do these generally produce? Would I have to degree these cams?
 

98COBRA281

10 Year Member
Nov 24, 2007
1,348
30
59
Port St. Lucie, Florida
Oct 20, 2008
#4
  • Oct 20, 2008
  • #4
Mattstang04 said:
Are the CMSs a good quality like the VTs? What kind of performance gains do these generally produce? Would I have to degree these cams?
Click to expand...

CMS are the exact same cams as the old VT's, i think that cms stage 1's are good for about 20-25rwhp...........
 

CobraRed_96_GT

Active Member
May 20, 2006
1,421
4
39
UCSD/La Jolla
Oct 20, 2008
#5
  • Oct 20, 2008
  • #5
CMS stands for Cushman Motorsports, and Jim Cushman is the one who designed the cams so they are exactly the same. Still cut by the same people as well.
In the real world they are good for about 16-21rwhp peak vs peak against PI cams. But at 5800-6100k vs PI cams it's closer to 25-30rwhp.
And cam specs being very similar or even the same don't really say a lot about behavior (not that yours are worse in anyway 98Cobra), i could design a cam that averages out to the same duration and LSA and they wouldn't even run in the car. Although LSA is more telling since you're using two data points instead of 4 like duration.
 

Mattstang04

15 Year Member
Sep 15, 2006
1,152
144
104
St. Louis, MO
Oct 20, 2008
#6
  • Oct 20, 2008
  • #6
I like wat Im hearing so far. Would the motor be damaged by reving into those higher rpms? And is there any power or torque loss in the bottom end? I drive this car 100 miles every day because I work 50 mile from home. I know there will be a loss in mpg so Im trying to be as educated about the selection process as I can.
 

02nightmaregt

To hell with your Mustang, I want to see your HOG!
Jul 1, 2007
513
4
19
Southern Indiana
Oct 20, 2008
#7
  • Oct 20, 2008
  • #7
:OT: I would look into another DD. Thats a few miles.
 

lvmustanggt

New Member
Apr 9, 2006
721
0
0
Las Vegas
Oct 21, 2008
#8
  • Oct 21, 2008
  • #8
Don't do cams . 100 miles a days is way too much driving for mustang gt, get better DD like imports.
 

CobraRed_96_GT

Active Member
May 20, 2006
1,421
4
39
UCSD/La Jolla
Oct 21, 2008
#9
  • Oct 21, 2008
  • #9
Cams aren't going to hurt your highway mileage too much at all. Before heads and cams i was getting like 22-22.5 on the freeway, now it's exactly 21.6. Around town is where it hurts. And revving wont hurt anything as long as you have the proper oil levels. I rev to 6400 in datalogging and am setting up my tune to shift around 6250-6300.
 

Green&GoldGT

Member
Aug 1, 2005
302
0
17
Virginia
Oct 21, 2008
#10
  • Oct 21, 2008
  • #10
There are some companies, I believe one is Crower or Comp that sell cams intended to save gas and increase performance slightly. I haven't cared to look into them, but it doesn't seem worth the money for those small benefits. If you are looking for cams, you shouldn't care about MPG.
 

kuwait

Member
Mar 31, 2005
194
0
17
Oct 21, 2008
#11
  • Oct 21, 2008
  • #11
Mattstang04 said:
I like wat Im hearing so far. Would the motor be damaged by reving into those higher rpms? And is there any power or torque loss in the bottom end? I drive this car 100 miles every day because I work 50 mile from home. I know there will be a loss in mpg so Im trying to be as educated about the selection process as I can.
Click to expand...

i didnt notice any mileage loss on the highway , its just abit worse in go and stop traffic and around town , you don't lose torque down low , in fact i can feel it getting some if anything , i am revving my car to 6k with the stock springs and the car aint complaining , just tune the car and it will be fine
 

Winters98GT

Whoop...whoop-whoop-whoop-whoop...GANGNAM STYLE!!!
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,520
1,291
224
H Town
Oct 21, 2008
#12
  • Oct 21, 2008
  • #12
I would add a set of springs to any aftermarket set of cams. It's better to pay the couple hundred dollars and do it right, than to risk the entire motor.
 

98COBRA281

10 Year Member
Nov 24, 2007
1,348
30
59
Port St. Lucie, Florida
Oct 21, 2008
#13
  • Oct 21, 2008
  • #13
Winters98GT said:
I would add a set of springs to any aftermarket set of cams. It's better to pay the couple hundred dollars and do it right, than to risk the entire motor.
Click to expand...

yeah, i only paid about $190 for my comp beehive springs.........
 
O

OC Stang

New Member
Jul 21, 2003
83
0
0
Orange County, CA
Oct 21, 2008
#14
  • Oct 21, 2008
  • #14
I am considering getting some cams too.

What would it cost to have them installed? Not sure I would want to tackle that myself.
 

CobraRed_96_GT

Active Member
May 20, 2006
1,421
4
39
UCSD/La Jolla
Oct 21, 2008
#15
  • Oct 21, 2008
  • #15
98COBRA281 said:
yeah, i only paid about $190 for my comp beehive springs.........
Click to expand...
I paid 100 shipped, cheap insurance for the 6100+ range.

OC Stang said:
I am considering getting some cams too.

What would it cost to have them installed? Not sure I would want to tackle that myself.
Click to expand...
Stage 1's aren't bad to install yourself if you've been around a wrench for awhile. I've done 2 sets. But if you want to leave it up to the pros it really varies a lot for install prices.
 

98COBRA281

10 Year Member
Nov 24, 2007
1,348
30
59
Port St. Lucie, Florida
Oct 21, 2008
#16
  • Oct 21, 2008
  • #16
CobraRed_96_GT said:
I paid 100 shipped, cheap insurance for the 6100+ range.
Click to expand...

dang good price, i searched all over, and the cheapest i found was $190.00, and i couldnt find any used ones........
 

CobraRed_96_GT

Active Member
May 20, 2006
1,421
4
39
UCSD/La Jolla
Oct 21, 2008
#17
  • Oct 21, 2008
  • #17
98COBRA281 said:
dang good price, i searched all over, and the cheapest i found was $190.00, and i couldnt find any used ones........
Click to expand...
I used a "cheater" craigslist search that lists every town and found a new set out of Yuma, AZ which is like 3hrs by car from here. She just listed them as 4.6 springs with the part number, was selling them for her husband. i'm sure she had no idea what they were. Ahh the days back when this was a budget build
 

Mattstang04

15 Year Member
Sep 15, 2006
1,152
144
104
St. Louis, MO
Oct 21, 2008
#18
  • Oct 21, 2008
  • #18
I would love to get a gas saver dd but I love driving this car too much. I was really hoping to just get a nice 20 rwhp bump without the downtime of ripping the heads off. The car get slightly under 26 mpg (apprx 25.8 mpg) if I play nice with it. I figured if I can pull this off and still maintain 22mpg I'd be cool. If the heads have to come off then I may as well get them reworked or maybe replaced all together and thats going steeper than I really want to go right now. Anybody heard anything about the Comp XE262?
 

CobraRed_96_GT

Active Member
May 20, 2006
1,421
4
39
UCSD/La Jolla
Oct 21, 2008
#19
  • Oct 21, 2008
  • #19
Get LT headers then, wont hurt gas mileage at all - if not help it. XE262ah's aren't bad. Some good mid-range power for sure, they are a bit more noisy in the engine bay though from my experience.
 

Mattstang04

15 Year Member
Sep 15, 2006
1,152
144
104
St. Louis, MO
Oct 21, 2008
#20
  • Oct 21, 2008
  • #20
Headers are another avenue I was considering. But I was going to get the bassani midlengths to go with my xpipe. Sorry about the :OT:. I know shorties dont give the bang for the buck but long tubes would require hackin up my midpipe and a complicated install. So midlengths would be a good compromise I think.
 
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
1 of 3 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

A
2001 Mustang GT, scorched metal smell and noise from trans/diff?
  • AndyE2255
  • Dec 1, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
422
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Dec 28, 2025
gkomo
Which one of these 3 intakes make the most sense for my 331 combo
  • from6to8
  • Jul 25, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
7
Views
2K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jul 26, 2024
AeroCoupe
Fox Build ideas for the 'Hudson Heap' (87 GT)
  • MadSquirrelTech
  • Sep 19, 2023
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 27, 2023
MadSquirrelTech
SN Mustang Magnum T56 swap
  • revhead347
  • May 24, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
15
Views
6K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Sunday at 3:20 PM
GearHeadGuy
Seemingly random 'will it fit' and 'how well does it work' kinds of questions...
  • JasonRP
  • Jul 3, 2021
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
19
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 14, 2021
2000xp8
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?