stock 2 valve engines are garbage! carnage!!

jasonh_86 · Dec 24, 2005

Sorry to hear about your motor man, I bet it'll run good once you get all that new stuff in and get a dyno tune tho

y2k02 · Dec 24, 2005

This should be your lesson learned. Never push it until you know the tune is right. Now you will be able to make 500+ hp. You should also invest in a wideband o2. That way you will allways know where your a/f is. Good luck with the new build.

stangGT97 · Dec 25, 2005

sucks man... from what ive heard, turbos are hard enough to dyno tune, and trying to use a mail order tune is just asking for trouble. a while back someone said they had their turbo setup dyno tuned perfectly, but once they hit the streets their A/F ratios went all over the place, hence why you need a handheld tuner to make adjustments on the street.

OinkAodeOink · Dec 25, 2005

re read my original post.. I ran the car the way it was, because I was confident in the MODULAR DEPOT tune.. Aperently the tune was WAY off, and extremely lean. I am positive it was not a mechanical failure on my part.

Crappy thing is, I wouldnt trust anyone local to tune it, so that means finding a trailer and bringing the car up to Modular Powerhouse ( same folks I'm buying the shortblock from) and have Tim, or who ever is in charge of tuning, to street tune the car, if possible.. That's the only true way to tune this car, from what I've gathered. Should be a tad cheaper now that I have the X cal programmer, and just need dyno time.

The car with this turbo setup had massive torque down low, as it started to hit boost at 1800-2k rpm.

Gearbanger 101 · Dec 25, 2005

No need to get a trailer, just keep your foot out of the oil pan until you have it tuned up. Boost it the killer, so as long as you stay out of it in the mean time, you'll be fine.

TrueBlue03 · Dec 25, 2005

Holy F**k you have a good looking car.

2000 blown conv · Dec 25, 2005

DBMSTNG said:
because i know what the hell i'm talking about. i ran 9psi on my stock block just fine and i beat the hell out of it. go to modularpowerhouse and see how many cars are running 380-420rwhp with the stock bottom end. some for 20-30k miles. if you stay within the power limits of the stock internals and have a good tune, it's not a problem. everyone knows the limits of the stock shortblock, if he exceeded that, that's HIS MISTAKE. if he drove it any way other than babying it before checking the a/f ratio guess what, IT'S HIS MISTAKE.

I agree,I've been running 455rwhp (dyno'd) with a good tune on the street and 482rwhp on 110 octane with aftercooler at the track with a stock bottom end for 1 1/2 years now. I do realize and expect that the motor WILL fail running this kind of power. I am shocked about how long this thing has held together running consistant low 11's at the track being hammared on.

tomustang · Dec 25, 2005

OinkAodeOink said:
re read my original post.. I ran the car the way it was, because I was confident in the MODULAR DEPOT tune.. Aperently the tune was WAY off, and extremely lean. I am positive it was not a mechanical failure on my part.

call mod depot and see what they have to say..

xseler8 · Dec 25, 2005

Great looking Stang. Good luck with your next set-up.
There are no mistakes in life,everything is a learning experience.Enjoy your car.

stock 2 valve engines are garbage! carnage!!

jasonh_86

I

y2k02

Member

stangGT97

New Member

OinkAodeOink

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash

TrueBlue03

Member

2000 blown conv

New Member

tomustang

Psychotic Member

xseler8

Member

Similar threads

stock 2 valve engines are garbage! carnage!!

I

Member

New Member

Straight Outta Locash

Member

New Member

Psychotic Member

Member

Similar threads

Privacy & Transparency

Privacy & Transparency