• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

stock balancer go bad?

  • Thread starter Thread starter woodyy24
  • Start date Start date May 24, 2006

woodyy24

New Member
Mar 30, 2005
290
0
0
illinois
May 24, 2006
#1
  • May 24, 2006
  • #1
i can hear a ticking/ knocking noise its in the front and appears to be coming from the balancer, it looks like its wobbling while its running but the pulley stays nice and straight. could the weight on the balancer be making the noise? i looked all around it and it looks like the ring between the weight and where the pulley mounts is messed up in a few spots.

edit: all the bolts are tight on the pulley
 

jrichker

StangNet's favorite TOOL
In Remembrance. Thank you for your contributions
Mar 10, 2000
27,512
2,813
234
Dublin GA
May 24, 2006
#2
  • May 24, 2006
  • #2
The 5.0 balancers frequently fail and cause problems. A parts store replacment unit is $50-$75, a high performance balancer will be an easy $250-$300. The high performance units are for engines that spend large amounts of time above 4500 RPM or are wound up beyond that on a regular basis.
 

fordman54935

Member
Jan 10, 2003
301
0
16
Wisconsin
May 24, 2006
#3
  • May 24, 2006
  • #3
The balancer can be wobbling yet the crank pulley will still run true because the pulley is bolted to the center hub of the harmonic balancer, and the balancer weight itself is held to the center hub with a rubber ring, so they are prone to letting go with time/mileage. The balancer could make all sorts of noise if it is rubbing against the timing chain cover, oil pan or timing pointer.
 

woodyy24

New Member
Mar 30, 2005
290
0
0
illinois
May 24, 2006
#4
  • May 24, 2006
  • #4
thanks, looks like i need a new balancer.
 

woodyy24

New Member
Mar 30, 2005
290
0
0
illinois
May 24, 2006
#5
  • May 24, 2006
  • #5
any recomendations on good replacement?
 

Skoobie

Damn...Tyler65's hot!
May 25, 2003
655
0
17
Vancouver, WA
May 24, 2006
#6
  • May 24, 2006
  • #6
I went with a parts store replacement and did it on the street. Took a few hours but its not too hard, just get a puller. 2 years later of spirited driving and no problems yet.
 

HISSIN50

"How long does it take to get help in here?
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
31,179
33
129
May 24, 2006
#7
  • May 24, 2006
  • #7
When doing a decent amount of research some time way back (I hadnt seen Jrichker's endorsement of Dorman and other such brands yet), I narrowed it down to the PP street unit (80 bucks) or the non SFI Pioneer (3021 IIRC), also in the same price range.

The Pioneer SFI units can be had for about double the prices above and should work well. Romacs, at over 200 beans, do well with regular 1320 guys.

One note - if lookin on ebay, etc for a balancer, pay attention to if you need a shim and cost of said shim - some shims are 15-20 bucks and can make a great deal on a balancer feel not so great.

Good luck.
 

fordman54935

Member
Jan 10, 2003
301
0
16
Wisconsin
May 25, 2006
#8
  • May 25, 2006
  • #8
I replaced mine with a Ford replacement (non-SFI) from Summit. You could rent a puller from a chain auto parts store but they are only like 10 or 15 dollars if you choose to buy one.
 

Modular2v

Founding Member
Jun 30, 2002
3,222
23
99
oklahoma
May 25, 2006
#9
  • May 25, 2006
  • #9
if you have a puller it should only take you 10 -15 minutes to install
 

HISSIN50

"How long does it take to get help in here?
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
31,179
33
129
May 25, 2006
#10
  • May 25, 2006
  • #10
When doing the R/R, I recommend the install and removal tool (in one kit). I'm hinky with using the crank bolt to draw the new balancer on. The kit was about 80 bucks to have 'loaned' to me.

Good luck.
 

2000xp8

SN Certified Technician
Aug 8, 2003
8,016
1,613
194
NJ
May 25, 2006
#11
  • May 25, 2006
  • #11
I wouldn't use anything from a chain store, and definetely not a Professional products (unless you want your timing to be messed up).

Just get the Ford Racing stock replacement, it's only $85, it would silly not to.
 
9

90lxfoxbody

Member
Jan 11, 2006
264
0
16
May 25, 2006
#12
  • May 25, 2006
  • #12
i got a puller from harbor freight dirt cehap and it has already proven worth its weight in gold. i replaced mine with an auto zone balancer and after two years of daily driving it still works just fine. if i ever go to a more radical setup i will change it out for favor of a more performance oriented one.
 
T

TheUser

Active Member
Jul 25, 2003
1,859
1
36
Springfield, MO
Jun 25, 2006
#13
  • Jun 25, 2006
  • #13


I'm not sure how well the above pic will show the damage, but my rubber ring is all cracked and sticks out more from the balancer in some places than other. I don't know if the weight has "spun," though. The balancer did wobble before pulling the motor, so maybe it's time to replace?

After checking on ebay, I found a Steel balancer SFI approved for like $60. There was another one (see link below) for like $100 shipped and it has fluid in it. Anyone recommend that? It's not a race motor and probably won't spend much time above 4500rpm, but if I can get a good balancer for $100, I won't mind spending the extra $20-40.
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/85-93-50-OZ-Fluid-Damper-Ford-5-0-Mustang-COBRA-TMD_W0QQcmdZViewItemQQcategoryZ33616QQihZ019QQitemZ8060745536
 

woodyy24

New Member
Mar 30, 2005
290
0
0
illinois
Jun 25, 2006
#14
  • Jun 25, 2006
  • #14
i went and got a new one from advance auto. heres a pic of the old one, the front actually had a piece of the rubber missing!! i checked the timing before and after i changed it out... it was off 3*!!



edit: i have the same phone as you. lol
 

Attachments

  • 000_1250.webp
    23.6 KB · Views: 149
T

TheUser

Active Member
Jul 25, 2003
1,859
1
36
Springfield, MO
Jun 25, 2006
#15
  • Jun 25, 2006
  • #15
I've decided on the the one from ebay, but the only issue I've ran into is the diameter. The ebay says:

This balancer fits all 82-95 302 and FORD 5.0HO Mustangs 50oz Imb. (Bidder is responsible for researching fitment)

NEW SFI 18.1 Approved (Fits 302 HO Ford 82-95) Fluid Damper. 6.625" Dia. This damper is manufactured from forged 1025 steel housing and filled with high viscosity silicone fluid.


Well, I found the diameter of my balancer by taking the circumference/pi (20.25/pi)and got 6.4457 so the diameter of my balancer is 6.4457, so that one is too big. What's up with that? The reason I found the diamter that way instead of measuring across is because it's more accurate opposed to "eye-balling" it w/ a ruler.
 

HISSIN50

"How long does it take to get help in here?
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
31,179
33
129
Jun 25, 2006
#16
  • Jun 25, 2006
  • #16
James, personally I wouldnt touch a fluid filled damper for your machine.

Also check brands with that ebay stuff - I'd rather have a non-SFI Pioneer (3021, IIRC) for 100 bucks than some generic SFI unit.

Good luck bud.
 
T

TheUser

Active Member
Jul 25, 2003
1,859
1
36
Springfield, MO
Jun 25, 2006
#17
  • Jun 25, 2006
  • #17
Thanks for bringing me back to reality HISSIN. I got caught up in the SFI approved thing. I think I'll just stick to an autozone one. I'll save the expensive stuff for later.
 

HISSIN50

"How long does it take to get help in here?
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
31,179
33
129
Jun 25, 2006
#18
  • Jun 25, 2006
  • #18
I thought the exact same thing you did. After doing a lot of research, I came to the conclusion that SFI doesnt necessarily mean a whole lot. I had thought it had to be some great quality and what-not to qualify as SFI approved. Not so.

I'd choose brand over SFI status.

EDIT: I do recall folks getting SFI Pioneers for 150ish - not a bad deal IMHO at all.
 
T

TheUser

Active Member
Jul 25, 2003
1,859
1
36
Springfield, MO
Jun 25, 2006
#19
  • Jun 25, 2006
  • #19
lol, after some more searching, I think I'll go w/ the Ford Racing balancer for like $70 from summit.

Another crazy question: should I go w/ an ARP balancer bolt? What exactly is the reasoning for an ARP bolt? I know they're stronger, so I guess it's just so it doesn't break? I wanna try to do things right this time, but I'm trying to stick to a budget

From what I understand from some google searching, SFI-Approved just means they're approved by a safety group to fit properly and have 4 bolts for the pulley. One racing group says if you don't have an SFI approved balancer, you must have a shield around your balancer, I guess so if it were to come loose. Neat
 

HISSIN50

"How long does it take to get help in here?
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
31,179
33
129
Jun 25, 2006
#20
  • Jun 25, 2006
  • #20
Exactly. Way back when, for some reason I thought that the SFI factor might mean the balancer was not as likely to slip. I think the outer ring is just captured though (no one quote me on that, as it's my conjecture).

Never tried an ARP crank bolt, so I'm not sure. But I'll give it a bump.

Good luck bud.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

U
8 Years of Vibration leading to engine knock?
  • UpgradeXP
  • Apr 14, 2025
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
436
SN95 V6 Mustang Tech Apr 14, 2025
Noobz347
J
2004 Mustang 3.8L V6 vibrations above 65 MPH and differential leaks
  • joeybuddy96
  • Mar 16, 2026
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
Replies
15
Views
463
SN95 V6 Mustang Tech Jun 28, 2026
joeybuddy96
J
S
Drivetrain 8.8 Pinion and 302 rear main seal leaks after replacing. 93 5.0 with t-5
  • Steigy4827
  • Jun 23, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
10
Views
629
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Apr 1, 2026
Steigy4827
S
Resolved Tapping sound on passenger side of engine
  • sav22rem22
  • Jun 21, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
22
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Sep 22, 2024
sav22rem22
0
V6 to V8 Swap info
  • 02_2v_Curtis
  • Jan 11, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
646
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jan 11, 2026
02_2v_Curtis
0
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?