• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Stock Gear Ratio 1987-1993 GT

  • Thread starter Thread starter 1988_Mustang_GT
  • Start date Start date Jun 21, 2004
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

Blown88GT

Founding Member
Nov 13, 1999
2,283
524
164
Palm Beach Gardens, FL
May 20, 2020
#21
  • May 20, 2020
  • #21
Noobz347 said:
...

Now, just about any steeper gear change will make 1st gear nearly useless
Click to expand...
That's the primary reason I got a new transmission. Old 1st gear was 3.55, new 1st gear is 2.95.
 
J

junkyardwarrior

Well-Known Member
Jan 10, 2011
400
113
63
May 20, 2020
#22
  • May 20, 2020
  • #22
2.73 3.08 and 3.27 were the only options. 2.73 and 3.08 were most common. Not many 3.27's. Now keep in mind these cars are 25+ years old, so that's a lot of time for people to mod them and/or repair them with different parts. I've seen them with 4.88's in junkyard. I've seen them with OE 2.73 and everything between. Found a '91 GT once in a yard, got excited (was looking for fuel lines from tank to engine for a v8 swap), got over there and popped the hood. 2.3. Somebody went thru the trouble of swapping a 2.3 into a GT for some reason. You never really know unless it's documented and that fact alone will continue to get "worse" as time goes on.

Mine had 2.73 (AOD), and it was OEM, never touched, bone stock 92 GT right down to the factory silencer, coil cover, spark plug wire cover and wiper motor cover. It now has 3.73. 2.73 with a 225hp 5.0 makes the car feel like it's 5,000 lbs. With the AOD, 3.73 makes it feel like it's 3500 lbs. 4.10? 3,000 lbs. Still a turd by today's standards but much better. I stuck with the 3.73 because it's a compromise between the 4.10's acceleration and the 3.55 highway manners. With 3.73 and the rest of the car bone stock it knocked out 24 mpg on a road trip which I found to be outstanding all things considering. My old car (5.0 85 GT 5 speed) had 4.10 and honestly it was a little too much. First gear was useless. Let the clutch out, you're pulling into 2nd almost immediately. Other car is a 93 coupe with a 2.3 and OEM 2.3L 5 speed transmission. 3.45 rear. First is almost useless like a 4.10 and stock V8/T5. I have a 3.35 T5 to go in at some point, but I'll have to change the rear gear to compensate for the higher OD and first gear, then have to get used to having to throttle it to take off from a stop in first. Right now I don't have to touch the throttle to accelerate from a stop, just let the clutch out, like a diesel. Once moving, yeah start giving it some gas to make a little speed and with it being a 2.3, very little speed at that.
 

KRUISR

10 Year Member
Apr 16, 2015
1,822
929
143
May 22, 2020
#23
  • May 22, 2020
  • #23
junkyardwarrior said:
Somebody went thru the trouble of swapping a 2.3 into a GT for some reason.
Click to expand...
Actually, probably someone put a GT body kit on a 4 cyl. I have seen a few of those for sale over the years.
 
F

FoxChasis

20+ Year Stangneter
Dec 23, 2003
589
276
93
May 25, 2020
#24
  • May 25, 2020
  • #24
junkyardwarrior said:
2.73 3.08 and 3.27 were the only options. 2.73 and 3.08 were most common. Not many 3.27's.
Click to expand...
3.27 was more common than you think
 

KRUISR

10 Year Member
Apr 16, 2015
1,822
929
143
May 26, 2020
#25
  • May 26, 2020
  • #25
Getting back to someones comment that 3.73s are not high speed... If you are in 4th gear with 3.73s you can do 115 mph at 5500 RPM. How much more do you want on the street. If more, shift to 5th and then you can get 140 mph at 5000 RPM. You will have aero drag resistance before then so likely will not actually see that speed. But where will you find a nice enough, long enough piece of road to do this?
 
J

JJP92GThatch48K

Member
Apr 12, 2021
9
6
13
Pickerington, Ohio
Apr 13, 2021
#26
  • Apr 13, 2021
  • #26
FoxChasis said:
3.27 was more common than you think
Click to expand...
The '92 GT I just bought, the previous owner put in 3.73's and I have the
original ring & pinion gears. They calculate to 3.27's. This is an automatic,
which I think would be more common to see the 3.27's in!
 
F

FoxChasis

20+ Year Stangneter
Dec 23, 2003
589
276
93
Apr 14, 2021
#27
  • Apr 14, 2021
  • #27
The 3.27:1 locking rear (door tag code "E") was...
standard in 1984-86 with AOD
optional in 1984 with T-5
optional in 1987-1993 with AOD
 
Last edited: Apr 14, 2021
Reactions: General karthief
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Drivetrain 5th Gear Ratio
  • PonyGTrider
  • Dec 8, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
33
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Dec 31, 2025
Qtrhrse23
Q
B
For Sale 1993 Mustang SVT Cobra - Black - 5 Speed - 88k Miles - Single Owner
  • Buddy Jake
  • Jun 16, 2026
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
1
Views
250
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Jun 20, 2026
Habu135
S
Looking for a high-res photo or scan of Rotunda EEC-IV Overlay #17 or #23
  • Smokinjoe 33
  • Jul 4, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
178
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 21, 2026
Praetorious
P
M
4.10 gears = 200,000 miles ?
  • michaelleewebb
  • Apr 1, 2026
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
Replies
5
Views
220
SN95 V6 Mustang Tech Apr 2, 2026
michaelleewebb
M
T
Newbie looking for some info on speedo gears
  • TDM389
  • Nov 15, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
247
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Nov 16, 2025
TDM389
T
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?