• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Stock Intake

  • Thread starter Thread starter Holik95
  • Start date Start date Aug 31, 2005
H

Holik95

New Member
Aug 14, 2005
90
0
0
Granite City,IL
Aug 31, 2005
#1
  • Aug 31, 2005
  • #1
I have a 95 Mustang GT 5.0 5 speed.I am getting ready to put on a set of AFR 165 Heads ,E-303 cam, and Scorpion 1.6 RR.I dont have the money to get the intake manifold right now.So i was wondering how much will the stock intake hurt my performance
 

S/CBlack95GT

New Member
Apr 6, 2003
2,018
0
0
Tampa Palms, FL
Aug 31, 2005
#2
  • Aug 31, 2005
  • #2
It will kill it, but if you dont have the money you dont have the money.
 

Zero Signal

Active Member
Feb 24, 2003
2,633
2
46
Tucson, AZ
Aug 31, 2005
#3
  • Aug 31, 2005
  • #3
Yeah you might be dissapointed when you get it running after spending so much. The stock intake will drag the whole system down. I'd say at the very least try to find an explorer intake. Check your statewide auto recyclers association and don't pay more than $150 for it.
 
H

Holik95

New Member
Aug 14, 2005
90
0
0
Granite City,IL
Aug 31, 2005
#4
  • Aug 31, 2005
  • #4
What intake would be the best for my heads and cam?
 

tmoss

Gettin Wired
Founding Member
Jun 28, 2001
7,153
32
128
Saint Louis, MO
Sep 1, 2005
#5
  • Sep 1, 2005
  • #5
An Explorer is a good choice. The lower needs to be ported to get the full potential from the AFR heads, but you don't have the money - so get the intake and run it as-is now and port the lower later. You can find a used Performer also, but it will cost more than the Explorer unless you get lucky.
 
F

fiveo'cobra

New Member
Oct 7, 2004
241
0
0
SC
Sep 1, 2005
#6
  • Sep 1, 2005
  • #6
Just wait a couple weeks or so till your next paycheck and buy something nice like a trickflow track heat or a holley systemax. No need to hurry and get something just to get it.
 

mo_dingo

20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 26, 2003
3,031
2
58
Tucson, AZ
Sep 1, 2005
#7
  • Sep 1, 2005
  • #7
Yeah, I know the boat you were in. As I was saving up money, I wanted it NOW NOW NOW....lol.

But you should just wait and buy it all at once. I know how impatient and nerve racking it can be...You will ne so much happier in the end, knowing you have a great combo.
Scott
 

JJ95GTID

Active Member
Sep 22, 2003
1,141
4
49
Phoenix, AZ
Sep 1, 2005
#8
  • Sep 1, 2005
  • #8
It won't hurt to just do the cam and heads now and wait until you can afford an intake.
The heads and cam do actually help the car perform better than stock even with the stock intake.
There is the weight savings and the roller rockers are more efficient than non roller stockers.
I totally understand being under a budget. I won't be getting an intake anytime soon. I want to get roller rockers and a X-pipe first. Then, sub frame connectors and some other suspension stuff.
So, go ahead and bolt them on and get the intake when it fits your budget.

BTW, with just my Y303s I picked up 0.4s in the 1/4 mile. I also don't have any knocking anymore. I run 16* of timing using 87 octane gas.
 
D

DavidNC

Founding Member
Sep 16, 2002
119
0
16
Sep 1, 2005
#9
  • Sep 1, 2005
  • #9
From the dyno runs I've seen, the stock 94-94 intake gives up 20 hp over the stock pre-94 EFI intake. So, you'll make up even more than that going with an explorer intake. and more with better flowing intakes. Some of the dyno studies showed actually loosing hp if going too big on intake/head combinations.
 
H

homerojr

New Member
Dec 2, 2002
74
0
0
Sep 1, 2005
#10
  • Sep 1, 2005
  • #10
I bought the AFR165 too, and as I would do some port work on the heads (along with my cobra intake - gasket match, intake ports match, etc), and it´ll take a while, now I´m using temporarily my stock intake. Considering my previous upgrade (see my sig), man, do this intake have low down torque!! However, it simply dies at 5000... It shoud be worse if you use AFR165, E cam and stock intake. My point is you´ll definetely lose power up there, but will have some fun at low end (and you could enjoy your car while waiting for an upgrade!)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

S
Holley High-ram tuning settings
  • spencergt66
  • Apr 1, 2026
  • Digital Self-tuning Forum
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
393
Digital Self-tuning Forum May 12, 2026
spencergt66
S
E
4.6l auto to 5.4l 6 speed
  • EastanF5
  • Jan 22, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
0
Views
159
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Jan 22, 2026
EastanF5
E
A
Discussion on mild budget build/ top end
  • Acesario
  • Feb 21, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
644
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 23, 2026
General karthief
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
670
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 28, 2026
Noobz347
9
Does anyone else have a combo close to this
  • 90Stanger302
  • Dec 10, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
232
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 25, 2025
Qtrhrse23
Q
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?