• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Stock Stang___H/C/I or Vortech ???

  • Thread starter Thread starter final5-0
  • Start date Start date Apr 28, 2006

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Apr 28, 2006
#1
  • Apr 28, 2006
  • #1
This Q has been asked before and in the past, my first thoughts would have been NA

For some time now, I've been having different thoughts

I crunched some data Donavan (94-95 forum member HGFireHazard) was kind enough to send me of his recent pull

You can see the thread about the pull and detalils elsewhere in this fourm.

I think the little comparo chart of Donavan & Yours Truly I threw together gives some insight to the Q here



Grady
 

The Green GT

No 13 year olds are safe around me.
10 Year Member
Jan 8, 2006
1,269
19
99
Louisiana
Apr 28, 2006
#2
  • Apr 28, 2006
  • #2
Well looks like I need to get a Vortech.
 
B

bimmertech

New Member
May 3, 2005
1,123
0
0
merriam, ks
Apr 28, 2006
#3
  • Apr 28, 2006
  • #3
vortech with some gt40's. no need to spend the big bucks to split the block better.
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Apr 28, 2006
#4
  • Apr 28, 2006
  • #4
bimmertech said:
vortech with some gt40's. no need to spend the big bucks to split the block better.
Click to expand...

Sooooooooooo Ben

Do you think this kinda helps to show the big picture we have been talking about recently?

I relate to a chart or hard data of some kind much better myself

I agree about not having to spend or do a whole lot about uping the flow enough to make a very impressive street combo

Grady
 
B

bimmertech

New Member
May 3, 2005
1,123
0
0
merriam, ks
Apr 28, 2006
#5
  • Apr 28, 2006
  • #5
the torque curve is the deal breaker.

that translates to happy times for me.

sure a kb can do better, but ohhhh the heat.

just curious if JR has a dyno chart of his turbo. pretty sure he has a stock gt longblock.
 

94gts

Member
Jul 4, 2004
873
0
16
Carmel, New York
Apr 28, 2006
#6
  • Apr 28, 2006
  • #6
bimmertech said:
just curious if JR has a dyno chart of his turbo. pretty sure he has a stock gt longblock.
Click to expand...

i bet it would romp them all
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Apr 28, 2006
#7
  • Apr 28, 2006
  • #7
bimmertech said:
the torque curve is the deal breaker.

that translates to happy times for me.

sure a kb can do better, but ohhhh the heat.

just curious if JR has a dyno chart of his turbo. pretty sure he has a stock gt longblock.
Click to expand...

Torque does look good don't it

I was gonna include a kb combo I got some data on
but
It had AFR's, FTI cam, Edel intake

Not really all that fair to include that combo as its not an apples to apples comparison to Donavan's combo

I guess we could look at JR's pull as well IF we can get the numerical values from it

Grady
 

BlackVert

15 Year Member
Oct 3, 2003
5,589
9
98
Bethesda, MD
Apr 28, 2006
#8
  • Apr 28, 2006
  • #8
final5-0 said:
Torque does look good don't it

I was gonna include a kb combo I got some data on
but
It had AFR's, FTI cam, Edel intake

Not really all that fair to include that combo as its not an apples to apples comparison to Donavan's combo

I guess we could look at JR's pull as well IF we can get the numerical values from it

Grady
Click to expand...
i wish i had a dyno to share because i have jr's old k/b and a stock longblock (but the e7 heads are ported) and a stock cam.

bimmertech, believe me i know what you mean about the heat ... i have logged act temps in the 230s after a 1/2 hour of normal driving. i really need to finish my water injection project.

i think this summer i will have my act together enough to do some dyno runs.
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Apr 28, 2006
#9
  • Apr 28, 2006
  • #9
BlackVert said:
i have logged act temps in the 230s after a 1/2 hour of normal driving.

i think this summer i will have my act together enough to do some dyno runs.
Click to expand...
Chris made a punny funny

Grady
 

BlackVert

15 Year Member
Oct 3, 2003
5,589
9
98
Bethesda, MD
Apr 28, 2006
#10
  • Apr 28, 2006
  • #10
hehe ... i didn't notice that!

- chris
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Apr 28, 2006
#11
  • Apr 28, 2006
  • #11
I fixed your name

When I saw your email notify hit my pc

I said to myself

His name is Chris

Sorry bout that

Grady
 

Zero Signal

Active Member
Feb 24, 2003
2,633
2
46
Tucson, AZ
Apr 29, 2006
#12
  • Apr 29, 2006
  • #12
I think anyone wanting to go with boost should at the least pickup some GT-40 irons just for the sake of having a more stout head. I'm so done with the H/C/I stuff I can't wait to get some boost goin in the next couple years.
 

Blackened302

Active Member
Jul 21, 2005
1,439
0
36
South TX
Apr 29, 2006
#13
  • Apr 29, 2006
  • #13
bimmertech said:
vortech with some gt40's. no need to spend the big bucks to split the block better.
Click to expand...
i agree! i was gonna slap a turbo on w/ my stock h/c/i, but my gf's bro-in-law is giving me the gt40 stuff--it's gonna make anything even better.
 

quickstang_1994

Member
Oct 12, 2005
43
0
6
South Carolina
Apr 29, 2006
#14
  • Apr 29, 2006
  • #14
Get the Vortech first. If you still want more, add a intake or add it when you do the vortech and change injectors. When you blow gaskets then replace the heads but I would leave the cam alone. Just my 2 cent.
 

YEAHLOH95

Founding Member
Nov 19, 2001
1,249
3
39
EVERETT,PA
Apr 29, 2006
#15
  • Apr 29, 2006
  • #15
i have always wondered what my car would run like without the blower?? i did everything all at once.
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Apr 29, 2006
#16
  • Apr 29, 2006
  • #16
The hp difference would not be as great in the comparo for other similar combos due to they have upgraded tb, maf, catback, and usually don't run a catted mid pipe.

But still

Even though they might get closer or match the hp curve

They ain't gonna match Donavan's tq curve

I got a Q here!

If there was a bit of belt slip as some members suspect, I am thinking it would be hurting the most at say mid to redline rpm.

All you Vortech guys ... Would you agree?

Grady
 

gmkillr

Founding Member
Jul 13, 2002
606
1
18
Apr 29, 2006
#17
  • Apr 29, 2006
  • #17
final5-0 said:
I got a Q here!
If there was a bit of belt slip as some members suspect, I am thinking it would be hurting the most at say mid to redline rpm.
All you Vortech guys ... Would you agree?
Grady
Click to expand...

Yes, I would agree w/ that statement, probably mostly in the upper rpm's.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

J
Progress Thread Family member 1989 GT- Backstory and updates
  • JRC99
  • Apr 19, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 26, 2025
JRC99
J
Old H/c/i Installation Explanation And Pics
  • FastDriver
  • Jan 26, 2018
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
5
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 27, 2018
FastDriver
Supercharged 1994 3.8
  • Christian Cornwell
  • Dec 12, 2016
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
37
Views
9K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 16, 2017
Michael Gordon
M
T
Fox No Boost And Stumped
  • TWEECD
  • Aug 12, 2017
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3 4
Replies
63
Views
13K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 31, 2017
TWEECD
T
S
Fresh .020 Over Shortblock And H/c/i, Inj, Maf Wont Stay Running
  • Scurvilicous
  • Apr 4, 2016
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
14
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Apr 5, 2016
Scurvilicous
S
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?