• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech

straight six swap

  • Thread starter Thread starter Shivan
  • Start date Start date Jun 11, 2005
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
S

Shivan

New Member
Apr 3, 2005
27
0
0
Heartland
Jun 11, 2005
#1
  • Jun 11, 2005
  • #1
my question is simple and very crazy i suppose

but im gonna ask it anywayz, dont get to upset

my unlce has an inline 6cyl. out of a 66 bronco
2 engine mounts, anyone heard of a straight six like that bolting into the 85 mustang lx body
i havent gone up to measure it out yet but he thinks it would fit
very simple engine, not computer controlled
any doubts that it wouldnt work.
105 hp 170 C.I. six cylinder
 

freakintiger

New Member
Apr 8, 2004
310
0
0
Virginia Beach, VA :TAX CAPITAL OF THE WORLD!
Jun 11, 2005
#2
  • Jun 11, 2005
  • #2
I'm not 100% sure but I thought some of the early fox mustangs could be had ith an inline six(?).
You should do it if at all possible, there is a lot of performance equipment(old school)available for the old inline 6 engines. Four barrel manifolds, headers, cams, etc.. You should also take the time to port your cylinder head, maybe even go up to bigger valves.
I'm a big fan of different and I have considered this swap before, think "rat-rod" 'stang!
 

Shawneebear93

20+ Year Stangneter
May 4, 2004
518
17
49
Salisbury Twp, Allentown, PA
Jun 12, 2005
#3
  • Jun 12, 2005
  • #3
Inline sixes were available until I believe 1985 in the Mustang. Ask Willy0314, he has a 2.8L ... but now that I'm thinking his might be a V-6, not an I-6. Anyways, sixes were available so it would probably fit, just might need some custom work.
 

Red_LX

I’m not much help unless you’re looking for ****!
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,896
73
129
Morgantown, WV...where couches meet their doom
Jun 12, 2005
#4
  • Jun 12, 2005
  • #4
I don't think I'd go to all the trouble for 105 hp, but that's just me. I know you can mod them, but I think it'd still be lackluster performance.
 
S

Shivan

New Member
Apr 3, 2005
27
0
0
Heartland
Jun 12, 2005
#5
  • Jun 12, 2005
  • #5
awesome, right now the 2.3 in my car has some issues

it's going to be a fall project for when i switch back to the 4 wheel drive truck for winter

thanks guys, now i will certainly go measure up what i can
 
1

140CILX-Coupe

New Member
Mar 30, 2005
189
1
0
Jun 12, 2005
#6
  • Jun 12, 2005
  • #6
I thought the I6 was a 3.3? and th v6 was a 2.8 and then the newer v6s in the SN's are 3.8?

 

4000 Pounds of Iron

Founding Member
Nov 6, 1999
473
0
0
Nashville, TN
Jun 12, 2005
#7
  • Jun 12, 2005
  • #7
I-6 swaps in the Fox chassis require the specific I6 K-member, and therefore a lot of work.

4k#Fe
 

Shawneebear93

20+ Year Stangneter
May 4, 2004
518
17
49
Salisbury Twp, Allentown, PA
Jun 12, 2005
#8
  • Jun 12, 2005
  • #8
140CILX-Coupe said:
I thought the I6 was a 3.3? and th v6 was a 2.8 and then the newer v6s in the SN's are 3.8?

Click to expand...
I think you're right.
 
1

140CILX-Coupe

New Member
Mar 30, 2005
189
1
0
Jun 12, 2005
#9
  • Jun 12, 2005
  • #9
Unless you got ahold of the V6 in the old ass capri's, then thats not worth the time to swap in anything...

oversized paperweight is exactly what it is.
 
S

Shivan

New Member
Apr 3, 2005
27
0
0
Heartland
Jun 12, 2005
#10
  • Jun 12, 2005
  • #10
I-6 swaps in the Fox chassis require the specific I6 K-member, and therefore a lot of work.

4k#Fe


could you explain a little better for me plz
 

4000 Pounds of Iron

Founding Member
Nov 6, 1999
473
0
0
Nashville, TN
Jun 12, 2005
#11
  • Jun 12, 2005
  • #11
The K-member is the gigantic piece of stamped steel that holds up the engine and front suspension and attaches to the body. Removing it requires removing the engine and disassembling the front suspension and steering, and possibly removing the fenders, I can't remember.

4k#Fe
 

Anlushac11

Founding Member
Feb 17, 2001
2,270
0
0
Indianapolis, Indiana
Jun 12, 2005
#12
  • Jun 12, 2005
  • #12
I have a 80 Mustang I6 and a 81 Mustang T-top coupe w/ I6.

It does require a I6 K-member. The motor mounts are way forward and the K-Member is a bit deeper.

The I6 was offered in 79 1/2 to 82 Mustang's. There are 4 speed I6 cars but most are C4 auto's and the last group, IIRC 82's also had C3 auto's.

The Cologne 2.8L V6 was ued in the Capri II which were selling so well that engine supplies of the V6 dried up for the US so Ford USA had to improvise and use the 3.3L 200cid I6.

The I6 can be made to make pretty decent power and has a nice following. Its main advantage is lots of low end torque. Stock rating is about 95hp, 67rwhp. About same power as a stock 2.3L but with gobs more low end torque.

Common mod is headers and big exhaust, cam, and pull head and mill .060" to raise compression, bigger carb than the wimpy 1bbl.

The log head is the biggest performance inhibitor. Think of it as the I6 version of the 2.3L 's poor port design. Like the 2.3L it needs ported and polished to make good power unless you decide to go turbo.

Australia and Brazil also used a similar I6 design til the early 80's. Australian I6 heads have a removable intake whcih some have modified to hold a 4bbl. A stock non ported Aussie I6 head is a 50hp bolt on. Porting and polish adds more.

There is a aluminum Brazilian head available but it will need a custom exhaust header since the exahust ports are different. FSPP is getting ready to offer a bolt on Aluminum head for the US I6 that is designed to be a 100hp bolt on out of the box and with engine mods is designed to give 300hp normally aspirated.

You tell me if this 66 Mustang, 200 I6 is having problems making power? That is Mustang Geezers car and it is one of the hottest I6 Mustangs around.


Here is a forum dedicated to I6 Mustangs
http://fordsix.com/forum/

Here is Mustang Geezers website
http://www.geocities.com/mustang_man_1966/index.html

And Here is Ford Six Performance Parts.
http://cquesttechnologies.com/fspp/


2.3L turbo has the advantage in having forged pistoms readily available. Forged pistons for the I6 have to be ordered.
 
M

mandarinaracing

New Member
May 13, 2003
4
0
0
Jun 12, 2005
#13
  • Jun 12, 2005
  • #13
Here's a web page of a guy in Finland that has a Fox Stang with an inline six, he uses for auto x-ing...http://www.ponikorjaamo.com/ti80/index.htm

Also if you're concerned about power, this guy is running a '63 Falcon with a 250 six well into the 12's
http://www.turbomustangs.com/feature_cars/willfalcon.php

Sixes are cool, it's all about daring to be different, not the cookie cutter 302 V8 fuellie...buit then again all you 2.3 guys know that already

Alex
 
R

RustBucket

New Member
Jun 8, 2003
585
0
0
Buford, GA
Jun 12, 2005
#14
  • Jun 12, 2005
  • #14
Since I6 Mustangs are scarce, I wonder if the K-member from a Fairmont/Zephyr would fit. It too is a Fox and if all Foxes are created equal, then it should be a good match. There's plenty of I6 Fairmonts lying around so a k-member shouldn't be that hard to come by.

Just a thought.
 

Anlushac11

Founding Member
Feb 17, 2001
2,270
0
0
Indianapolis, Indiana
Jun 12, 2005
#15
  • Jun 12, 2005
  • #15
RustBucket said:
Since I6 Mustangs are scarce, I wonder if the K-member from a Fairmont/Zephyr would fit. It too is a Fox and if all Foxes are created equal, then it should be a good match. There's plenty of I6 Fairmonts lying around so a k-member shouldn't be that hard to come by.

Just a thought.
Click to expand...

Its the same.
 
S

Shivan

New Member
Apr 3, 2005
27
0
0
Heartland
Jun 12, 2005
#16
  • Jun 12, 2005
  • #16
thankyou very much Anlushac that was VERY educational

yeah, id say that looks like plenty power in the pic
 
1

140CILX-Coupe

New Member
Mar 30, 2005
189
1
0
Jun 13, 2005
#17
  • Jun 13, 2005
  • #17
I would have a custom tubular kmember made.
 

rd

Founding Member
Jan 12, 2000
3,316
63
109
Ocean Springs MS
Jun 13, 2005
#18
  • Jun 13, 2005
  • #18
Having busted my chops to put a 5.0 in a straight six car, I have the following observations:

It is best done with the straight six crossmember, and a Fairmont unit should work.

You need the six cyl. bellhousing for the trans, the bolt pattern is different than either the 4 or v8. C4 and C5's are commonly availalble.

The throttle linkage, fan shroud, etc are also 6 specific.

If you find a donor car, which should be easy, it could be simply done.

Not sure why, but I dont understand 89 Caprices with 24 in wheels, either.
 
1

140CILX-Coupe

New Member
Mar 30, 2005
189
1
0
Jun 13, 2005
#19
  • Jun 13, 2005
  • #19
yeah i dont understang the whole larger than 17in rims..

guess we will never know
 
R

RustBucket

New Member
Jun 8, 2003
585
0
0
Buford, GA
Jun 13, 2005
#20
  • Jun 13, 2005
  • #20
The bellhousing is only different if the motor is a 170 or 200 ci motor. The 250's used the SBF bellhousing.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Old H/c/i Installation Explanation And Pics
  • FastDriver
  • Jan 26, 2018
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
5
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 27, 2018
FastDriver
Need Help, Car Wont Start, I've Gone Through Both Checklists
  • 93silverlx50
  • Jul 22, 2017
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
54
Views
12K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Apr 30, 2019
General karthief
Engine Dreaded Coyote Tick Fixed!!!
  • MealeyGT12
  • May 30, 2017
  • 2010 - 2014 Specific Tech
Replies
11
Views
85K
2010 - 2014 Specific Tech Jan 21, 2021
MrGEM
What It Cost Me To Not Put An Ls In My Fox.
  • CarMichael Angelo
  • Feb 14, 2014
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
14
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 15, 2014
CarMichael Angelo
Progress Thread Tanner's "there's Probably A Name For This Illness" Builds Thread
  • tannerc91gt
  • Jun 30, 2014
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 41 42 43
Replies
843
Views
91K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 6, 2016
Davedacarpainter
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?