• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

Stroke It or Bore It??????

  • Thread starter Thread starter SFStangGT
  • Start date Start date Sep 4, 2004
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
First Prev 3 of 3

Mossberg

Active Member
Jul 21, 2003
0
1
36
ATL, Shawty
Sep 12, 2004
#41
  • Sep 12, 2004
  • #41
Kidd wishes he never spent the money on his stroker. He thought it was a waste.
 
S

super street

New Member
Jan 15, 2004
38
0
0
houston
Sep 12, 2004
#42
  • Sep 12, 2004
  • #42
white99gt said:
Guess you were not bright enough to look on my mods page and see i ran 11.60 with 481rwhp and a race wieght of 3610 on dot drag radials..
Click to expand...
no i didn't look at your mods, mainly because i don't care what mods you have. i'm not gonna get into an internet pissing contest w/you guys about a stupid ass car. maybe you should update your avatar to your new best et then. sorry for my assumption.

11.60 w/481 rwhp is pretty lame, i guess that's why now you have 6whatever at the wheels.

my car was running 11.90s on nitto drs, in 100 degree heat, at 3600# with only 393 rwhp.

i guess your car is better than mine , good luck w/king of the street.
 
S

SFStangGT

New Member
Aug 4, 2004
53
0
0
South Florida
Sep 12, 2004
#43
  • Sep 12, 2004
  • #43
Mossberg said:
Kidd wishes he never spent the money on his stroker. He thought it was a waste.
Click to expand...

First, Yeah I have read about his car. Even though it would be a beast regardless if he stroked it or not. He had a hell of a tuner and what seems like an endless supply of money I am glad to finally get my answer that a stroker is not worth the money. So I guess I'll stay with the stock stroke. What about boring??? Is it even worth it??? I guess I'll just wait for Kidd to do it, since he has done everything else, and get a review from him.
 

white99gt

Founding Member
Aug 8, 2000
4,649
1
0
stockbridge,Ga(near atlanta)
Sep 13, 2004
#44
  • Sep 13, 2004
  • #44
super street said:
no i didn't look at your mods, mainly because i don't care what mods you have. i'm not gonna get into an internet pissing contest w/you guys about a stupid ass car. maybe you should update your avatar to your new best et then. sorry for my assumption.

11.60 w/481 rwhp is pretty lame, i guess that's why now you have 6whatever at the wheels.

my car was running 11.90s on nitto drs, in 100 degree heat, at 3600# with only 393 rwhp.

i guess your car is better than mine , good luck w/king of the street.
Click to expand...

Never said my car was better or faster.I was just stating a fact,you never looked at the facts..As far as a new best dont have one..Car has not been to the track since last october..Really dont care how fast it is,its not a track car its a street car and personally dont care if my times are lame or not..

EDIT:just to add the original poster was asking about motors not who ran what with what...
 
M

MoNsTaMaCk24

Founding Member
Aug 12, 2002
742
0
0
Shippensburg, PA
Sep 13, 2004
#45
  • Sep 13, 2004
  • #45
You guys crack me up... Everyone says dont waste the money boring or stroking spend it on internals or heads and blah blah! I have a block bored out 30 over and i have all forged internals spring time it will go in. Now if your going to be naturally aspirated stroke it!!! If not dont! Simple as that! If you have the money to stroke a 4.6 you have the money for all the parts! But heads are the most important things on these 4.6! The right head and cam setup goes a long way!!! 600+ RWHP street car is bad@$$ Who cares about times when you have a dyno slip like that!!!
 

Red35th

Member
Apr 18, 2003
609
2
19
Houston, TX
Sep 13, 2004
#46
  • Sep 13, 2004
  • #46
Has anyone ever actually seen a hp increase from stroking it? I know that boreing will increase hp for the reasons stated.

I have yet to see anyone gain hp or anyone show that you gain hp from just stroking it.

I wish the VT Comp. guys would show up and answer here. But I have never heard of how much, if anything you gain from stroking.

Anyone have rock solid evidence they can yield?

Thanks.
 
S

SFStangGT

New Member
Aug 4, 2004
53
0
0
South Florida
Sep 13, 2004
#47
  • Sep 13, 2004
  • #47
Red35th said:
Has anyone ever actually seen a hp increase from stroking it? I know that boreing will increase hp for the reasons stated.

I have yet to see anyone gain hp or anyone show that you gain hp from just stroking it.

I wish the VT Comp. guys would show up and answer here. But I have never heard of how much, if anything you gain from stroking.

Anyone have rock solid evidence they can yield?

Thanks.
Click to expand...

Exactly what I want to know???? Actual proof that boring and stroking helps.......
 

Mossberg

Active Member
Jul 21, 2003
0
1
36
ATL, Shawty
Sep 14, 2004
#48
  • Sep 14, 2004
  • #48
SFStangGT said:
First, Yeah I have read about his car. Even though it would be a beast regardless if he stroked it or not. He had a hell of a tuner and what seems like an endless supply of money I am glad to finally get my answer that a stroker is not worth the money. So I guess I'll stay with the stock stroke. What about boring??? Is it even worth it??? I guess I'll just wait for Kidd to do it, since he has done everything else, and get a review from him.
Click to expand...
Now boring will get you good gains as the stock stroke is already sufficient.
 
9

99Roush

New Member
Aug 16, 2001
25
0
0
Michigan
Oct 22, 2004
#49
  • Oct 22, 2004
  • #49
Found This

Try this link.
http://forums.modulardepot.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=31577
 

VTEngine

Founding Member
Nov 4, 2002
364
0
0
Lansing, MI
Oct 22, 2004
#50
  • Oct 22, 2004
  • #50
Fastest 2V - Stroker
Fastest 4V - Stroker (with the exception of Mihovetz)

You either like them, or you don't. It's that simple.
 

VTEngine

Founding Member
Nov 4, 2002
364
0
0
Lansing, MI
Oct 22, 2004
#51
  • Oct 22, 2004
  • #51
Red35th said:
Has anyone ever actually seen a hp increase from stroking it? I know that boreing will increase hp for the reasons stated.

I have yet to see anyone gain hp or anyone show that you gain hp from just stroking it.

I wish the VT Comp. guys would show up and answer here. But I have never heard of how much, if anything you gain from stroking.

Anyone have rock solid evidence they can yield?

Thanks.
Click to expand...

With stock heads and cams, you'll gain tons of torque down low, but will loose power up top. The stock top end can't support the added stroke. BUT, we tell people to spend money on heads and cams before stroking an engine if they're staying n/a. Big bores are great too. For an n/a street car, big bores are nice, but so are strokers. All depends on your budget and application. Each person is going to require something different, whether it be strength of the parts, compression ratio's, etc.
 

6Stang7

New Member
Jun 1, 2003
1,470
0
0
Livermore, CA
Oct 22, 2004
#52
  • Oct 22, 2004
  • #52
numenor27 said:
just wondering...
doesnt a longer stroke rev slower, but give you more low end torque?
Click to expand...
Kind of. It does reduce redline, but your valve train will hit it's redline before the bottom end does usually. It will increase torque not just in the low band, but in the whole band. Stroke is basically your engine mechanical advantage.
 
9

99Roush

New Member
Aug 16, 2001
25
0
0
Michigan
Oct 22, 2004
#53
  • Oct 22, 2004
  • #53
VTEngine said:
Fastest 2V - Stroker
Fastest 4V - Stroker (with the exception of Mihovetz)
Click to expand...

I take it both of these have power adders?
 

VTEngine

Founding Member
Nov 4, 2002
364
0
0
Lansing, MI
Oct 22, 2004
#54
  • Oct 22, 2004
  • #54
99Roush said:
I take it both of these have power adders?
Click to expand...

Indeed they do.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
First Prev 3 of 3
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

5
Foxbody Intro
  • 5.0Sucio
  • May 26, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
1
Views
66
The Welcome Wagon May 26, 2026
Noobz347
9
Milton Questions, 351 swap newedge
  • 996stang
  • Jul 20, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
194
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 25, 2026
Killer351w
K
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
685
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 28, 2026
Noobz347
Need some camshaft guru advice on power loss from supercharger to nitrous
  • TTSaleen
  • Dec 1, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
18
Views
585
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 29, 2025
revhead347
S
Requesting Guidance for 306 motor swap - Fuel? - SD? MAF?
  • So_Flo
  • Jul 26, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
32
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 4, 2026
Mcmahst
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?