• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Stroke it?

  • Thread starter Thread starter plucka-plucka
  • Start date Start date Feb 4, 2004
P

plucka-plucka

New Member
Apr 1, 2003
77
0
0
California
Feb 4, 2004
#1
  • Feb 4, 2004
  • #1
I am going to need to rebuild my engine soon and I wanted to know if stroking it is a good idea. If so, to what: 306, 331, or 347. Or is it better to stay with the 302?

Also, if you stroke it, do uyou need a new computer, or will the A/F ratio be ok?
 
E

eric88gt

Founding Member
Aug 10, 2000
163
0
16
Chisholm, MN
Feb 4, 2004
#2
  • Feb 4, 2004
  • #2
Actually, a 306 would be a stock stroke and a .030 overbore. You wouldn't need a new computer, with an AFPR you could get it tuned in pretty close.
 
H

Highbredcloud

Active Member
Mar 4, 2003
1,075
1
36
Palos Hills, IL
Feb 4, 2004
#3
  • Feb 4, 2004
  • #3
eric88gt said:
Actually, a 306 would be a stock stroke and a .030 overbore. You wouldn't need a new computer, with an AFPR you could get it tuned in pretty close.
Click to expand...

so you're saying you need a new computer with a stroker kit like a 331 or a 347?
 

BlackFox5.0

Founding Member
Aug 7, 2000
3,514
1
0
Massachusetts
Feb 4, 2004
#4
  • Feb 4, 2004
  • #4
You don't need a new computer, having Mass Air should take care of most of it, but like Eric said, you should also have an AFPR.

I don't think strokers last very long, which is why I just kept my 302 which is bored to 306 becuase I had a ring ridge at the top of the clyinders. There is no power difference between a 302, and 306.
 

TIMMY2734

Founding Member
May 17, 2002
1,330
1
36
Queens, NY
Feb 5, 2004
#5
  • Feb 5, 2004
  • #5
What are your plans for the car? What kind of budget are you on? You wont need a new computer, at most youll need a chip burnt for your combo.

A properly built stroker motor should have no issues with longetivy. Granted, you wont last as long as the stock motor, but for numerous reasons. Get a high quality kit like scat or eagle and have a good guy slap it all together.

If your budget allows, go with a stroker. If you believe all the hype about the 347s burning oil and what not, get a 331. You may or may not kick yourself later on for not going with the extra cubes later on down the road.

Just my $.02
 

Rick 91GT

Mustang Master
Nov 29, 1999
9,692
95
99
PA
Feb 5, 2004
#6
  • Feb 5, 2004
  • #6
TIMMY2734 said:
What are your plans for the car? What kind of budget are you on? You wont need a new computer, at most youll need a chip burnt for your combo.

A properly built stroker motor should have no issues with longetivy. Granted, you wont last as long as the stock motor, but for numerous reasons. Get a high quality kit like scat or eagle and have a good guy slap it all together.

If your budget allows, go with a stroker. If you believe all the hype about the 347s burning oil and what not, get a 331. You may or may not kick yourself later on for not going with the extra cubes later on down the road.

Just my $.02
Click to expand...

Exactly.... Stroking does not directly effect the A/F ratio, the entire combo and tune does. With a MAF set-up the EEC will help make the car run at stoitch (perfect A/F ratio) based on feedback from various sensors. The AFPR will help if you are lean up top at WOT, that is the only time you will get the extra fuel since the O2's are out of the loop then.
 
P

plucka-plucka

New Member
Apr 1, 2003
77
0
0
California
Feb 5, 2004
#7
  • Feb 5, 2004
  • #7
Thanks all. I am trying to get a feel for all of the things I need to consider and everyones .02 is welcome. I would hate to lay down the dinero and then not like what I get. I am thinking about a blower eventually too, but I am in Cali and have to stay smog legal. I am already pushing it as it is.
 

TrophyHead

15 Year Member
Mar 18, 2003
1,195
11
49
PA
Feb 5, 2004
#8
  • Feb 5, 2004
  • #8
I've seen cars in magazines that have 347 and superchargers in Cali and they pass smog.

How many miles could you get out of a 347 with fully forged internals, *cast iron heads*, and everything else? Pushing like 14psi of boost? I'd say 100,000 easy does this sound about right or am i daydreaming?
 

TIMMY2734

Founding Member
May 17, 2002
1,330
1
36
Queens, NY
Feb 5, 2004
#9
  • Feb 5, 2004
  • #9
As long as all your parts are CARB legal, you should have no problems pasisng the sniffer. As long as you have a properly designed cam, i dont really see a problem.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

D
Early ford 302 heads
  • Dagasser
  • May 4, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
1
Views
60
The Welcome Wagon May 4, 2026
Noobz347
Engine Suggestions on an engine rebuild. Stock cam/GT40Ps or aftermarket on both for a fun weekend driver?
  • MadSquirrelTech
  • Apr 28, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
594
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 7, 2026
MadSquirrelTech
Electrical 88 EEC Injectors batch firing ?
  • Dustin 86GT
  • Dec 8, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
10
Views
383
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 8, 2026
gkomo
H
Forced Induction On3 Turbo Kit- Parts list NEEDED - 302 Stock Motor
  • Hirothecool1
  • Feb 27, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
861
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 7, 2026
slow84lx
S
P
67 Mustang, with the 302 want to convert auto back to the original manual
  • Pdunn
  • May 3, 2026
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
2
Views
92
Classic Mustang Specific Tech May 7, 2026
Mcmahst
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?