Has anyone used the fatmans or the RRS strut conversions yet. Let me know what you think, or if you have not used them let me know your thoughts in general about them.

reenmachine said:They did the Fatman conversion at KAR Auto Group a few weeks ago & when all was said & done, it works great. Problem is, there's a ton of stuff you need that Fatman doesn't mention and it comes out costing twice what you initially estimate based on the price of their kit and the list they supply of the other stuff you need. You're also going to have header fitment issues unless you're running stock exhaust manifolds.
KAR Auto Group is putting together a truly complete kit to do the conversion. Call them at 800.341.5949 for details and pricing. It'll sound expensive, but it's the same as what you would end up spending after you spent the time figuring out and then hunting down all of the random odds & ends yourself.
Overall, I was pleased with the final results, but not the process to get there.

You can call Fatman about your headers, but I'll wager that you'll have problems.txwoody said:As far as header I am running a set of JBA shorties. Do you think there will still be a problem. So with me being able to get the extra parts do you think its worth it or should I look at one of the other kits.

The answer is: it all depends. Both can be made to handle & both can be made to ride nicely. The MII in my '67 fastback has Carrera coilovers and rides & handles exactly how I want it to. Struts can do the same. It all comes down to the shocks/struts you use, spring rates, sway bar, etc.mustangbrad said:Am I correct in thinking that the strut conversion is superior to the Mustang II conversion, as far as ride quality and handling? It sure seems like less work.
Thanks, I was seriously wondering if I had missed something. No insults intended to anyone who is or wants to run struts, I'm just asking questions is all.Psydwaze said:Space is also another reason that OEMs have adopted the strut suspension. The upper control arm presents an intrusion into the engine compartment. If room is available for a SLA then I feel it is the better choice for greater design flexibility. A few manufactures have even introduced SLA conversions for the '79 and later Mustang.