• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Strut Rod reinforcement

  • Thread starter Thread starter xafalcongs
  • Start date Start date Oct 21, 2004
X

xafalcongs

New Member
Apr 15, 2004
6
0
0
Lower Alabama
Oct 21, 2004
#1
  • Oct 21, 2004
  • #1
Can anyone provide me with pics of how I should reinforce the strut rod mounting location? I've search this forum and the web but have not found any pics. Thanks.

--J
 

jikelly

20+ Year Stangneter
Jul 9, 2003
872
53
99
Lubbock Tx
Oct 21, 2004
#2
  • Oct 21, 2004
  • #2
Unfortunatly I don't think anyone here has really done much with strut rods. I'm also interested in your question since I am currently having a problem with on of my strut rods moving around in its bushing even though I tightened the crap out of it. I think there are a few people who have installed the solid TCP strut rods on their early stangs.
 

66P51GT

New Member
Nov 7, 2003
721
1
0
Cerritos, CA
Oct 21, 2004
#3
  • Oct 21, 2004
  • #3
The strut mount location on the frame is a simple "H" |-| design. I nailed a curb doing about 30 mph in my first Mustang and the mount point looked more like this |^|. I had to use some percussion engineering to straighten it back out. This is where I believe you are asking for where to reinforce... yes?

If so, this is what I would do. The width is about ~3" or so. I would cut some ~3" wide heavy gauge metal and sandwich the mount location, creating an L on either side (front and rear of the mount point) and weld in place. You will need to drill the holes where the strut rod needs to reattach to the mounting bracket.

I remember reading a writeup on this but it was a few years ago on another board. Hope this is helpful.
 

jmagilto

New Member
Aug 14, 2003
19
0
1
Oct 21, 2004
#4
  • Oct 21, 2004
  • #4
Ditch the bushings and go kevlar injected heim joints

From what I read into your post, the bushings are not staying tight. This is DEFINITELY having a negative impact on your handling.

The job of the strut rod is to stop any forward and back deflection of the lower control arm. The quick and dirty way of effecting that in 1965 was to use a pair of the large doughnut bushings smashed together on the end of the shaft.

When the bushings are new, its OK. but as they age the lower control arm deflection starts to increase and begins to erode the handling of the car. Its gradual so over the years, the car eventually just seems 'loose'. In fact, now that the cars are really really old, a lot of the strut rods themselves are worn around the bushing interface. That just exacerbates the problem, and is likely the root cause of your inability to get the bushings to crush and stay tight.

I run the street or track strut rods on my 65.
http://www.nenny.com/strutrods/index.html

http://www.streetortrack.com/adjustable-strut-rods.asp

The street or track rods are comparable to the TCP rods but significantly cheaper. Give it a try, I think you will be pleasantly surprised.
jer

( I am not affiliated in any way with street or track llc, I just happen to be a fan of this particular modifcation)
 
X

xafalcongs

New Member
Apr 15, 2004
6
0
0
Lower Alabama
Oct 21, 2004
#5
  • Oct 21, 2004
  • #5
jmagilto said:
From what I read into your post, the bushings are not staying tight. This is DEFINITELY having a negative impact on your handling.


The street or track rods are comparable to the TCP rods but significantly cheaper. Give it a try, I think you will be pleasantly surprised.
jer

( I am not affiliated in any way with street or track llc, I just happen to be a fan of this particular modifcation)
Click to expand...

I'm currently installing a set of RRS adjustable strut rods along with their ranck and pinion steering setup. Since the strut rods are forced to handle a great deal of braking stress, I wanted to reinforce the forward mounting locations. However, being a novice I wanted to get some pics from guys that know what they are doing......hated to ask this question on the CC board as I'm too stupid to post over there even though those guys are a wealth of knowledge.......

Thanks for all of y'alls inputs.

--J
 
X

xafalcongs

New Member
Apr 15, 2004
6
0
0
Lower Alabama
Oct 21, 2004
#6
  • Oct 21, 2004
  • #6
K?ˆ?6P51GT]The strut mount location on the frame is a simple "H" |-| design. I nailed a curb doing about 30 mph in my first Mustang and the mount point looked more like this |^|. I had to use some percussion engineering to straighten it back out. This is where I believe you are asking for where to reinforce... yes?

If so, this is what I would do. The width is about ~3" or so. I would cut some ~3" wide heavy gauge metal and sandwich the mount location, creating an L on either side (front and rear of the mount point) and weld in place. You will need to drill the holes where the strut rod needs to reattach to the mounting bracket.

I remember reading a writeup on this but it was a few years ago on another board. Hope this is helpful.[/QUOTE]

Bingo! Thanks, that makes sense. What about the sides of the mount? Could you make a set of |=| reinforcement brackets in a bend brake and weld that around the factory mount? Or would that throw something off??? Also, would it be beneficial to weld any type of bracing between the 2 mounts?

Excuse the stupid questions, this is my first early Ford unibody. Last Ford I hoped up was a Merkur.

--J
 
B

bnickel

Founding Member
Aug 21, 2002
5,640
3
77
lubbock, texas
Oct 21, 2004
#7
  • Oct 21, 2004
  • #7
opentracker has done this or something similar, but i don't know if he has ever posted pics, well opentracker, what about some pics?
 
O

Opentracker

20+ Year Stangneter
Feb 4, 2004
516
0
16
Oct 21, 2004
#8
  • Oct 21, 2004
  • #8


I have done this mod to our car. I use the roll bar gussets and seam weld the area to re-enforce the strutt rod mounting point. I have never seen one bend. I'm not sure it's needed on a street car but it is a good idea for a track car with good brakes and racing tires. I make up a lot of time on the brakes, our car can out-brake most of the cars on the track. The factory spot welds are a safety issue with me, I like to weld up most/all of the seams on the cars.

I'll try and get some pic's of the car soon.


John
 
B

bnickel

Founding Member
Aug 21, 2002
5,640
3
77
lubbock, texas
Oct 21, 2004
#9
  • Oct 21, 2004
  • #9
thanks john, you're the man. i knew you'd come through
 

HistoricMustang

Active Member
Apr 11, 2003
2,359
0
46
Confederate States of America
Oct 22, 2004
#10
  • Oct 22, 2004
  • #10
John, have you had any of your cars on the scales? My FB comes in at 2650 with no driver or fuel. It is 1450 up front and 1200 in the rear.

Just wondering how that compares with yours.

HistoricMustang
www.historicmustang.com
 
X

xafalcongs

New Member
Apr 15, 2004
6
0
0
Lower Alabama
Oct 23, 2004
#11
  • Oct 23, 2004
  • #11
Opentracker said:
I have done this mod to our car. I use the roll bar gussets and seam weld the area to re-enforce the strutt rod mounting point. I have never seen one bend. I'm not sure it's needed on a street car but it is a good idea for a track car with good brakes and racing tires. I make up a lot of time on the brakes, our car can out-brake most of the cars on the track. The factory spot welds are a safety issue with me, I like to weld up most/all of the seams on the cars.

I'll try and get some pic's of the car soon.
Click to expand...

Thanks, this will help.

--J
 
O

Opentracker

20+ Year Stangneter
Feb 4, 2004
516
0
16
Oct 23, 2004
#12
  • Oct 23, 2004
  • #12
HistoricMustang said:
John, have you had any of your cars on the scales? My FB comes in at 2650 with no driver or fuel. It is 1450 up front and 1200 in the rear.

Just wondering how that compares with yours.

HistoricMustang
www.historicmustang.com
Click to expand...


I had the orange car on a truck scale a while back and it was a portly 3100lbs. It is a full interior car with a Cleveland motor, Versilles rear end, roll bar, and it is a bit heavy. My next project is a '65 Ranchero and it should come in under 2500lbs with glass fenders, hood, doors, no side windows or tail gate. I have driven light cars on the track in the past and I like the feel of a lighter car so the Falcon should be a blast to drive.

John
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Views vs attendance - check in and share your experience!
  • LILCBRA
  • Aug 7, 2026
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Replies
13
Views
329
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Aug 20, 2026
LILCBRA
Hood strut kit
  • 78 Mach1
  • Apr 16, 2025
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Replies
19
Views
1K
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech May 1, 2025
LILCBRA
A
Scott rod strut tower repair kit
  • Alfred L Lutz
  • Feb 15, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
260
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Feb 16, 2025
Noobz347
Suspension Harsh Ride
  • PonyGTrider
  • Mar 20, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3 4
Replies
62
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Apr 11, 2026
Noobz347
Electrical/engine bay harness questions
  • djj62478
  • May 29, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
358
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 6, 2026
djj62478
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?