• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Fox Strut spacer... wtf

  • Thread starter Thread starter kendawg73
  • Start date Start date Dec 2, 2018
K

kendawg73

Well-Known Member
Feb 5, 2014
474
102
64
Dec 2, 2018
#1
  • Dec 2, 2018
  • #1
Ok, I swear I'm going to burn this thing to the ground... every little thing is a PITA.... So I went to start putting the front suspension back in... put in the new ford racing lower in spring.. (using the MM tool) installed MM caster/camber plates... and new KYB strut... got the A-arm with spring jacked up... installed the top part of strut into caster plate, and got the bottom lined up with the 2 holes.... well here's the problem... the (2) spacer plates that go on both sides of the control arm, that goes inside the lower part of strut and the (2) bolts go through... well there is no room to get them in... heck I can't even get one slid in there....

So, I'm wondering, are these not needed anymore? are the lower strut opening smaller now and therefore don't need these to fill the gap? I'm looking at the ford service manual pdf I bought... and it's not even showing those 2 plates in the parts breakdown...
 
K

kendawg73

Well-Known Member
Feb 5, 2014
474
102
64
Dec 2, 2018
#2
  • Dec 2, 2018
  • #2
So I did some check on LMR where I bought these 3-4 years ago... I see there are 2 different parts numbers KYB-235005 and -235009... the difference is the spindle thickness... 005 is for 5.0 up to 86, and 4 cyl up to 93.. and the 009 is for the 5.0 form 87-93... so I figure great they send me the wrong ones.. I bought the kit that had all for shocks for the 87-93 5.0... so I just went out and looked at the box, and it's the correct part # 235009... but the opening on the lower strut is smaller then the stock one.. thus these spacers are not going to go in... so now I'm really confused...

*** I found a video of CJ-Pony parts install koni's , and you can see they had the spacers when they took them off, but they didn't put them back on (they didn't mention them) but those stuts looks the same as my Kyb's in that area... so to me looks like they made it smaller open like the up to 86 v8, and up to 93, cyl used... View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GzGYMuugSR4
I just wish they would tell you this... instead of making you guess/think you have the wrong parts...
 
Last edited: Dec 2, 2018

Blown88GT

Founding Member
Nov 13, 1999
2,283
524
164
Palm Beach Gardens, FL
Dec 2, 2018
#3
  • Dec 2, 2018
  • #3
I really can't tell you what's going on with your '90GT.
The attachment to the spindle must be very tight with no play at all.
All I can tell you is my'88GT had no spacers & the replacement Tokicos's didn't need them.

If you're not the original owner, how do you know that spindles weren't changed?
The strut does attach to the spindle & you may actually have SN95 spindles.
A Google search found this: https://www.maximummotorsports.com/tech_front_susp_7993to9604_spindle.aspx
 
K

kendawg73

Well-Known Member
Feb 5, 2014
474
102
64
Dec 2, 2018
#4
  • Dec 2, 2018
  • #4
Blown88GT said:
I really can't tell you what's going on with your '90GT.
The attachment to the spindle must be very tight with no play at all.
All I can tell you is my'88GT had no spacers & the replacement Tokicos's didn't need them.

If you're not the original owner, how do you know that spindles weren't changed?
The strut does attach to the spindle & you may actually have SN95 spindles.
A Google search found this: https://www.maximummotorsports.com/tech_front_susp_7993to9604_spindle.aspx
Click to expand...
In the j pony video, that one had the spacers as well, but u didnt see them put them back with the new struts.... my car looked completely stock, so I really dont think anyone changed the spindels/control arms...

Is sounds like the early 5.0 79-86 and the up to 93 4 cyl had wider control arm mounting area... and the 87-93 was thinner... I'm thinking they(ford) might of used the struts from the older v8 /4 cyl cars and thus has to use the spacers... and the after market strut replacements were made so they didnt need them....
 
Last edited: Dec 2, 2018

95BlueStallion

My assy trans to myself
15 Year Member
Feb 22, 2007
5,130
3,103
214
Cedar Rapids, Iowa
Dec 2, 2018
#5
  • Dec 2, 2018
  • #5
If it makes you feel any better, I didnt use any spacers on my car. If its snug, its snug. Once you put the bolts through and tighten everything up, Im sure you will be fine.
 

nickyb

I gotta say i never painted my nuts, Never Ever
15 Year Member
Apr 3, 2009
3,039
1,666
163
nevada
Dec 3, 2018
#6
  • Dec 3, 2018
  • #6
I have had my 1993 lx 5.0 for eleven years and I do not have spacers with the kyb struts,I have put nearly 100k miles on her this way ,so go ahead and put her together.
 

TOOLOW91

If you're the village idiot what's that make me?
20+ Year Stangneter
Nov 29, 1999
8,501
8,761
234
S.I.NY
Dec 3, 2018
#7
  • Dec 3, 2018
  • #7
No spacers here either . Thought that was only for certain struts or a 4 cyl spindle thing
 
K

kendawg73

Well-Known Member
Feb 5, 2014
474
102
64
Dec 4, 2018
#8
  • Dec 4, 2018
  • #8
Well from what I can gather, the 86 and earlier v8 and the 2.3, had the thicker spindles/control arms...thus the opening on the strut is wider. My theory is, Ford didn't want to have to source different struts for the 87-93 v8's so they used these plate spacers.... and now the replacement struts are made the right size and thus don't need them... even in the video I posted from CJ Pony you can see that car had them and that was for sure a 87- up car.

Here are some pics I took to show others if they don't know what I'm referring too...(may help them if they have this happen to them) I took measurement of old and new struts and with the spacers in the old strut.... needless to say the new ones bolted up fine.
 

Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor
Admin Dude
Jan 4, 1985
43,531
21,699
234
Box behind Walmart
Dec 5, 2018
#9
  • Dec 5, 2018
  • #9
kendawg73 said:
the 86 and earlier v8 and the 2.3, had the thicker spindles/control arms
Click to expand...


This is why you see so many brake and strut conversion kits listed for 89 to 93 and exclude 79-86. To swap to a later model strut on my 86, I had to install 'shims'. Swapping to a later model spindle of course, eliminates the need for this.
 

Reddevil91

15 Year Member
Mar 3, 2010
1,630
773
163
Dec 5, 2018
#10
  • Dec 5, 2018
  • #10
Yeah I put tokico blues all the way around and I can’t recall using those shins bc it was snug, my older Monroe’s I believe they were did have those
 

Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor
Admin Dude
Jan 4, 1985
43,531
21,699
234
Box behind Walmart
Dec 6, 2018
#11
  • Dec 6, 2018
  • #11
You can throw steel washers in there and call it a day.
 

Blown88GT

Founding Member
Nov 13, 1999
2,283
524
164
Palm Beach Gardens, FL
Dec 8, 2018
#12
  • Dec 8, 2018
  • #12
Noobz347 said:
This is why you see so many brake and strut conversion kits listed for 89 to 93 and exclude 79-86. To swap to a later model strut on my 86, I had to install 'shims'. Swapping to a later model spindle of course, eliminates the need for this.
Click to expand...
The OP sig. says he has a '90GT.
 

Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor
Admin Dude
Jan 4, 1985
43,531
21,699
234
Box behind Walmart
Dec 8, 2018
#13
  • Dec 8, 2018
  • #13
Blown88GT said:
The OP sig. says he has a '90GT.
Click to expand...

I missed that piece. In that case, the extra plates are for pre-87 and not used. LoL
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,349
18,084
224
Massachusetts
Dec 8, 2018
#14
  • Dec 8, 2018
  • #14
Noobz347 said:
I missed that piece. In that case, the extra plates are for pre-87 and not used. LoL
Click to expand...


This^

Pre 87 and 87-93 4cyl as they use the smaller pre-87 brakes and spindles. Sometimes the shims are included when you buy struts.

Sn95 spindles don't use the shins either.

Toss em on eBay and sell them to someone who needs them. I think 2-3 days ago I saw someone on a forum requesting some. Unfortunately I don't recall where
 

Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor
Admin Dude
Jan 4, 1985
43,531
21,699
234
Box behind Walmart
Dec 8, 2018
#15
  • Dec 8, 2018
  • #15
When I needed a kit [with] the plates, nobody made them and none could be found. LoL It was the strangest thing. Now that they actually include adapter plates with the kits, nobody knows what they're for.

'Good one', aftermarket companies.
 
Reactions: General karthief
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Front Coil Overs and Rear Traditional Springs within a Maximum Motorsports K-Member Kit
  • Habu135
  • Sep 7, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
835
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 9, 2026
Habu135
Suspension Harsh Ride
  • PonyGTrider
  • Mar 20, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3 4
Replies
62
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Apr 11, 2026
Noobz347
Fox Alignment Suggestions
  • PonyGTrider
  • Jul 12, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
595
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 13, 2025
PonyGTrider
R
What's it Worth? 1997 Cobra, a ton of mods and restoration
  • riored97snake
  • Jun 18, 2026
  • What is it Worth?!?!?
Replies
2
Views
429
What is it Worth?!?!? Jun 21, 2026
riored97snake
R
B
Where to go from here on my build…
  • B0udreaux
  • Jul 14, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
404
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 18, 2026
AeroCoupe
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?