• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

summit headers = BBK?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 93trickflow5oh
  • Start date Start date Jan 7, 2007
9

93trickflow5oh

Founding Member
Oct 19, 2000
200
0
0
Lexington, SC
Jan 7, 2007
#1
  • Jan 7, 2007
  • #1
I was looking at the headers from summit and BBK and noticed they look identical. Although the summit headers are made of thicker 14 ga steel and the BBk's are 16 ga. What do you guys think? Top pic is BBK bottom is Summit.
View attachment 413159
View attachment 413161
 

90

Active Member
Sep 24, 2006
0
1
43
Michigan insane asylum
Jan 7, 2007
#2
  • Jan 7, 2007
  • #2
Are the Prices the same as well ?
 
9

93trickflow5oh

Founding Member
Oct 19, 2000
200
0
0
Lexington, SC
Jan 7, 2007
#3
  • Jan 7, 2007
  • #3
BBK Ceramic = 275.96
Summit Ceramic = 229.95
 

89streetbeast

New Member
Dec 4, 2006
365
1
0
horton,ks
Jan 7, 2007
#4
  • Jan 7, 2007
  • #4
only thing i see diff. is the missing bbk plaque on the summit headers otherwise they look kinda the same.
 

90

Active Member
Sep 24, 2006
0
1
43
Michigan insane asylum
Jan 7, 2007
#5
  • Jan 7, 2007
  • #5
thats all it looks like to me too... i was told the summit brands are made cheaper, just to spend the extra cash and get the better brand name.. which is all your paying the extra 40 dollars is for the BBK name
 

chaos254

Founding Member
Jul 27, 2002
467
3
29
NJ
Jan 7, 2007
#6
  • Jan 7, 2007
  • #6
im pretty sure their made by flow-tech....
 

68keyblr

20+ Year Stangneter
Mar 17, 2003
946
20
49
Arizona
Jan 7, 2007
#7
  • Jan 7, 2007
  • #7
I just got the Summity ceramic coated shorties. They are excellent, quality is as good as any other header I've ever bought and the price is right
 

Roland69

Sergeant Tangnet
Sep 17, 2005
2,867
2
58
Port Elgin, Ontario
Jan 7, 2007
#8
  • Jan 7, 2007
  • #8
is there a difference in the thickness of the flange
 
9

93trickflow5oh

Founding Member
Oct 19, 2000
200
0
0
Lexington, SC
Jan 7, 2007
#9
  • Jan 7, 2007
  • #9
Roland69 said:
is there a difference in the thickness of the flange
Click to expand...

Actually they are both 3/8 and the summits tubes are thicker metal than BBK. They look nothing like the flowtechs.

68keyblr How was the fit on them?
 

Roland69

Sergeant Tangnet
Sep 17, 2005
2,867
2
58
Port Elgin, Ontario
Jan 7, 2007
#10
  • Jan 7, 2007
  • #10
so really the summit ones are a better header than the BBK......depending on fit
 
9

93trickflow5oh

Founding Member
Oct 19, 2000
200
0
0
Lexington, SC
Jan 8, 2007
#11
  • Jan 8, 2007
  • #11
Seems to be, but yes it all depends on the fit.
 
D

Daggar

New Member
Jul 19, 2004
3,902
5
0
Jan 8, 2007
#12
  • Jan 8, 2007
  • #12
Shopping thread

--moved to Talk--
 
S

Stang_Dude

New Member
Apr 18, 2005
1
0
0
Jan 8, 2007
#13
  • Jan 8, 2007
  • #13
90mustang_GT5.0 said:
... i was told the summit brands are made cheaper, just to spend the extra cash and get the better brand name..
Click to expand...

On many parts, they're made by brand-name companies for Summit. A clear example is the aftermarket wiring harnesses -- made by Painless Wiring and same instructions, but with the brand changed to Summit.

-Neil.
 

mattmcdan

Member
Apr 19, 2006
176
0
19
Okeechobee, Florida
Jan 8, 2007
#14
  • Jan 8, 2007
  • #14
I bought the summit headers too, they fit fantastic, the flanges are thick, and they still look new.
 

68keyblr

20+ Year Stangneter
Mar 17, 2003
946
20
49
Arizona
Jan 8, 2007
#15
  • Jan 8, 2007
  • #15
93trickflow5oh said:
Actually they are both 3/8 and the summits tubes are thicker metal than BBK. They look nothing like the flowtechs.

68keyblr How was the fit on them?
Click to expand...

I'll see if I can do a test-fit tonight. Initial inspection looks pretty good though.

The weird thing about all of this is that basically the same header made for a classic 302 will set you back at least $450. Just installed a set of JBA ceramic shorties on my mom's '68 and she got them "on sale" for $450. They are almost identical to the Summit shorties for 5.0!
 
9

93trickflow5oh

Founding Member
Oct 19, 2000
200
0
0
Lexington, SC
Jan 8, 2007
#16
  • Jan 8, 2007
  • #16
For those of you with them, how do the welds look?
 

SteedaGT9150

Advanced Member
Nov 10, 2004
1,351
59
68
Maryland
Jan 8, 2007
#17
  • Jan 8, 2007
  • #17
i think hooker makes some of summits headers
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Staytuned stock bottem end build...
  • rednotch
  • Dec 13, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
302
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 13, 2025
Noobz347
3
Turbo header Starter wire routing?
  • 387lx
  • Mar 3, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
6
Views
207
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 3, 2026
387lx
3
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
639
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 28, 2026
Noobz347
Might have to get a Dart block but don't want to and if I do, then 363 instead of 331. Thoughts on what I've already bought so far.......
  • from6to8
  • Jul 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
52
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 9, 2025
from6to8
P
Tailpipes for '88 GT
  • pindude80
  • Apr 30, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
31
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 13, 2025
pindude80
P
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?