SummitRacing's '95 GT Mustang

JJ95GTID

Active Member

Sep 22, 2003

1,141

4

49

Phoenix, AZ

Jan 2, 2008

#1

• Jan 2, 2008

• #1

Anyone else notice the latest Summit Racing's catalog feature car?

It's a '95 GT.

I like the paint scheme and overall look of the car.

As for the mods I think they should've did some research here first

But, they are obviously trying to sell their own products so more power to them

 

ProKiller

Founding Member

Apr 26, 2002

3,064

15

78

PA

Jan 2, 2008

#2

• Jan 2, 2008

• #2

i like the orange but those kind of stripes never thrilled me. it deprives the hood of its body lines.

any one know what spoiler is on it? it looks like stock, but its not.

 

JJ95GTID

Active Member

Sep 22, 2003

1,141

4

49

Phoenix, AZ

Jan 2, 2008

#3

• Jan 2, 2008

• #3

The link

http://www.summitracing.com/streetandstrip/feature_vehicles.asp?ID={9C4A8267-7777-4E93-B4D3-DD7F81931D99}

 

Bosko5.0

Active Member

May 18, 2006

1,067

0

37

longwood, FL

Jan 2, 2008

#4

• Jan 2, 2008

• #4

I think the wing is a cervinis stalker wing.

I think it looks good.

 

Black Stampede

Founding Member

Sep 3, 2002

1,811

2

39

Grand Rapids, MI

Jan 2, 2008

#5

• Jan 2, 2008

• #5

I think it looks pretty cool aside from needing wheel spacers and not being lowered enough imo. As for the power, hahahaha.

 

autumn_again

New Member

Oct 2, 2007

356

0

0

Hamilton, NJ

Jan 2, 2008

#6

• Jan 2, 2008

• #6

looks pretty decent.

don't know how i feel about the wheels.

i've seen them on a couple cars if they are the ones i'm thinking of. and they never really interested me.

 

Yobi1Kanobi

Member

Apr 9, 2003

559

0

16

Jan 2, 2008

#7

• Jan 2, 2008

• #7

Its probably in need of a good tune but not bad in power for bolt ons and HCI

 

R

red95gtconvert

New Member

May 29, 2006

382

0

0

Ponca city, OK

Jan 2, 2008

#8

• Jan 2, 2008

• #8

I think the car looks pretty good, the pullies and "cold air" intake did alot didn't they

 

diablostang

New Member

Sep 21, 2004

425

0

0

Raleigh, NC

Jan 2, 2008

#9

• Jan 2, 2008

• #9

The power #'s are disturbing.


It looks overdone on the outside, and is underdone on the engine.

 

Yobi1Kanobi

Member

Apr 9, 2003

559

0

16

Jan 3, 2008

#10

• Jan 3, 2008

• #10

diablostang said:

The power #'s are disturbing.


It looks overdone on the outside, and is underdone on the engine.

Click to expand...

How would you consider it disturbing coming in close to 300rwhp without any tune. It sounds about right....Im not arguing I just really would like to know what looks off?

 

F

frcefedlx

New Member

Dec 6, 2004

184

0

0

Jan 3, 2008

#11

• Jan 3, 2008

• #11

I thought it was a 347ci and I am wrong the 347 is part of stage 4 in the build. Those numbers are not to bad then.

 

Killercanary

The car that set the bar.

Founding Member

Nov 29, 1999

5,676

1

76

Altoona, PA

Jan 3, 2008

#12

• Jan 3, 2008

• #12

umm... I don't have anything good to say about that car, its looks, or the power production since its still a 302. You would have thought it could have been done better and made more than that with summitt backing it. Geez...

 

Black95GTS

Active Member

Jan 8, 2004

1,644

3

38

Marlborough, MA

Jan 3, 2008

#13

• Jan 3, 2008

• #13

Looks like an angry pumpkin.

Knowing that summit is backing it I'm surprised they didn't drop a Chevy 350 in there, a ford 9 inch out of a truck, and call it a day. That seems to be there MO.

Ever read "Prof. Overdrive?" What a buffoon, his advice causes me physical pain.

Adam

 

HankyGT

Member

Jan 15, 2006

81

3

6

Warren, OH

Jan 3, 2008

#14

• Jan 3, 2008

• #14

You guys should read that article a bit further if you actually support the #'s it made.

The place they took it to (which no-one around here trusts that place...too many horror stories), it dyno'd like 190rwhp STOCK.

That means, thats a high ass reading dyno....where I took my car, stockers make 160rwhp

30hp diff


After all that **** it made like 270 ON THE SAME DYNO WITH A TUNE!!

80hp gain.

Mine threw 296 on the same mustang dyno that a stocker will spin 160rwhp

I mean, theoretically thats a damn 60rwhp difference!

Crap components and tune. AFR FTMFW


Yet people wonder why 5.slows catch ****......imagine how many stock LS1/LT1 guys are laughing at that mess.

I know I did.

Furthermore, I'd really like to see what the smaller TFS heads do on a 347. That might elude to my next car descion be it stroker or boost.

FWIW, the stance plus the crap offset on those wheels make me wanna yarf

 

Pokageek

Active Member

Jun 10, 2005

2,767

0

46

MA, USA

Jan 4, 2008

#15

• Jan 4, 2008

• #15

Too tacky for me..

 

HankyGT

Member

Jan 15, 2006

81

3

6

Warren, OH

Jan 4, 2008

#16

• Jan 4, 2008

• #16

Re-read the article at home

196rwhp stock :rollseyes:

....even more lame.

 

earleys94gt

Active Member

Aug 31, 2003

1,223

16

49

Ashley, Ohio

Jan 4, 2008

#17

• Jan 4, 2008

• #17

The place they took it to (which no-one around here trusts that place...too many horror stories)

Click to expand...

+1, heard some bad things about them too.