Engine Surging idle on start-up

keel

Active Member
Aug 23, 2020
194
68
38
Seattle, Wa
I started a similar thread about a year ago on this topic but I'm still having idle surge issues and I have some more information so I would like to start with a clean slate.

Here is what I know:
- Car has a terrible surging idle upon startup that will go away after feathering the throttle for a few seconds (bad enough that the car wants to die)
- Car starts up with zero surging when the MAF is unplugged
- No codes other than smog stuff because I deleted all the emissions equipment
- Already tried replacing the sensor and the connector, did not change the problem
- Car runs fine once the idle settles down

Another weird symptom that has come up is that when driving at part throttle the car will have a sudden surge of power at around 1700-2000 RPM. It doesn't feel like it is lacking on power or misfiring or anything at low RPM, it just feels like I'm pressing the pedal a little bit more even when I am holding the throttle at the same position. Unsure if this is related to the idle surge but it could be.

What could all of this mean?
 
So I am going to assume that you have checked for vacuum leaks, have the throttle stop correctly adjusted, and have done a base idle reset. Obviously you have checked for KOEO and KOER codes. I know all of this was in the other thread but I think will help here.
Year of car
Auto/Manual
Engine and mods (be as specific)
Have you fixed anything else on the car while trouble shooting this issue?

I know this is frustrating but I am going to say it anyway. Starting a new thread always seems like a good idea as it allows you to clear your head and start the process over. What is does for everyone else is cause chaos as we don't have all the previous information. My suggestion here would be to go back to the other thread and do a summary post of all the things that have been done or looked at and then restate what the car is incorrectly doing. You can even change the title of the thread to better reflect the current issue(s).

I had to go back and read both pages again to remember what all had been done. What bothers me the most is that the base idle reset did nothing which I find very odd. I do not believe you have sent the ECU off for any kind of repairs and I would strongly encourage this. I am not saying this is the fix but they are 30+ years old and there are multiple parts in them that have basically timed out and need to be replaced. I want to say that one member sent theirs off just as a maintenance things, The ECU Exchange replaced several parts, and after he got it back it fixed several really small things that were not keeping the car from running but were not "right".

Its up to you but having mulitple threads on the same issue is kind of confusing to those of us that are trying to help so we try and discourage it.
 
I want to say that one member sent theirs off just as a maintenance things, The ECU Exchange replaced several parts, and after he got it back it fixed several really small things that were not keeping the car from running but were not "right".
Will second this. AeroCoupe may not be referring to me, but i sent my ECU out to ECUexchange just for maintenance since i didn't know the condition of the ECU. Car ran fine, no 'reason' to send it out for repair. They found multiple issues that they fixed. The big one which i'm surprised didn't affect drivability was some power supply on the board wasn't outputting the incorrect voltage (too low of voltage if i recall). Don't know which one or what it did, but they replaced it, fixed physical board damaged, traces, capacitors, etc. Now, at least i know my computer is running as best as it can for hopefully a long time to come.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AeroCoupe
So I am going to assume that you have checked for vacuum leaks, have the throttle stop correctly adjusted, and have done a base idle reset. Obviously you have checked for KOEO and KOER codes. I know all of this was in the other thread but I think will help here.
Year of car
Auto/Manual
Engine and mods (be as specific)
Have you fixed anything else on the car while trouble shooting this issue?

I know this is frustrating but I am going to say it anyway. Starting a new thread always seems like a good idea as it allows you to clear your head and start the process over. What is does for everyone else is cause chaos as we don't have all the previous information. My suggestion here would be to go back to the other thread and do a summary post of all the things that have been done or looked at and then restate what the car is incorrectly doing. You can even change the title of the thread to better reflect the current issue(s).

I had to go back and read both pages again to remember what all had been done. What bothers me the most is that the base idle reset did nothing which I find very odd. I do not believe you have sent the ECU off for any kind of repairs and I would strongly encourage this. I am not saying this is the fix but they are 30+ years old and there are multiple parts in them that have basically timed out and need to be replaced. I want to say that one member sent theirs off just as a maintenance things, The ECU Exchange replaced several parts, and after he got it back it fixed several really small things that were not keeping the car from running but were not "right".

Its up to you but having mulitple threads on the same issue is kind of confusing to those of us that are trying to help so we try and discourage it.
You're likely referring to me, this is done do to the age of these computers, First thing I do is send them to get checked out, while I'm not that tech savvy but I understand things, like the compter 'sees' things from the senors and reacts per installed parameters, when we start up cold the computer does things that are different when hot so if a capacitor is malfunctioning in cold mode then the same behavior will not be present in 'hot mode.
Best I came explain
 
First I'll just say that in the future I'll keep it to one thread, sorry about that.

I can't say I am surprised to hear that it might be the ECU, I have been dealing with a lot of weird quirks with the car for years that seem to come and go and have no real diagnosis. Never anything catastrophic that caused that car to break down but definitely annoying. This confirms my suspicions that the ECU might be malfunctioning.

I do know for a fact that the parts car I pulled the computer from had sat for at least 10 years without being driven, possibly a lot more. There was damage from moisture all over everything on the interior. Hopefully the inside of the computer isn't corroded.

I'll send it out and report back with results eventually.
 
I do know for a fact that the parts car I pulled the computer from had sat for at least 10 years without being driven, possibly a lot more. There was damage from moisture all over everything on the interior. Hopefully the inside of the computer isn't corroded.

1755125687435.webp
 
  • Haha
Reactions: gkomo
Not a flood car thankfully... The previous owner had rear ended somebody pretty hard at some point and parked the car. I was told it was stored inside while it sat but it was probably outside for a while at some point.

Even if the computer is bad I still got a ton of goodies from it :)
 
Alright finally got the car back up and running. ECU Exchange informed me that they did repair some parts in the computer (some board damage and power supply) but the repairs did not seem to have a major effect on the issues I'm having.

However, it did trip the CEL for a few minutes when I was driving and the ECU stored code 41, 91, 95, and 96.

Any idea where to go from here with diagnostics?
 
So is this still the 93 4 cylinder car converted to a 5.0 using the motor and trans from an 89 car? I am going to assume that since you got it running you used a 92.5-93 ECU harness out of a 5.0 car.

Code 41 - passenger O2 reading lean
Code 91 - driver O2 reading lean


95 - Fuel Pump Circuit Open-PCM To Motor Ground (CM,O)
96 - Fuel Pump Circuit Open-Battery To PCM (CM,O)

95 KOEO FPM signal indicates circuit failure FPM senses fuel pump voltage is out of range.
96 KOEO Fuel pump secondary circuit failure FP secondary circuit is bad or fuel pump relay is bad.

Either a wiring issue or a bad fuel pump relay.
 
Yeah I used a harness from a '93. Do you think the codes are related to the way the car is behaving? I checked fuel pressure and it seemed fine, reading 40 PSI at idle with the vacuum hose disconnected from the fuel pressure regulator and it dropped to about 35 PSI with vacuum.
 
It’s running lean and having a fuel pump problem. Pressure at idle is good but what is it under load? Should not change so if it’s dipping then it’s going to go lean as indicated by the codes.

Have you changed the fuel pump at any point? Is the fuel pump relay original or has it been changed?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mcmahst
It could be the rubber hose between the pump and the hanger but you won't know until you can see the pressure under load or just pull the tank and take a look but that is some work. If the pump has never been replaced then maybe its time.
 
I changed the fuel pump out a couple years ago to a 155LPH pump when I did HCI so my pump should be fine. I think it's been about 5 years since I did a fuel filter so maybe that's due. And I've never changed the fuel pump relay since I got the harness so who knows how old that is. So that will probably be the first thing I address (and it's cheap).