• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Suspension?

  • Thread starter Thread starter WhyTryy5.0
  • Start date Start date Dec 17, 2003
W

WhyTryy5.0

New Member
Feb 13, 2003
324
0
0
T-DOT, Canada - SN95 VERT
Dec 17, 2003
#1
  • Dec 17, 2003
  • #1
If you ran into some money and were finally able to buy a nice suspension system. What would you get? I have Mac lowering springs and stock struts and shocks. I was going to get Granatelli upper/lower control arms, Koni sport or tokico illuminas? I was thinking of a pan hard bar ... I also had an offer to buy a K-MEMBER KIT:k-member, tubular a arms, and a coil over conversion.

What are coil overs like???? I hear they are for cars that have been built for it like the Eclipse, some hondas. Is this true?? Anybody have coil overs??

Thanks
Justin
 

Numbles

Active Member
Dec 10, 2003
998
0
36
Chicago, IL
Dec 17, 2003
#2
  • Dec 17, 2003
  • #2
Us convertable people can only benifit from going to a tubular k member setup(Less weight is always good). But coilovers shouldn't be based on what car you have but what you wanna do with the car. You can get different springrates for drag or autocross. And you can get ajustable shocks to do both if you get an intermediate rated spring.

Id go with a tubular k-member and coilovers. Just because you can ajust the ride height. One day you can cruise around with the car slammed. And the next, you can hop it up for good weight transfer at the track.
 
W

WhyTryy5.0

New Member
Feb 13, 2003
324
0
0
T-DOT, Canada - SN95 VERT
Dec 17, 2003
#3
  • Dec 17, 2003
  • #3
Numbles said:
Us convertable people can only benifit from going to a tubular k member setup(Less weight is always good). But coilovers shouldn't be based on what car you have but what you wanna do with the car. You can get different springrates for drag or autocross. And you can get ajustable shocks to do both if you get an intermediate rated spring.

Id go with a tubular k-member and coilovers. Just because you can ajust the ride height. One day you can cruise around with the car slammed. And the next, you can hop it up for good weight transfer at the track.
Click to expand...

I like the flexibility of the height adjustment alot. I really want to get them but I hear bad things as well. Like bending them and twisting them with race driving. I"ve heard it has something to do with where the strut enters where the CC plates go.

Have you heard of people with them and their experience?
 

Numbles

Active Member
Dec 10, 2003
998
0
36
Chicago, IL
Dec 17, 2003
#4
  • Dec 17, 2003
  • #4
TTT for ya. I have never heard of any twisting or binding like problems with coilovers. If there was a problem you would experience the problem with the stock shocks too because they go in the same place.

But definately gotta get subframes. Its just one of those things the convertable needs to get rid of flex.
 
W

WhyTryy5.0

New Member
Feb 13, 2003
324
0
0
T-DOT, Canada - SN95 VERT
Dec 17, 2003
#5
  • Dec 17, 2003
  • #5
Numbles said:
TTT for ya. I have never heard of any twisting or binding like problems with coilovers. If there was a problem you would experience the problem with the stock shocks too because they go in the same place.

But definately gotta get subframes. Its just one of those things the convertable needs to get rid of flex.
Click to expand...

oHH Yeah for sure. Subframes were the first upgrade i did. I have decided against coil overs I think. I have heard the same thing about them over and over again about if you drive on the street you punish the alluminum sleeve. It ends up warping and damaging the sleeve which can get costly. Too bad I like the adjustability alot. You can get Steel sleeves which are alot stronger. But I ask myself "Is it really worth all of this $$$ to lose 70 lbs involving changing k-member and tubular and coil over conversion" ... and also put coil overs on the back too, even more $$$. What do you think?

Justin
 

Numbles

Active Member
Dec 10, 2003
998
0
36
Chicago, IL
Dec 17, 2003
#6
  • Dec 17, 2003
  • #6
Its up to you but im definately going to get coilovers. I cant stand the idea of paying money to lower my car and not have absolute control of where it sits. But thats my opinion.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Fox Suspensión Noise
  • PonyGTrider
  • Nov 24, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
344
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 8, 2026
PonyGTrider
C
SN95 Another Coyote swap list
  • catkiller
  • May 10, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
81
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 10, 2026
catkiller
C
A definitive answer to the question of how much height Energy Suspension isolators add
  • 2000xp8
  • May 20, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
246
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 20, 2025
2000xp8
A
SOLD For Sale: 1993 Ford Mustang Cobra Modified
  • anjteal93
  • Sep 5, 2025
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
13
Views
1K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Oct 26, 2025
Mindseye007
T
For Sale 1990 GT Convertible Resto-mod
  • teneck83
  • Jun 19, 2025
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
0
Views
328
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Jun 19, 2025
teneck83
T
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?