• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

suspention POLL!!

  • Thread starter Thread starter Stallion
  • Start date Start date Jun 20, 2004

which is better? for street/ occational track use

  • tourqe arm

    Votes: 6 50.0%
  • steeda 5 link

    Votes: 6 50.0%
  • neither, don't know whats does what.

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    12
  • Poll closed Jun 25, 2004.

Stallion

Banned
Dec 16, 2002
86
0
0
home, finnally
Jun 20, 2004
#1
  • Jun 20, 2004
  • #1
I was wondering which is better for axel control on the mustang?
A maximum motorsports torque arm or steedas 5-link?? which works better??


a couple of pics for u,

MM torque arm:

installed-->


steeda 5-link 2:
 

Stallion

Banned
Dec 16, 2002
86
0
0
home, finnally
Jun 20, 2004
#2
  • Jun 20, 2004
  • #2
not comparing companys, just asking which consept works better.
 

FallenPhoenix

New Member
Nov 22, 2003
911
0
0
Odessa Tx
Jun 20, 2004
#3
  • Jun 20, 2004
  • #3
from what I've seen the 5-link is better, as it more postively locates the rear axle, but it's also more weight and more complicated to install and tune (assuming it's adjustable)

I hope to get the steeda 5-link for my car sometime in the future.
 

Stallion

Banned
Dec 16, 2002
86
0
0
home, finnally
Jun 20, 2004
#4
  • Jun 20, 2004
  • #4
FallenPhoenix said:
from what I've seen the 5-link is better, as it more postively locates the rear axle, but it's also more weight and more complicated to install and tune (assuming it's adjustable)

I hope to get the steeda 5-link for my car sometime in the future.
Click to expand...
well they (steeda) claim on there site that there product doesn't add weight, according to them it cancels out so that there is no additional gain. thats nice but the rear is the one place i dont mind it gainint a little weight, if it were it would get a better distrobution and would corner more like a vette does. the only peice of suspention geometry which i would need is a k-member with upper control arms and coil over front shocks. then i think the mustang would have every thing it needs to corner with vettes and the like.
 

Tylerb59

Banned
Mar 7, 2003
1,895
0
0
Arlington, WA
Jun 20, 2004
#5
  • Jun 20, 2004
  • #5
3 link is much better setup then 4.

I'm sorry for not elaborating the point, but from what I've read and understood it's the best route to go. I understand GM uses 3 point suspension on the Camaro / Firebird as well.

I'd get the torque arm and remove the upper control arms. Make sure you have MM adjustable lower control arms to go with it though.

I think the 5 link suspension would work well if you're wanting to replace everything.
 
M

MaxMustang

New Member
Jul 23, 2003
53
0
0
Jun 20, 2004
#6
  • Jun 20, 2004
  • #6
Coil-overs won't fit with the Steeda 5 link. Pinion angle still "floats".

Torque arm can weight more. Subframes are required for most kits.

Ford seems to like a true 3-link now for the 2005. No kit for that, yet.
 

kboy262

Active Member
Apr 20, 2003
437
0
26
Atlanta-Kennesaw
Jun 20, 2004
#7
  • Jun 20, 2004
  • #7
Correct me if I am wrong but does the Steeda 5-link require you to have either side-exhaust or dumps? I heard this in the past that you cannot run tailpipes out the back because of their set-up and I am just not 100% sure.
 

FallenPhoenix

New Member
Nov 22, 2003
911
0
0
Odessa Tx
Jun 20, 2004
#8
  • Jun 20, 2004
  • #8
kboy262 said:
Correct me if I am wrong but does the Steeda 5-link require you to have either side-exhaust or dumps? I heard this in the past that you cannot run tailpipes out the back because of their set-up and I am just not 100% sure.
Click to expand...

I read the new kit will allow dual pipes out the back. I think I read it on Steeda's site actually.
 

kboy262

Active Member
Apr 20, 2003
437
0
26
Atlanta-Kennesaw
Jun 20, 2004
#9
  • Jun 20, 2004
  • #9
FallenPhoenix said:
I read the new kit will allow dual pipes out the back. I think I read it on Steeda's site actually.
Click to expand...

Thanks
 

FallenPhoenix

New Member
Nov 22, 2003
911
0
0
Odessa Tx
Jun 20, 2004
#10
  • Jun 20, 2004
  • #10
Steeda 5-link 2
 

LoneGunman

New Member
Jan 27, 2002
40
0
0
Las Vegas, NV
Jun 21, 2004
#11
  • Jun 21, 2004
  • #11
I have been very happy with the MM Torque Arm.
 
N

nasa-x

New Member
Jun 5, 2004
2
0
0
Jun 21, 2004
#12
  • Jun 21, 2004
  • #12
If you are running SCCA American Sedan or are stuck by the rules get the Steeda. If not get the Torque Arm / Panhard setup from MM or Griggs. I prefer the Griggs setup, but I have driven both and find the handling superior to the Steeda setup.
 

DTMach1

New Member
Jun 14, 2004
240
0
0
Virginia Beach, VA
Jun 21, 2004
#13
  • Jun 21, 2004
  • #13
like he said, if you're rooad racing go witht the 5link...i've drove a GT with a 5-link and it was very agile, especially around tight cornering where the stock rubber gave out...had that car had some better tires I probably could've got some more out of the 5-link.

On street driving the 5-link is a little over kill...I'd get the tq arm with full length sub frame connectors...you'll notice a big improvement over the stock 4 link...especially during a hard brake...the car will not nose dive as bad...and you'll feel that the rear of the car is a little less...foor lack of better words...happy.
 

Stallion

Banned
Dec 16, 2002
86
0
0
home, finnally
Jun 21, 2004
#14
  • Jun 21, 2004
  • #14
well, i wasn't going to leave out the panhard bar or aftermarket control arms. I was just comparing the 5-link to the torqe arm. looks like the torqe arm is a win, for me any ways.
 
N

nasa-x

New Member
Jun 5, 2004
2
0
0
Jun 21, 2004
#15
  • Jun 21, 2004
  • #15
DTMach1 , I actually meant go with the 5-link only if you are road racing and have RULES preventing you from running a torque arm like American Sedan does.

NASA American Iron has no such rules and most are running a Torque Arm. The winners seem to be running Griggs with some MM mixed in there.

Good choice Stallion
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Progress Thread 91GTstroked 90 7 up convertible build
  • 91GTstroked
  • Apr 18, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
268
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 22, 2026
91GTstroked
New Products From J&M Products - 1979-1998 & 1999-2004 Race/Extreme Duty Rear Lower Control Arms
  • J&M Products
  • Oct 9, 2025
  • Vendor Sponsor Forums
Replies
0
Views
234
Vendor Sponsor Forums Oct 9, 2025
J&M Products
Drivetrain Rear end clunk
  • seanmahoney
  • Oct 13, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
375
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Oct 13, 2025
nickyb
T
For Sale 1990 GT Convertible Resto-mod
  • teneck83
  • Jun 19, 2025
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
0
Views
324
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Jun 19, 2025
teneck83
T
A
SOLD For Sale: 1993 Ford Mustang Cobra Modified
  • anjteal93
  • Sep 5, 2025
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
13
Views
1K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Oct 26, 2025
Mindseye007
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?