svo (look) conversion

[andrw]

just curious if anyone has ever done it?

 

[Stinger]

I'm sure some have but it seems counter-productive to me. If you've got access to that many good SVO parts then just take the whole car and use it.

 

[bhuff30]

go save an SVO!

 

[gibson89LX]

I'm sure some have but it seems counter-productive to me. If you've got access to that many good SVO parts then just take the whole car and use it.

One could spend a grand at SVPU though... it'd look alot like one on the outside...

 

[andrw]

no i mean, headlights, spoiler. im not talking fooling you Stinger, just general, overall look.

 

[ka0tyk]

i saw an SVO that had been converted to a 87-93 front end... it had the SVO rims and interior and that flimsy useless wing on the hatch... but it had a 87-93 front end... only thing i could think of was that it got in an accident and SVO front ends cost BOOTY so they just bought aftermarket parts... i dont blame em... headlights for SVO's are like $300-500 new!!!

 

[351wcoupe]

i saw an SVO that had been converted to a 87-93 front end... it had the SVO rims and interior and that flimsy useless wing on the hatch... but it had a 87-93 front end... only thing i could think of was that it got in an accident and SVO front ends cost BOOTY so they just bought aftermarket parts... i dont blame em... headlights for SVO's are like $300-500 new!!!

yeah but that comes with owning an SVO......unforunately.

 

[jzleach1]

flimsy useless wing on the hatch...

Useless wing? If you've read the design history on this car that upper bi-wing helped in producing down force more so then a single wing. As far as "flimsy" goes there are ways to make the wing stronger by using supports. Besides, it is one of the trademarks for these cars.