• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

Swap a 5.0 into a 99+GT?

  • Thread starter Thread starter KickerStang
  • Start date Start date Jul 31, 2003
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
Next
1 of 4 Next Last
K

KickerStang

Founding Member
May 6, 2002
593
0
0
Colorado Springs
Jul 31, 2003
#1
  • Jul 31, 2003
  • #1
I was thinking about swapping a 5.0 engine into my 01GT, stroking it out to 347, add a power adder, and do the typical heads, cam, and intake. The problem with the 2Vs are they are already maxed out in a way. You can not get above 300RWHP typically by swapping heads, cam and intake let alone make 350RWHP+ as you can in a 302. Let alone stroking it is almost out of the question because all you can get out of it is a 302. Where as you can stroke a 5.0 to a 331/347 ect. Modulars are cool at first becaue you have more HP out of the box, but imagine if Ford would have kept the 5.0, and slapped sweet heads on them like they did on the 99+? They would be making 280HP out of the box minimum. The 2Vs are maxed out of the factory due to good engineering from the factory. The exhaust manifold flow well enough that replacing them with shorties dont gain any real HP. The only improvement you can make on the heads is to port the stock ones. And you only gain about 5HP if you get the bullit intake. So what would it take to do this, and would it be worth it? Think about this too, at least there are forged pistons in the 5.0.
 

Snikt98GT

Founding Member
Jul 5, 2002
681
0
0
Daytona Beach, FL
Jul 31, 2003
#2
  • Jul 31, 2003
  • #2
How about a 351W @ 396?
 
K

KickerStang

Founding Member
May 6, 2002
593
0
0
Colorado Springs
Jul 31, 2003
#3
  • Jul 31, 2003
  • #3
That would be cool too.
 

-281 2V-

New Member
Apr 29, 2003
347
0
0
Tampa, FL
Jul 31, 2003
#4
  • Jul 31, 2003
  • #4
Interesting... I would consider a 408W if this were doable.
 

NasaGT

Founding Member
Sep 19, 2002
1,993
2
49
Virginia
Jul 31, 2003
#5
  • Jul 31, 2003
  • #5
Don't some of the K-member manufacturers (MM, D&D, etc..) offer versions for the 4.6L and the 5.0L? Isn't that all you would need?

Also - when you say "at least there are forged pistons in the 5.0" do you mean stock???
 

-281 2V-

New Member
Apr 29, 2003
347
0
0
Tampa, FL
Jul 31, 2003
#6
  • Jul 31, 2003
  • #6
NasaGT said:
...when you say "at least there are forged pistons in the 5.0" do you mean stock???
Click to expand...
Many, if not most 5.0s came with forged pistons.
 

Snikt98GT

Founding Member
Jul 5, 2002
681
0
0
Daytona Beach, FL
Jul 31, 2003
#7
  • Jul 31, 2003
  • #7
NasaGT said:
Don't some of the K-member manufacturers (MM, D&D, etc..) offer versions for the 4.6L and the 5.0L? Isn't that all you would need?

Also - when you say "at least there are forged pistons in the 5.0" do you mean stock???
Click to expand...

93 5.0s had hyper pistons. 87-92 had TRW forged
 

Snikt98GT

Founding Member
Jul 5, 2002
681
0
0
Daytona Beach, FL
Jul 31, 2003
#8
  • Jul 31, 2003
  • #8
-281 2V- said:
Many, if not most 5.0s came with forged pistons.
Click to expand...

Hyper pistons are lighter
 

-281 2V-

New Member
Apr 29, 2003
347
0
0
Tampa, FL
Jul 31, 2003
#9
  • Jul 31, 2003
  • #9
Snikt98GT said:
Hyper pistons are lighter
Click to expand...
And weaker


 
6

68 & 00 GT

New Member
May 14, 2003
2,407
1
0
HOUSTON TEXAS
Jul 31, 2003
#10
  • Jul 31, 2003
  • #10
well the way I see it by the time you spend that much $ on getting a 5.0 in your Stang you could have achieved the same RWHP with a 4.6 There are tons of people here getting 500-700 RWHP (you know who you are) here on the 4.6.
Especially since you're not opposed to a power adder -
here ya go -
Forged internals
Forged crank -
bore .20 over
P&P heads / cams / springs bigger valves
full good exhaust system
Supercharger / good tune
and you're there.
You'll have to do all that and more, and less to achieve your goals on the 5.0 too -
I think the blocks hold up better than a 302 also. Enjoy the 4.6 geez.
 

-281 2V-

New Member
Apr 29, 2003
347
0
0
Tampa, FL
Jul 31, 2003
#11
  • Jul 31, 2003
  • #11
An extra 66 cubes never hurt anyone...
 

NasaGT

Founding Member
Sep 19, 2002
1,993
2
49
Virginia
Jul 31, 2003
#12
  • Jul 31, 2003
  • #12
-281 2V- said:
Many, if not most 5.0s came with forged pistons.
Click to expand...

Thanks - I did not know that.....
 
6

68 & 00 GT

New Member
May 14, 2003
2,407
1
0
HOUSTON TEXAS
Jul 31, 2003
#13
  • Jul 31, 2003
  • #13
-281 2V- said:
An extra 66 cubes never hurt anyone...
Click to expand...

Ha ha - yeah 600 RWHP is soooo much better that 550 !
Really depends on his goals. But if you put it that way why not get a 460, or the V-10 kit ?
No ? Me neither.
 

Ryan02Stang

Active Member
Jun 17, 2003
1,181
0
36
Arlington Heights, Illinois
Jul 31, 2003
#14
  • Jul 31, 2003
  • #14
If I was going to swap my motor I wouldnt even bother with a 302...I would go straight for a 460...it fits in our car! That would be TOTAL badass!!!
 
K

KickerStang

Founding Member
May 6, 2002
593
0
0
Colorado Springs
Jul 31, 2003
#15
  • Jul 31, 2003
  • #15
Nice suggestions. Maybe I oughtta broaden my horizens a bit. 427 big block
 

Dale Royster

Founding Member
Jan 6, 2002
558
0
0
Canton, Michigan
Jul 31, 2003
#16
  • Jul 31, 2003
  • #16
KickerStang said:
I was thinking about swapping a 5.0 engine into my 01GT, stroking it out to 347, add a power adder, and do the typical heads, cam, and intake. The problem with the 2Vs are they are already maxed out in a way. You can not get above 300RWHP typically by swapping heads, cam and intake let alone make 350RWHP+ as you can in a 302. Let alone stroking it is almost out of the question because all you can get out of it is a 302. Where as you can stroke a 5.0 to a 331/347 ect. Modulars are cool at first becaue you have more HP out of the box, but imagine if Ford would have kept the 5.0, and slapped sweet heads on them like they did on the 99+? They would be making 280HP out of the box minimum. The 2Vs are maxed out of the factory due to good engineering from the factory. The exhaust manifold flow well enough that replacing them with shorties dont gain any real HP. The only improvement you can make on the heads is to port the stock ones. And you only gain about 5HP if you get the bullit intake. So what would it take to do this, and would it be worth it? Think about this too, at least there are forged pistons in the 5.0.
Click to expand...




Id seriously consider firing your engine builder if you think that the mods are incapable of making more then 300hp. 2V Heads can flow every bit as good or better then a junk pushrod 5.0 ... You dont even have to run a 2V, you need even more power, get a cobra engine, or put 4V heads on your car.
Pushrod V8s are dead for a reason, New tech is better tech.

Oh and VT Engines in Lansing is making a 324" Mod btw... Im sure there is alot more to come. Nobody figured out how to make a 468" Small block chevy until a year or so ago. That motors been around since when? 1953?
 
K

KickerStang

Founding Member
May 6, 2002
593
0
0
Colorado Springs
Jul 31, 2003
#17
  • Jul 31, 2003
  • #17
Dale Royster said:


Id seriously consider firing your engine builder if you think that the mods are incapable of making more then 300hp. 2V Heads can flow every bit as good or better then a junk pushrod 5.0 ... You dont even have to run a 2V, you need even more power, get a cobra engine, or put 4V heads on your car.
Pushrod V8s are dead for a reason, New tech is better tech.

Oh and VT Engines in Lansing is making a 324" Mod btw... Im sure there is alot more to come. Nobody figured out how to make a 468" Small block chevy until a year or so ago. That motors been around since when? 1953?
Click to expand...

300RWHP NA. You can not put 4V heads on a GT block you need a Cobra block. All I am saying is if you take the stock 2V and compare it to a 5.0 with decent heads, decent intake, shorties, and a mild cam it will make more HP then the 4.6. I am comparing them because the 2V has decent heads, decent intake, decent exhaust manifolds and a stock cam that is decent.
 
6

68 & 00 GT

New Member
May 14, 2003
2,407
1
0
HOUSTON TEXAS
Jul 31, 2003
#18
  • Jul 31, 2003
  • #18
KickerStang said:
300RWHP NA. You can not put 4V heads on a GT block you need a Cobra block. All I am saying is if you take the stock 2V and compare it to a 5.0 with decent heads, decent intake, shorties, and a mild cam it will make more HP then the 4.6. I am comparing them because the 2V has decent heads, decent intake, decent exhaust manifolds and a stock cam that is decent.
Click to expand...

Still not the same thing though. Imagine what a 4.6 could do w/ all that !
Instead you just mod the 4.6 it's own way, and it works out very well ! What you say are decent qualities of a 4.6 can be upgraded to better parts too -
head work, intake work, add Longtubes, get new cams ! We just have to brush up the heads, and intake rather then replace them completely.
 
K

KickerStang

Founding Member
May 6, 2002
593
0
0
Colorado Springs
Jul 31, 2003
#19
  • Jul 31, 2003
  • #19
68 & 00 GT said:
Still not the same thing though. Imagine what a 4.6 could do w/ all that !
Instead you just mod the 4.6 it own way, and it works out very well ! What you say are decent qualities of a 4.6 can be upgraded to better parts too -
Click to expand...

Problem...
1. There are no aftermarket heads, all you can do it port and you might gain 15HP $1300
2. There are no aftermarket intakes except for the bullet and you might gain 5HP $1400
3. You might gain 10HP with cams $500
4. You might gain 2-4HP from shorties over the stock manifolds $500+

On a 5.0 you can bet on doubling those gains
1. 30HP for heads
2. 10HP for intake
3. 10-20HP for cams
4. 10HP for shorties
 
C

CatmanJJ

Captain Tangnet
20+ Year Stangneter
Feb 5, 2002
4,379
1
68
Maryland
Jul 31, 2003
#20
  • Jul 31, 2003
  • #20
What about the fact that the 4.6 respons really well to supercharger applications That makes up a huge difference I think. With some reinforcement aren't there some real 4.6 SOHC and DOHC monsters out there?
 
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
Next
1 of 4 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Ford truck engine swap issues
  • keel
  • Jul 7, 2026
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
17
Views
228
Other Auto Tech Monday at 1:17 PM
General karthief
1
Engine Motor swap from a 2003 Explorer
  • 1996mustang new
  • Oct 9, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
582
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Oct 16, 2025
squeak93
X
Engine 5.0 Head Gaskets installed wrong block coolant passages???
  • Xam Sirrah
  • Jul 21, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
12
Views
658
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Dec 22, 2025
Qtrhrse23
Q
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
835
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
9
Milton Questions, 351 swap newedge
  • 996stang
  • Jul 20, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
214
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 25, 2026
Killer351w
K
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?