• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

t56 or turbo 400?

  • Thread starter Thread starter tshoey33
  • Start date Start date Apr 5, 2012
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

tshoey33

Member
Dec 13, 2011
9
1
13
northampton pa
Apr 5, 2012
#1
  • Apr 5, 2012
  • #1
building a 347 turbo motor for my 89 gt. trying to decide if i should put a t56 tranny behind it or a turbo 400 with manual valve body. any thoughts?
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Apr 6, 2012
#2
  • Apr 6, 2012
  • #2
Ummm....pretty big variation there. What do you want...a stick, or an auto?
 

fiveohwblow

Official Member
15 Year Member
Jul 21, 2005
2,169
145
155
Apr 6, 2012
#3
  • Apr 6, 2012
  • #3
What are your intentions? Drag racing or street/auto x?
 

jdb3rd

Member
Apr 28, 2005
166
3
19
edgewater MD
Apr 6, 2012
#4
  • Apr 6, 2012
  • #4
Unless you plan on drag racing alot I strongly suggest the t-56
 
Reactions: 90lxcoupe

tshoey33

Member
Dec 13, 2011
9
1
13
northampton pa
Apr 6, 2012
#5
  • Apr 6, 2012
  • #5
It will be mostly a street car.
 

Boosted92LX

It's only an inch or two. What's the big deal?
15 Year Member
Dec 19, 2010
5,721
4,244
224
Apr 6, 2012
#6
  • Apr 6, 2012
  • #6
I have a friend with a T56 and 76mm LS2 turbo camaro and it's vicious. Sometimes I think it would do better if he didn't have such a close ratio trans and the turbo was able to spool more between shifts.. By the time he's at full boost (which is a split second), he's shifting already, and that's with 3.55 gears. I plan on going the same route, only I got the wide ratio 5 speed TKO to allow more spool time. Turbos make more torque than any other power adder, close ratio gearboxes are not as necessary, imo...
 

srtthis

the guy doing it does every local racers rear end
15 Year Member
Jul 3, 2009
5,129
1,666
204
Maryland
Apr 6, 2012
#7
  • Apr 6, 2012
  • #7
SSeater said:
I have a friend with a T56 and 76mm LS2 turbo camaro and it's vicious. Sometimes I think it would do better if he didn't have such a close ratio trans and the turbo was able to spool more between shifts.. By the time he's at full boost (which is a split second), he's shifting already, and that's with 3.55 gears. I plan on going the same route, only I got the wide ratio 5 sped TKO to allow more spool time. Turbos make more torque than any other power adder, close ratio gearboxes are not as necessary, imo...
Click to expand...
correct... thats why you see them running such high gearing.
but im nor sure if a turbo makes more torque then a nitrous car. that would be a close one.
 

Boosted92LX

It's only an inch or two. What's the big deal?
15 Year Member
Dec 19, 2010
5,721
4,244
224
Apr 6, 2012
#8
  • Apr 6, 2012
  • #8
srtthis said:
correct... thats why you see them running such high gearing.
but im nor sure if a turbo makes more torque then a nitrous car. that would be a close one.
Click to expand...

By power adder I meant snail, centri blower, or screw/roots... didn't factor in nitrous, although seeing specs on that would be interesting.
 

jdb3rd

Member
Apr 28, 2005
166
3
19
edgewater MD
Apr 6, 2012
#9
  • Apr 6, 2012
  • #9
I agree about gearing with the t-56. I have 3:73's and would love to have a set of 3:55's in there. But I've been thinking of a 331 or 347 with maybe 8psi of boost or so and that has me even thinking 3:27's.
 

bentley429isBAC

10 Year Member
Jul 23, 2009
922
188
84
CT
Apr 7, 2012
#10
  • Apr 7, 2012
  • #10
Had a stick and ended up with a th400 running a turbo. Was night and day.
 

Incon

Member
Jun 14, 2010
88
1
9
Apr 7, 2012
#11
  • Apr 7, 2012
  • #11
I know from my experience that I kept the car in control and off the rev limiter much better with an auto when street driving. Something to consider especially if you have a stock block.
 

FastDriver

I was uncomfortably high & wearing a helmet
SN Certified Technician
Sep 5, 2001
6,079
2,680
224
Vass, NC
Apr 8, 2012
#12
  • Apr 8, 2012
  • #12
I've gone back and forth on this so often. I've always had a manual in my cars and its hard for me to think of going with an auto. But its also hard for me to imagine giving up so much performance, consistency, and stability. I cannot keep up with my car using the TKO, though it is notch as hell and needs a rebuild. Anyway, at the moment I'm really thinking about a lentech with a locking converter. That might be the best compromise on a street car.
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Apr 8, 2012
#13
  • Apr 8, 2012
  • #13
Even if the auto was the prefference....what's the matter with a built C4?
 

Mr. Rustypwnz

Advanced Member
Jun 1, 2005
1,761
63
69
indianapolis/ valdosta ga
Apr 8, 2012
#14
  • Apr 8, 2012
  • #14
^they suck thats why. Nobody wants to rebuild a trans every year.
 

Mr. Rustypwnz

Advanced Member
Jun 1, 2005
1,761
63
69
indianapolis/ valdosta ga
Apr 8, 2012
#15
  • Apr 8, 2012
  • #15
FastDriver said:
I've gone back and forth on this so often. I've always had a manual in my cars and its hard for me to think of going with an auto. But its also hard for me to imagine giving up so much performance, consistency, and stability. I cannot keep up with my car using the TKO, though it is notch as hell and needs a rebuild. Anyway, at the moment I'm really thinking about a lentech with a locking converter. That might be the best compromise on a street car.
Click to expand...

you would love a built 4r70.
 

hoopty5.0

mechanicus terribilis
15 Year Member
Dec 14, 2010
7,779
6,933
214
SW Houston
Apr 8, 2012
#16
  • Apr 8, 2012
  • #16
FastDriver said:
I've gone back and forth on this so often. I've always had a manual in my cars and its hard for me to think of going with an auto. But its also hard for me to imagine giving up so much performance, consistency, and stability. I cannot keep up with my car using the TKO, though it is notch as hell and needs a rebuild. Anyway, at the moment I'm really thinking about a lentech with a locking converter. That might be the best compromise on a street car.
Click to expand...

The Lentech has a full manual valve body, right? I read their site the other day, but can't remember. A couple of them just sold in the classy-fides
 

Bullitt347

I have been doing it wrong this whole time
15 Year Member
Mar 23, 2007
3,957
2,916
194
Middle of Maine
Apr 8, 2012
#17
  • Apr 8, 2012
  • #17
Mr. Rustypwnz said:
^they suck thats why. Nobody wants to rebuild a trans every year.
Click to expand...
Only if you do not build it right, there are just as good of parts available for the C-4 as there are for any other 3 speed trans. It is not cheap to build, unless you build it on the cheap. But they are quite capable of taking 1,000 HP. and without rebuilding every year. The big upside is small size and weight, the down side is only 3 gears and that sucks for a street car.
 

Mr. Rustypwnz

Advanced Member
Jun 1, 2005
1,761
63
69
indianapolis/ valdosta ga
Apr 8, 2012
#18
  • Apr 8, 2012
  • #18
Bullitt347 said:
Only if you do not build it right, there are just as good of parts available for the C-4 as there are for any other 3 speed trans. It is not cheap to build, unless you build it on the cheap. But they are quite capable of taking 1,000 HP. and without rebuilding every year. The big upside is small size and weight, the down side is only 3 gears and that sucks for a street car.
Click to expand...

I have SEEN a couple at 1000hp, but they never lasted very long. I have HEARD of them lasting for a good while though at 1000hp, given one was a nitrous car on upwards of 300hp hit of nitrous, so that might be a factor on destroying one.

For his car though I think he would love a 4r70
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Apr 8, 2012
#19
  • Apr 8, 2012
  • #19
I'm going to take a shot in the dark here and say the OP isn't shooting for 1,000hp with a turbo 347.

400-600hp is more likely...which will keep a decently built C4 together just fine. Or a 4R70W for that matter.
 

srtthis

the guy doing it does every local racers rear end
15 Year Member
Jul 3, 2009
5,129
1,666
204
Maryland
Apr 9, 2012
#20
  • Apr 9, 2012
  • #20
Gearbanger 101 said:
I'm going to take a shot in the dark here and say the OP isn't shooting for 1,000hp with a turbo 347.

400-600hp is more likely...which will keep a decently built C4 together just fine. Or a 4R70W for that matter.
Click to expand...
depends on the C4 the converter and how well he cools it. turbos are hard as on autos.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

3
393W Stroker with Boost - Need Spark Plug Recommendations
  • 387lx
  • Apr 29, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
267
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 30, 2026
HotFox
J
Help Figuring Motor Choice(Possible future turbo)?
  • jaygee15
  • Dec 14, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
13
Views
607
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 3, 2026
Jarhead67
J
C
C4 trans help needed
  • CPH89LX
  • Apr 26, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
6
Views
185
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 28, 2026
CPH89LX
C
351w turbo build.... Turbo guys teach me things...
  • Kid wita 5oh
  • Oct 22, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
13
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 23, 2025
General karthief
H
Forced Induction On3 Turbo Kit- Parts list NEEDED - 302 Stock Motor
  • Hirothecool1
  • Feb 27, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 7, 2026
slow84lx
S
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?