• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-

TB & Plenum Questions

  • Thread starter Thread starter blaxican27
  • Start date Start date Aug 30, 2010

blaxican27

Member
Jan 26, 2009
39
0
7
Dallas, Texas
Aug 30, 2010
#1
  • Aug 30, 2010
  • #1
I am in the process of doing a rebuild with bolts on and want to know if Accufab tb & plenom combo is worht the money and the power or is there another combo i can go with. Mods going along with the tb & plenum are hitech stage two cams, mac long tube headers, mac oR H, jlt CAI, ford racing 3.73 gears, u/d pullies, and well will be tuned using 93 octane.
 

sneaky98gt

10 Year Member
Apr 23, 2008
2,387
144
114
NC State University
Aug 30, 2010
#2
  • Aug 30, 2010
  • #2
I bought a Stack Racing 75 mm TB for less than $100 on sale. There is absolutely nothing wrong with it, and I can't imagine how a $400 TB is any better.

Same goes for the plenum; my plenum is built into the blower, but I've heard good things about the C&L plenum. And it's cheaper than the Accufab.
 
F

Fink132

Member
Mar 14, 2010
180
0
16
Alberta, Canada
Aug 30, 2010
#3
  • Aug 30, 2010
  • #3
I bought the 70mm accufab throttlebody/plenum package.

Haven't installed it yet, but I'm hoping to do it within the next few days
I think it will be worth the money
 

blaxican27

Member
Jan 26, 2009
39
0
7
Dallas, Texas
Aug 30, 2010
#4
  • Aug 30, 2010
  • #4
I keep hearing the best out there is accufab and so i was considering going with the 75MM but im just wondering for the price and power output is it really worth spending that much or is something else just as good.
 

Dark04GT

10 Year Member
Apr 27, 2008
758
62
59
NC
Aug 30, 2010
#5
  • Aug 30, 2010
  • #5
blaxican27 said:
I am in the process of doing a rebuild with bolts on and want to know if Accufab tb & plenom combo is worht the money and the power or is there another combo i can go with. Mods going along with the tb & plenum are hitech stage two cams, mac long tube headers, mac oR H, jlt CAI, ford racing 3.73 gears, u/d pullies, and well will be tuned using 93 octane.
Click to expand...

My local performance shop always has good things to say about accufab. He says in his 15+ years he has never had a customer come back and complain about accufab parts. I like mine and don't regret buying it. That being said, yeah you pay the extra money, the gains are minimal over the competition, it is your call.

Here is the most decent comparison test of just the plenums between the major brands that I know of (accufab wins by a little over 1 rwhp vs. other aftermarkets):
The Plenum Showdown Part II
 

Tim2002GT

Founding Member
Apr 10, 2002
635
4
29
Tulsa, Oklahoma
Aug 30, 2010
#6
  • Aug 30, 2010
  • #6
IMO, it is not worth the extra money over any other aftermarket plenum/throttle body. Unless you are really into appearance, then the Accufab is by far the best looking. I am using a 75mm Professional Products tb and TrickFlow plenum and it works fine. I paid less than $200 new for the combo.
 

BurningRubber

10 Year Member
Dec 6, 2004
1,865
24
58
Aug 30, 2010
#7
  • Aug 30, 2010
  • #7
Tim2002GT said:
IMO, it is not worth the extra money over any other aftermarket plenum/throttle body. Unless you are really into appearance, then the Accufab is by far the best looking. I am using a 75mm Professional Products tb and TrickFlow plenum and it works fine. I paid less than $200 new for the combo.
Click to expand...

Agreed. The TB's and plenums will perform very similar to eachother. Accufab did edge out the others in that test if I remember correctly, but I'll find the 1.2hp somewhere else for an extra $200 some-odd dollars.

If you want a show piece, it is definitely nice. I'm more into the TrickFlow or BBK black plenums, but that's personal preference.


I'm also using a 75mm PP throttle body. It's very smooth, no fitment issues. I have an RPM (C&L knockoff) plenum. Aside from the terribly cheap casting (doesn't matter, no moving parts) it's fine aside from a little bit of the lip that needs to be opened up for a clean flow from the throttle body. I ended up painting mine black and grinding the paint off the letters "RPM". Oddly enough they now sell it like that, lol.
 

Rejekt

Member
Aug 12, 2010
546
13
18
Raleigh, NC
Aug 30, 2010
#8
  • Aug 30, 2010
  • #8
Yeah ACCUFAB isn't worth the money IMO. Of course, unless you're going for a totally polished bay. If so, stack racing offers the same polished pieces. I'm going with the C&L with probably one of the cheaper 75mm TB's, maybe a stack racing or professional products.
 

tank_567

Active Member
Mar 19, 2007
731
26
29
Raleigh, Nc
Aug 31, 2010
#9
  • Aug 31, 2010
  • #9
BBK 78mm Mustang Throttle Intake (96-04 GT) at AmericanMuscle.com - Free Shipping!
 

blaxican27

Member
Jan 26, 2009
39
0
7
Dallas, Texas
Aug 31, 2010
#10
  • Aug 31, 2010
  • #10
thanks for all the info guys...although accufab is the best out there, i went ahead and saved about $173 and went with a professionals product 75mm TB and c&l plenum....
 

Rejekt

Member
Aug 12, 2010
546
13
18
Raleigh, NC
Aug 31, 2010
#11
  • Aug 31, 2010
  • #11
Now ya got $173 to spend on something else!
 
F

Fink132

Member
Mar 14, 2010
180
0
16
Alberta, Canada
Aug 31, 2010
#12
  • Aug 31, 2010
  • #12
I thought a 75mm throttlebody is supposed to be for supercharged mustangs??
Thats what AM said anyway...
 

BurningRubber

10 Year Member
Dec 6, 2004
1,865
24
58
Aug 31, 2010
#13
  • Aug 31, 2010
  • #13
75mm will benefit a forced induction car, but it won't hurt to put one on an N/A car.
 

Dark04GT

10 Year Member
Apr 27, 2008
758
62
59
NC
Sep 1, 2010
#14
  • Sep 1, 2010
  • #14
BurningRubber said:
75mm will benefit a forced induction car, but it won't hurt to put one on an N/A car.
Click to expand...

+1

I think C&L tested between the 70mm and 75mm and found a ~1-2 rwhp benefit by going with the 75mm on a NA stang.
 

kalvick

Founding Member
Jun 29, 2001
352
8
39
Norwalk, CT
Sep 1, 2010
#15
  • Sep 1, 2010
  • #15
I went with Accufab with the 75tb, I wanted chrome. 400 bucks probabbly buys you 1/2 hp over other $100 brands.

its all about cost to performance ratio. a cheaper plenum and t/b would be fine if you dont care about looks.

if its all about cost to looks ratio, a more expensive plenum and tb would be fine if you dont care about costs.
 
F

Fink132

Member
Mar 14, 2010
180
0
16
Alberta, Canada
Sep 1, 2010
#16
  • Sep 1, 2010
  • #16
Dark04GT said:
+1

I think C&L tested between the 70mm and 75mm and found a ~1-2 rwhp benefit by going with the 75mm on a NA stang.
Click to expand...

Damn... I wish I woulda went with the 75mm one then... but oh well I won't feel the difference anyway
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

M
My numbers sound right?
  • MiltP
  • Feb 25, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
28
Views
656
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Apr 2, 2026
MiltP
M
Tuners come on inside
  • squeak93
  • Feb 13, 2026
  • SVT Tech Forum
Replies
1
Views
213
SVT Tech Forum Feb 20, 2026
squeak93
A
Discussion on mild budget build/ top end
  • Acesario
  • Feb 21, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
642
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 23, 2026
General karthief
Intended Headers and Trans, questions about fitment
  • from6to8
  • Aug 6, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
22
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 6, 2025
from6to8
Engine HELP - 351W Based Build Under Stock Hood
  • thinkfaster
  • Oct 17, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
13
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Dec 31, 2025
Qtrhrse23
Q
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?