• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

TCP motor mounts and headers?

  • Thread starter Thread starter hurt
  • Start date Start date May 30, 2005
H

hurt

Member
Apr 1, 2005
173
0
16
San Antonio, TX
May 30, 2005
#1
  • May 30, 2005
  • #1
Which headers can I use in my 66 with a 302 and TCP motor mounts? I've seen the jba's and what they say about fitting. I just want to be sure before I throw down that much money.

Dan

http://www.jbaheaders.com/1650tech.asp
 

washMO66

Founding Member
Oct 30, 2001
1,000
0
37
55
Washington, MO
May 30, 2005
#2
  • May 30, 2005
  • #2
I have the TCP solid mounts in my 66 coupe and I run Ceramic coated Hooker Super Comps - 1 5/8 primarys and 3" collectors.

They are as tight as tight can be but they fit fine.

TB
 

zm830101

New Member
May 16, 2005
116
0
0
warner robins, ga
May 30, 2005
#3
  • May 30, 2005
  • #3
washMO66 said:
I have the TCP solid mounts in my 66 coupe and I run Ceramic coated Hooker Super Comps - 1 5/8 primarys and 3" collectors.

They are as tight as tight can be but they fit fine.

TB
Click to expand...
this is the set up that i was considering but now i am curious, do you think they would fit with the 1-3/4 primaries?
 
H

hurt

Member
Apr 1, 2005
173
0
16
San Antonio, TX
May 30, 2005
#4
  • May 30, 2005
  • #4
Did you have to mess with the upper control arm studs? JBA says they may have to be shortened for theirs to work.
 

washMO66

Founding Member
Oct 30, 2001
1,000
0
37
55
Washington, MO
May 30, 2005
#5
  • May 30, 2005
  • #5
In my opinion I think that 1 3/4" primarys would be a stretch as I have less than 1/8" clearance on both sides.

As far as the UCA studs, in my case that was a solid yes but I had installed TCP UCA's and performed the shelby drop prior to installing my motor so I anticipated this problem and cut the UCA studs pretty well flush with the nut.

TB
 
H

hurt

Member
Apr 1, 2005
173
0
16
San Antonio, TX
May 30, 2005
#6
  • May 30, 2005
  • #6
And that would mean I have to get the thing aligned first. I wonder if I could loosen the UCA so the studs are flush, then re-tighten after the headers are in??
hmmmmm....
Is there nothing easy on this car?

What do you think about Hi-Po manifolds? They should fit pretty well. This is a stock 302 so I don't NEED anything too fancy.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Exhaust 1 3/4” Long Tubes on a Fox Body AOD – Easiest route?
  • 5.0 Mike
  • Mar 19, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
6
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 21, 2025
5.0 Mike
J
Help Figuring Motor Choice(Possible future turbo)?
  • jaygee15
  • Dec 14, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
13
Views
662
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 3, 2026
Jarhead67
J
H
Forced Induction On3 Turbo Kit- Parts list NEEDED - 302 Stock Motor
  • Hirothecool1
  • Feb 27, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 7, 2026
slow84lx
S
Oil choice for after break in period.
  • Sask84gt
  • Feb 28, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
26
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 14, 2026
Praetorious
P
1
Engine Motor swap from a 2003 Explorer
  • 1996mustang new
  • Oct 9, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
614
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Oct 16, 2025
squeak93
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?